by bombers boy » Sat Mar 29, 2014 9:06 am
by Ted E Bear » Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:36 pm
by bombers boy » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:25 am
Ted E Bear wrote:They will be the big improvers and finish 4th but I have heard them talking it up too. It might actualy mean something when you beat them this season.
by Ted E Bear » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:37 am
by westcoastpanther » Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:23 pm
by bombers boy » Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:44 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Beat Souths last year who played in a GF
by westcoastpanther » Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:32 am
bombers boy wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Beat Souths last year who played in a GF
one game doesn't make a season
by bombers boy » Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:33 am
westcoastpanther wrote:bombers boy wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Beat Souths last year who played in a GF
one game doesn't make a season
You said people forget how far off we were last season, the above result would suggest otherwise.
Think we had some close results with Rangers as well?
The quality kids we have will improve out of sight with some bigger bodies around them.
Forwards like Dale Gerricke will also come on in leaps and bounds with other options around them, Dylan Dunn for example.
by Ted E Bear » Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:33 am
by Old Son » Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:44 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:Barry Johncock hearing next week. What do you think will happen?
by Ted E Bear » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:11 am
by Old Son » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:41 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:I am sure they would have millions and millions of dollars in 'liability insurance'.
by ironknob » Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:12 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:The SANFL make the appeal decision don't they? The PLFL operate under the SANFL banner and I am sure they would have millions and millions of dollars in 'liability insurance'.
I hear a whisper from the PLFL that a certain club is being investigated regarding recruiting and recruiting protocol after complaints from 4 other clubs against the club. It may go to a tribunal hearing as apparently all clubs were warned of protocol by the PLFL earlier. Issue is no letters, training with clubs while not cleared.
by Rama_Army09 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:28 pm
by Ted E Bear » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:00 pm
by Ted E Bear » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:06 pm
by Rama_Army09 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:53 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:The PLFL have procedures RamaArmy. You cant just train wherever you want to, not send letters etc. It looks like one club who claim to have poached 20 odd players has disregarded all rules after being warned. It has become a major white elephant that hasn't been spoken about, until now, but rival clubs have been talking and are starting to get sick of it. 4 clubs have now put in official complaints led by the closely related club.
A tribunal hearing date is to be set. I wouldn't expect much to happen in way of a penalty but might be a wake up call to the club who obviously don't have the right procedures in place.
Its been a bit disappointing as I know a few members and existing player parents from that club who have been disappointed about the way the club has gone about poaching players.
by Ted E Bear » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:02 pm
by steakn » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:19 am
Ted E Bear wrote:Looking forward to unveiling our new recruit on Saturday. He was on the crows list as a junior. I cant see anyone in this competition being able to stop him.
by Rama_Army09 » Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:31 am
Ted E Bear wrote:Why have clearances / contracts then?
Do you think it should be open slather?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |