Footy Smart wrote:HH3 wrote:tigerhutch wrote:its all about charity
What did the Crows do in the last year to deserve preferential treatment?
Its not about preferential treatment. Trigg as CEO was on radio answering questions about the requests that the AFC made to AFL regarding programing and naturally hosting the first game at Adelaide Oval. He was dissapointed that the AFC didnt get what they wanted (as all clubs would be) including the right to host the first game be it a showdown or not. He also spoke about by AFC not having the first showdown it would mean the other request for an ANZAC day evening game would be very unlikely. I have no problem with the CEO trying to get the best outcome for AFC and being dissapointed if it doesnt eventuate (waiting for a comeback relating to Trigg's involvement with the tippet saga).
When I was listening to it, I was thinking, geez the crows haters will have a field day with this interview

I listened to the whole thing too. It just sounded like he thinks the Crows should automatically get everything first. Fair enough the Crows are better off financially than Port, and because of that, they can put more money into the SANFL, etc. But Port were on the back foot when they entered the AFL, because most of Adelaide were already supporting the Crows.
Currently, Port are doing a lot of things better than the Crows. I dont support either team, but over the 2013 season I took more interest in what Port was doing, and hoped they would go well. They should get rewarded for fighting through the tough times time after time, and getting to the pointy end of the season, when most people think they cant.