D14 wrote:UK Fan wrote:Exactly hey crows fans have you ever heard anyone state the SANFL is currently compromise free.
This is a compromise to the leagues integrity we are not willing to accept . The it's already compromised argument doesn't mean jack.
Works both ways, SANFL fans can't use the compromised argument either if it doesn't mean jack.
Disagree with this. The SANFL have the chance to restore integrity back into the comp by removing all AFL listed players from the League teams. In my opinion, having two AFL reserves teams would lessen the integrity markedly from the status quo.
You've asked why do we/I think it shouldn't happen.
To me there's two sides of this issue with different reasons for each.
Concerning the issues with Port.
They are a foundation club of the SANFL, I don't want to see them get sold out by the Power. I don't think it's fair that the PAFC treat the Magpies as an AFL reserves team, portray them as still being the Magpies yet expect to field a team outside of the salary cap. It's either or, either the Magpies are an SANFL team and play by ALL the rules or they're not, can't have both. As a Sturt supporter it'd make me sick to see Sturt developed players playing for Port against Sturt for premiership points. No other SANFL team has this opportunity or ask to have salary cap exemptions.
Issues with Adelaide.
Whereas Port want to get top up players from the Magpies reserves and juniors Adelaide will need to source top up players from other SANFL clubs. They haven't explained how they expect this to work. So effectively AFC want to go from stuffing SANFL team selections around with available AFL players in the current model, to stuffing SANFL team selections with available SANFL players that AFC don't want or do want depending on injuries to AFL players.
Again, they want to field a team outside if the salary cap. The proposal of Adelaide to play all away games and give the gate to the host club is laughable, SANFL clubs have asked that they at least cover the gate but Chapman refused to do so. Sturt have huge set up costs to host a home game and therefore have the highest break even crowd of all SANFL teams, I think Sturt's break even crowd figure is about 3000. I can't see many Sturt supporters turning up to watch this game and I definitely can't see 2000-4000 Adelaide supporters turning up either. So Sturt stand to make a loss for every game they host against Adelaide. Yeh, errr, thanks but no thanks.
Other people have outlined very well the issues when it comes to finals. Personally I wouldn't care if both teams didn't play finals as part of the agreement, yes it's affects the integrity but what doesn't in these proposals? The problem with that is two years down the track they'll want to change that also. Death by a thousand cuts.
I hope that has given you some hard reasons of why I don't think it's beneficial to the SANFL.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.