by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:45 pm
by saintal » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:Someone should produce a half South, half Central guernsey. I'd wear that to the remaining North matches this year!
by topsywaldron » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:45 pm
Pseudo wrote:RB wrote:While I will never attend another Eagles game after this season, in order to show my approval of South and Central, I may attend a game between the two in the unlikely event that it is played within 30km of my house. A neutral game at e.g. Adelaide Oval would be appreciated...
Save a space for me.
Reckon that from here on these two clubs should compete for the Integrity Cup.
by JK » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:47 pm
zipzap wrote:"Key points of the agreement include:
- The AFC will pay an annual licence fee of $400,000 ($50,000 per SANFL club) to be indexed;
by dedja » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:48 pm
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:49 pm
by dedja » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:50 pm
JK wrote:zipzap wrote:"Key points of the agreement include:
- The AFC will pay an annual licence fee of $400,000 ($50,000 per SANFL club) to be indexed;
And if they want to own their own license, surely they have to pay this fee regardless of which comp they play in?
Funny that the SANFL several months ago regularly trotted out the line "The AFL reserves situation won't be addressed until the license buy back arrangements have been put in place".
by rod_rooster » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:51 pm
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:52 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Any chance the Dogs could entice Chris and James out of retirement just to play the games against the Crows? I very much doubt they'd need to be given any instructions, they'd know what to do...
by Macca19 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:52 pm
csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
by rod_rooster » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:55 pm
whufc wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Any chance the Dogs could entice Chris and James out of retirement just to play the games against the Crows? I very much doubt they'd need to be given any instructions, they'd know what to do...
Only if you lot let Joshy Coulter off the chain after massive weekend bender from him.
by Barto » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:55 pm
Macca19 wrote:csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
Personally, I think talk of memberships and crowds dropping by so much are being overstated. There might be a small drop, but for every person who hates this and refuses to go to games anymore there will be 99 who don't give a shit.
by topsywaldron » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:56 pm
Macca19 wrote:csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
Personally, I think talk of memberships and crowds dropping by so much are being overstated. There might be a small drop, but for every person who hates this and refuses to go to games anymore there will be 99 who don't give a shit.
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:58 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Macca19 wrote:csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
Personally, I think talk of memberships and crowds dropping by so much are being overstated. There might be a small drop, but for every person who hates this and refuses to go to games anymore there will be 99 who don't give a shit.
Bullshit.
by Pseudo » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:59 pm
Macca19 wrote:csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
Personally, I think talk of memberships and crowds dropping by so much are being overstated. There might be a small drop, but for every person who hates this and refuses to go to games anymore there will be 99 who don't give a shit.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:01 pm
Brodlach wrote:How many supporters will actually walk away from their club now that it is done and dusted? I doubt too many
by Dutchy » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:03 pm
by Brodlach » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:04 pm
whufc wrote:Hey guys i think you have the ladder wrong on the front page, should it read
P W L D PTS
1. South 2 2 0 0 4
2. Central 2 0 2 0 0
3. Norwood- who gives a f**k
4. North- who gives a f**k
5. Eagles- who gives a f**k
6. West- who gives a f**k
7. Sturt- who gives a f**k
8. Port- who gives a f**k
9. Glenelg- who gives a f**k
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by UK Fan » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:05 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by lesthemechanic » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:05 pm
Pseudo wrote:Macca19 wrote:csbowes wrote:So what are the league directors going to say next year when membership drops by 10-20 percent?
When crowds are down 20-30%?
It'll all be too late.
Personally, I think talk of memberships and crowds dropping by so much are being overstated. There might be a small drop, but for every person who hates this and refuses to go to games anymore there will be 99 who don't give a shit.
Macca, the ones who don't give a shit are the ones who pissed off to the Crows/Power years ago.
Those who remained have a little more spine than you give them credit for.
You know me. You reckon I'm bullshitting when I say I will never - NEVER - go to a Crows game in the SANFL?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |