Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Wedgie » Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:36 pm

Nor wood 9.12 66
Sturt 2.8 20
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby therisingblues » Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:40 pm

What a shellacking! It'd have to go close to Sturt's lowest score ever, if not our lowest vs Norwood.
I'd like to be gracious in defeat but would find it more gratifying to tell Fester to go **** himself.
:D That's better!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Jim05 » Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:48 pm

Great wet weather football by the Legs today
Umpires tried to keep Sturt in it
Aish played like the conditions were perfect, has to be a top 3 draft pick. All class.
Very happy to get the win, now to concentrate on West next week
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48093
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3788 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby fester69 » Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:42 pm

therisingblues wrote:What a shellacking! It'd have to go close to Sturt's lowest score ever, if not our lowest vs Norwood.
I'd like to be gracious in defeat but would find it more gratifying to tell Fester to go **** himself.
:D That's better!


Puts a smile on my face and yes it was your lowest ever score against us!
Only one word to say - "Georgy! Georgy! Georgy! Georgy!"
Last edited by fester69 on Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fester69
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:09 pm
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 32 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby SpionKopster » Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:24 pm

Another Shut Out!

Love it!
Fortis in Procella
SpionKopster
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:10 am
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:25 pm

Poor performance by Sturt. Showed the difference in class between us and the top team.

Harms, Coad, Panozzo played well for us.
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
User avatar
Cambridge Clarrie
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:55 pm

Norwood gave us an absolute lesson in wet weather football.
For whatever reason, we refuse to adjust to the conditions and that is regardless of whether the coach is Carman, Phillips, McGowan, Norman or Maloney.
Umpiring had zero bearing on the result despite what some have said.
R.I.P. Patrice Lumumba 1925 - 1961
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3261
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby southee » Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:56 pm

1 goal at 3 quarter time for Sturt. :shock:

Big concerns.
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:00 pm

southee wrote:1 goal at 3 quarter time for Sturt. :shock:

Big concerns.


Nice try Southee. Nothing like the concerns down Noarlunga way where the rumours around Ron's position at the club continue to circulate... Four years into a five year contract and you'll miss finals yet again...
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
User avatar
Cambridge Clarrie
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Jimmy » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:20 pm

Didn't expect much different. On to the eagles next week.
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby prowling panther » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:26 pm

Jimmy wrote:Didn't expect much different. On to the eagles next week.


That will be a concern as well.

South have North next week.

That will be a concern as well.
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
User avatar
prowling panther
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:04 am
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 28 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Pseudo » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:32 pm

prowling panther wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Didn't expect much different. On to the eagles next week.


That will be a concern as well.

South have North next week.

That will be a concern as well.


Glenelg has a game next week.

That will be a concern as well.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12165
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1638 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby leggies » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:35 pm

Pseudo wrote:
prowling panther wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Didn't expect much different. On to the eagles next week.


That will be a concern as well.

South have North next week.

That will be a concern as well.


Glenelg has a game next week.

That will be a concern as well.

At least they might get a draw against the bye! ;)
leggies
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:59 am
Has liked: 85 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby prowling panther » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:36 pm

leggies wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
prowling panther wrote:
Jimmy wrote:Didn't expect much different. On to the eagles next week.


That will be a concern as well.

South have North next week.

That will be a concern as well.


Glenelg has a game next week.

That will be a concern as well.

At least they might get a draw against the bye! ;)



Now that would confuse us all :roll: :roll:
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
User avatar
prowling panther
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:04 am
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 28 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Jim05 » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:44 pm

ORDoubleBlues wrote:Norwood gave us an absolute lesson in wet weather football.
For whatever reason, we refuse to adjust to the conditions and that is regardless of whether the coach is Carman, Phillips, McGowan, Norman or Maloney.
Umpiring had zero bearing on the result despite what some have said.

Not the result but definately the margin, terrible decision to gift you your second goal and one of many baffling decisions today. They were terrible, first half especially was diabolical
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48093
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3788 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:51 pm

Jim05 wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:Norwood gave us an absolute lesson in wet weather football.
For whatever reason, we refuse to adjust to the conditions and that is regardless of whether the coach is Carman, Phillips, McGowan, Norman or Maloney.
Umpiring had zero bearing on the result despite what some have said.

Not the result but definately the margin, terrible decision to gift you your second goal and one of many baffling decisions today. They were terrible, first half especially was diabolical


In particular the free to Dawe against Hombsch.
R.I.P. Patrice Lumumba 1925 - 1961
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3261
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby Jim05 » Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:04 am

ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:Norwood gave us an absolute lesson in wet weather football.
For whatever reason, we refuse to adjust to the conditions and that is regardless of whether the coach is Carman, Phillips, McGowan, Norman or Maloney.
Umpiring had zero bearing on the result despite what some have said.

Not the result but definately the margin, terrible decision to gift you your second goal and one of many baffling decisions today. They were terrible, first half especially was diabolical


In particular the free to Dawe against Hombsch.

That was laughable
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48093
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3788 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby wildcat » Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:06 am

ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:Norwood gave us an absolute lesson in wet weather football.
For whatever reason, we refuse to adjust to the conditions and that is regardless of whether the coach is Carman, Phillips, McGowan, Norman or Maloney.
Umpiring had zero bearing on the result despite what some have said.

Not the result but definately the margin, terrible decision to gift you your second goal and one of many baffling decisions today. They were terrible, first half especially was diabolical


In particular the free to Dawe against Hombsch.


So you're saying that the umpiring was so bad that it cost Strut ;) the game? :twisted:
wildcat
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:11 am
Location: Under your bed
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Payneham NU

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby prowling panther » Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:08 am

are the Umpires actually accountable to anyone. It does not appear to be. I do know they were only marked on the wrong decisions they actually made, not on the obvious ones they missed, at one time, has it changed at all?
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
User avatar
prowling panther
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:04 am
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 28 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

Re: Round 16 - Norwood v Sturt - POST MATCH DISCUSSION

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:20 am

All jokes aside, I've seen them worse but I will reiterate that Norwood did give us a wet weather lesson and hopefully after 15 years we might actually learn how to play wet weather football.
R.I.P. Patrice Lumumba 1925 - 1961
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3261
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |