All over bar the shouting

[Damo 497]

The SANFL is f**ked thankfully i have the EPL and Test Cricket.

Whats the difference to having a crows reserves team compared to having a team from what used to be the NTFL as suggested many years ago? A team fills the gap. I'm pretty sure most SANFL club could have been bought..just name the price. Pride alone will not preserve the league.

[whufc]

The SANFL is f**ked thankfully i have the EPL and Test Cricket.

Whats the difference to having a crows reserves team compared to having a team from what used to be the NTFL as suggested many years ago? A team fills the gap. I'm pretty sure most SANFL club could have been bought..just name the price. Pride alone will not preserve the league.

The NTFL soles purpose would be to win the SANFL premiership, this will be at best a secondary importance for a Crows reserves side.

Massive Difference.

[smac]

Norwood supporters please note:

I have something for sale and want one million dollars for it. It will be good, trust me.

Who's in?

[twosheds]

The SANFL is f**ked thankfully i have the EPL and Test Cricket.

Whats the difference to having a crows reserves team compared to having a team from what used to be the NTFL as suggested many years ago? A team fills the gap. I'm pretty sure most SANFL club could have been bought..just name the price. Pride alone will not preserve the league.

Damo, thats just plain embarassing yourself. As whufc said the NT team would be trying to win the premiership, the crows reserves will be trying to develop players and all other teams will be at the mercy of Sandersons whims. " we will be playing to win BUT our priority is to develop players." Have you been so ensconced in Sir Jim's issues that you don't get it ?

[SDK]

I believe the club directors have a written duty of care to act in the best interests of the game as a whole and not just their individual club...... this was the loophole the Commission were going to use to vote the Crows in.
Voting YES at least gave the clubs some concessions and some degree of control over what the Crows ( and Port ) can do.
Don't get me wrong I believe in the NO vote and believe the Commission have been deceitful in not allowing full disclosure of information.

[The Sleeping Giant]

So why did honest joe vote yes? Wasn't for best interests of sa footy.

[SDK]

In the opinion of the Commission YES was in the best interests. 8 - 0 NO vote could be overturned on that basis.

[UK Fan]

In the opinion of the Commission YES was in the best interests. 8 - 0 NO vote could be overturned on that basis.

No it couldn't !!! Are you honestly that stupid to believe that crap.


And how would the crows claim unanimous support ???

[fester69]

In the opinion of the Commission YES was in the best interests. 8 - 0 NO vote could be overturned on that basis.

No it couldn't !!! Are you honestly that stupid to believe that crap.


And how would the crows claim unanimous support ???

Yes it could, are you honestly that stupid to believe whatever the vote was the Commission wasn't going to get what it wanted?

[topsywaldron]

Proof that the commission couldn't overturn the Director's vote would b appreciated.

[UK Fan]

In the opinion of the Commission YES was in the best interests. 8 - 0 NO vote could be overturned on that basis.

No it couldn't !!! Are you honestly that stupid to believe that crap.


And how would the crows claim unanimous support ???

Yes it could, are you honestly that stupid to believe whatever the vote was the Commission wasn't going to get what it wanted?

If you want to believe your clubs bs go for it. I wouldn't be calling anyone stupid.

Seems legs fans are as gullible and spineless as their board.

[UK Fan]

Proof that the commission couldn't overturn the Director's vote would b appreciated.

Your boards claim with all due respect. Prove it could.

In a way that crows could then claim they had unanimous support !!!!

[topsywaldron]

Proof that the commission couldn't overturn the Director's vote would b appreciated.

Your boards claim with all due respect. Prove it could.

In a way that crows could then claim they had unanimous support !!!!

We're on the same side here .

I do actually believe the Commission can overturn a director's vote and would love to know why you think otherwise, gives me another thing to keep hammering our board with.

[SDK]

And why is it exclusively Norwood's fault the YES vote went through when 4 other clubs voted yes ?

[UK Fan]

And why is it exclusively Norwood's fault the YES vote went through when 4 other clubs voted yes ?

If u need that explained to you then You are stupider than I thought!!!

Topsy can you fill in if you really don't know

[Jim05]

Proof that the commission couldn't overturn the Director's vote would b appreciated.

Your boards claim with all due respect. Prove it could.

In a way that crows could then claim they had unanimous support !!!!

We're on the same side here .

I do actually believe the Commission can overturn a director's vote and would love to know why you think otherwise, gives me another thing to keep hammering our board with.

Likewise Topsy
I want to find out the truth.
Either way ill still hammer our board though

[Damo 497]

The SANFL is f**ked thankfully i have the EPL and Test Cricket.

Whats the difference to having a crows reserves team compared to having a team from what used to be the NTFL as suggested many years ago? A team fills the gap. I'm pretty sure most SANFL club could have been bought..just name the price. Pride alone will not preserve the league.

Damo, thats just plain embarassing yourself. As whufc said the NT team would be trying to win the premiership, the crows reserves will be trying to develop players and all other teams will be at the mercy of Sandersons whims. " we will be playing to win BUT our priority is to develop players." Have you been so ensconced in Sir Jim's issues that you don't get it ?

Fiar point wufc. Sir Jim? Getting a bit cryptic there but I think I know what you are alluding to. Well twosheds, you have at least 50% of the SANFL clubs to blame for this. I'm assuming you won't be going to anymore SANFL games because the integrity of the whole league is now lost?

[twosheds]

The SANFL is f**ked thankfully i have the EPL and Test Cricket.

Whats the difference to having a crows reserves team compared to having a team from what used to be the NTFL as suggested many years ago? A team fills the gap. I'm pretty sure most SANFL club could have been bought..just name the price. Pride alone will not preserve the league.

Damo, thats just plain embarassing yourself. As whufc said the NT team would be trying to win the premiership, the crows reserves will be trying to develop players and all other teams will be at the mercy of Sandersons whims. " we will be playing to win BUT our priority is to develop players." Have you been so ensconced in Sir Jim's issues that you don't get it ?

Fiar point wufc. Sir Jim? Getting a bit cryptic there but I think I know what you are alluding to. Well twosheds, you have at least 50% of the SANFL clubs to blame for this. I'm assuming you won't be going to anymore SANFL games because the integrity of the whole league is now lost?[/quote.

Cryptic ? Hardly ! Not sure why you care if I go to the footy but to set your mind at rest I will be going to all games except those involving the crows as I will get to see a contest, simple really.

[UK Fan]

Proof that the commission couldn't overturn the Director's vote would b appreciated.

Oi Partick thistle shite

Why dont you ask joe and your scumbag board about Clause 5.5.12.2

http://www.sanfl.com.au/files/_system/F ... titution(5).pdf


which expressly forbids the commission to admit or expel any club into the league without the approval of the league clubs at a directors meeting.

5.5.12.3 also states we can remove ANY power the commission has at an agm.

So fester. Back to your stupid question .....

[on the rails]

No point arguing with the Nwd fans on here who are making up all sorts of shite to cover for their Board and President!