by Brendan M » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:01 pm
by SDK » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:14 pm
by Reddeer » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
by StrayDog » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:56 pm
Reddeer wrote:Mr Rucci wasn't at the WWT members meeting so once again he makes it all up. I can't understand how he is the "chief sports writer" when there are journalists there!!!!
by klaan » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:18 pm
whufc wrote:Exactly could u imagine man united asking to their reserves in the championship or league one
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:20 pm
by LPH » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:23 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:33 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:A very reliable source confirmed the following from discussions on Friday The vote now stands at 5-2 with one undecided.
Two club directors changed their mind on Friday.
A list of demands was given to the SANFL on Friday which looks like being met by the Crows.
If all are met they will be over the line and not in the SAAFL.
On this basis two directors have confirmed that they will vote yes.
SAD DAY FOR THE SANFL. HANG YOUR HEADS IN SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by holden78 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:51 pm
by stan » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:02 pm
holden78 wrote:It's a done deal with the only issue the 8 sanfl clubs really need to sort out is making sure the Gayfl's don't get near a GF!
The top up players must come from the Ammo's only
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:04 pm
holden78 wrote:It's a done deal with the only issue the 8 sanfl clubs really need to sort out is making sure the Gayfl's don't get near a GF!
The top up players must come from the Ammo's only
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:05 pm
stan wrote:holden78 wrote:It's a done deal with the only issue the 8 sanfl clubs really need to sort out is making sure the Gayfl's don't get near a GF!
The top up players must come from the Ammo's only
I reckon you'll find that the top up players will come form the SANFL reserves.
by Pseudo » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:22 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote: The vote now stands at 5-2 with one undecided.
by stan » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:27 pm
Jim05 wrote:stan wrote:holden78 wrote:It's a done deal with the only issue the 8 sanfl clubs really need to sort out is making sure the Gayfl's don't get near a GF!
The top up players must come from the Ammo's only
I reckon you'll find that the top up players will come form the SANFL reserves.
Hopefully not.
I will be filthy if Norwood lets any of our players be used as top ups
by Strawb » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:15 pm
by dedja » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:17 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:27 pm
Strawb wrote:Saw Kochie after the AFL game in Geelong and told him No AFL in the SANFL. The muppet had no idea what I was on about. I told him as a West Adelaide supporter I don't want the crows or power reserves in our competition
by Strawb » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:44 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Strawb wrote:Saw Kochie after the AFL game in Geelong and told him No AFL in the SANFL. The muppet had no idea what I was on about. I told him as a West Adelaide supporter I don't want the crows or power reserves in our competition
Was his reply "why. But why. Why not. But why......."
by rod_rooster » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:55 pm
by whufc » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:58 pm
rod_rooster wrote:I'm coming to the realisation that as passionate as many of us are about this topic, there are far more people completely apathetic and willing to fall in line. Then there are those who are for it just to put the cherry on top. I hope i'm wrong but it feels to me that this comp is well and truly Fire Trucked!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |