by whufc » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:37 am
by PhilH » Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:42 am
by sjt » Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:43 am
by the joker » Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:47 am
Apachebulldog wrote:OK as a Crow call is faark faark faark i will now call them the FAAAAAARRRRRKKSSSSSSSSSSSS so here is a hypothetical ? for next year what happens if half way thru the year the FAAAAAAARKKS cannot make the AFL finals will their be rules or measures to stop them from stacking their reserves side with senior players in an attempt to win the SANFL GF has this been discussed by Club boards ?????
by Magpiespower » Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:55 am
sjt wrote:http://m.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/one-sanfl-president-stalked-justice-like-a-panther/story-fnia3nqh-1226698775789
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:53 am
by heater31 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:16 am
sjt wrote:http://m.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/one-sanfl-president-stalked-justice-like-a-panther/story-fnia3nqh-1226698775789
by UK Fan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:23 am
UK Fan wrote:Jim05 wrote:dogbreath wrote:Fuc.n unbelievable that they would admit being bought like this !! i.e. in other words screw the integrity of the comp as long as our own club benefits.
![]()
"The NFC has deliberated extensively with the SANFL Commission and the two AFL Clubs in an endeavour to convince them of the merit of the current system.
This has been to no avail.
The Adelaide Football Club are adamant that all their listed players will play under one banner from season 2014 and the Port Adelaide Football Club has maintained its view that it wants to retain all of its SANFL conditions and also have its AFL listed players playing under one banner as soon as possible.
The Norwood Football Club Board rejected the Port Adelaide position and after much deliberation supported the proposal that is to be put to the Adelaide Crows re a Support team in the SANFL League Competition from season 2014.
In doing so the NFC Board was able to gain concessions that will significantly assist the Club in maintaining its position in the Competition.[/color]"
Any truth that the SANFL did a deal with Norwood where if we voted YES we would have our recruiting ban for next season lifted and our fine waived?
Am led to believe our recruiting ban is now lifted.
Shameful if thats all it took to buy us out
If that is the case.
Wouldn't Norwood be I'm breach of rule 13.5 that rucci quoted "must vote in the best interests of sa football".
As they appear to be voting yes clearly to improve themselves. I'm not a lawyer and happy to be corrected but wouldn't that be grounds for an injunction on the matter ??? Ala bays/port 1990
Firstly how many other "negotiated concessions" were offered to club to vote yes. ?? Just because other yes voters didn't brag about such concessions in members emails or at info nights doesn't mean they don't exist
Can we expect more "negotiated concession" discussion at yearly reviews to keep afl clubs in SANFL.
More disturbing for me tripodis states "Adelaide" came to the party with "concessions". But not even AFC or the great Steven Trigg could offer an overturn on a SANFL suspension, which 100% proves the SANFL are involved in these back door dealings.
So who gave Chris Daviea the order to over rule the suspension
A) Olsen
B) whicker
C) all of the above
Chris Davies
A) had no dramas agreeing to the request
B) is just considered as a rubbered stamp
I'm going with C & A.
So any lawyers on the site ???
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:06 am
by UK Fan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:11 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is the best interests of SA FOOTY in this NEW South Australia National Reserves Football League to have every team start on an even basis in relation to drafts and suspensions etc
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:16 am
UK Fan wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is the best interests of SA FOOTY in this NEW South Australia National Reserves Football League to have every team start on an even basis in relation to drafts and suspensions etc
So would individual suspensions be over ruled . Could be an interesting final series.
by UK Fan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:29 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:UK Fan wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is the best interests of SA FOOTY in this NEW South Australia National Reserves Football League to have every team start on an even basis in relation to drafts and suspensions etc
So would individual suspensions be over ruled . Could be an interesting final series.
yep, its only fair isn't it
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Ian » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:39 am
Thats bullshit!mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is the best interests of SA FOOTY in this NEW South Australia National Reserves Football League to have every team start on an even basis in relation to drafts and suspensions etc
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:44 am
whufc wrote:How many games will the SANFL clubs reserves play.
At a guess I'm 14, so they get less games less money how are we going to fight off the ammos and country from taking them even more than they are now!!!!
by Ian » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:14 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:How many games will the SANFL clubs reserves play.
At a guess I'm 14, so they get less games less money how are we going to fight off the ammos and country from taking them even more than they are now!!!!
It's the best thing for footy in SA. SA just won the U18 championships under a system that was no good. Should win it every year now. Crows will certainly play in a AFL GF in 2014, and expect a Crow v Power GF the year after.
by dedja » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:43 pm
heater31 wrote:So who was the President who caved because a sponsor threatened to walk?
by Apachebulldog » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:43 pm
by Ian » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:49 pm
by Ian » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:50 pm
dedja wrote:heater31 wrote:So who was the President who caved because a sponsor threatened to walk?
by Kahuna » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:51 pm
Apachebulldog wrote:How long before we are dictated by Channel 7 when and what time to play our games ????
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |