southee wrote:
Come join a SANFL club that voted NO!
But your club voted yes for the Port model

by Jim05 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:05 pm
southee wrote:
Come join a SANFL club that voted NO!
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:10 pm
Jim05 wrote:Like the Cows model, I believe both can be re assesed every year and both clubs booted out.
How can we change our directors so that we can boot these clubs out next year?
by Jim05 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:12 pm
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:Like the Cows model, I believe both can be re assesed every year and both clubs booted out.
How can we change our directors so that we can boot these clubs out next year?
Too late, even if they are only in for 1 year the damage will have been done.
I like many others are disgusted that the hardcore SANFL supporters that form the support base for the traditional clubs have been ignored.
It will be a very silent protest next year when none of us turn up to games.
Most of us once you add up memberships, merchandise, food, drink etc would spend $1k pa at our clubs, even if only 100 people stop their support that $100k less coming onto the club.
by bays2011 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:29 pm
southee wrote:bays2011 wrote:UK Fan wrote:sjt wrote:F$&@ the sanfl commission and the six gutless, spineless piss weak clubs directors. Youve destroyed our competition. When you get knocked out the finals and your players are gutted for missing an opportunity to win a flag (what they strive for). Or when an afl player on the equivalent money of a whole teams salary cap wins the Margarey then maybe you'll start to see the repercussions of your selfish weakness as the "guardians" of OUR competition.
Your decisions aren't justifiable otherwise you'd justify them. For $50,000 for f$&&@ sake!
I'll never attend the home ground of a yes voting club again, (with the exception of the reserves finals).
How can you fold so easily?
Shattered with football, shattered for football. I'm sure i'm not alone. How can you be so deaf to your members?
Cheats and corruption win.
Well said!!!
Except he forgot to mention that it is not JUST for $50,000. There is also the vague suggestion there might be a commercial TV deal.
My club voted yes to this sh!t without the slightest effort to consult with members. I will never again be a member of my club. Disgrace.
Come join a SANFL club that voted NO!
by areaman » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:55 pm
by Blackwhite » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:20 pm
by saintal » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:28 pm
by saintal » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:29 pm
Blackwhite wrote:The magpies as we know the are officially dead. Very sad
by fester69 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:31 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:48 pm
by SimonH » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:55 pm
According to Keith Thomas, it was 7-1. No talk of who voted against.fester69 wrote:...
Unlike the Crows vote which was 6-2, the Port vote WAS unanimous.
...
by Aerie » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:56 pm
SimonH wrote:According to Keith Thomas, it was 7-1. No talk of who voted against.fester69 wrote:...
Unlike the Crows vote which was 6-2, the Port vote WAS unanimous.
...
by UK Fan » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:Like the Cows model, I believe both can be re assesed every year and both clubs booted out.
How can we change our directors so that we can boot these clubs out next year?
Too late, even if they are only in for 1 year the damage will have been done.
I like many others are disgusted that the hardcore SANFL supporters that form the support base for the traditional clubs have been ignored.
It will be a very silent protest next year when none of us turn up to games.
Most of us once you add up memberships, merchandise, food, drink etc we would spend $1k pa at our clubs, even if only 100 people stop their support that $100k less coming onto the club.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by UK Fan » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:59 pm
areaman wrote:What am I missing here?
Why the concessions for 2014 and then revert to another structure in 2015? Why not just be done with it and do it all next year?
Like every other decision in the past few months, this just makes no sense.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by UK Fan » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:01 am
fester69 wrote:Where are all the Central and South fans calling for their President's heads??
Unlike the Crows vote which was 6-2, the Port vote WAS unanimous.
If I can sling it at my club, how about you keyboard warriors??
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by fester69 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:29 am
by NO-MERCY » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:20 am
Aerie wrote:SimonH wrote:According to Keith Thomas, it was 7-1. No talk of who voted against.fester69 wrote:...
Unlike the Crows vote which was 6-2, the Port vote WAS unanimous.
...
I thought it was West? That was mentioned in the Advertiser at the time of the vote I think. Not sure if there has been a different vote since.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:38 am
fester69 wrote:And just to clarify it was 7 YES - 1 NO, with Norwood being the NO vote.
by sjt » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:39 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:The fight was lost when the Crows got in fester. Some of us have just accepted that the sanfl is no more. Once you let one white ant in.............
by fester69 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:43 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |