AFL Reserves Discussion...

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Are you in favour of the proposal for the Crows Reserves to join the SANFL League competition?

Yes
35
17%
No
148
74%
Not fussed either way
18
9%
 
Total votes : 201

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby CENTURION » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:30 am

A healthy SANFL = a healthy AFL. Just wait until The AFL has an up and running reserves comp, then the SANFL will be preserved & will become healthier!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby UK Fan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:12 am

TimmiesChin wrote:
UK Fan wrote:
TimmiesChin wrote:
Jim05 wrote:That would be my preferred option.
I think it works quiet well ATM, obviously some minor issues that could be handled better but I think in terms of development it works well


That seems to then suggest ports proposal is 'closer' to what you want than the crows.... the only difference in ports and your model being where about a dozen AFL reserves players play each week?



What would port fans prefer

A) Port reserves take over port magpies in SANFL but you lose reserves, 18s , 16s plus recruiting zones.

B) Port Magpies removed from league. Port power reserves compete in SANFL reserves. You keep 18s 16s and traditional recruiting zones(something crows won't have).


Well Let's be honest, if there is no league side, there's very little point in underage sides as there's no longer a pathway.

Both options also mean less players involved in sanfl footy at senior level as there are less places available.

Would you be happy if the current arrangement continued as is?


Yep I'm happy with current structure.

I don't want the maggies to die but unfortunately it seems inevitable that your AFL club will sacrifice you for the greater good. Which was inevitable as soon as the one club merger was approved IMHO !!
Last edited by UK Fan on Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1284 times
Been liked: 558 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby beenreal » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:16 am

kickinit wrote:um port only want to move the players they pay and some they have recruited from interstate in their team. The SANFL clubs are the ones that want to get rid off Port's zone. Do you seriously think removing 100 kids from your jnr's is good for the league. Hey I understand if port could recruit directly from their jnr's that it would be a issue, but with the national draft they can't do. The SANFL can't give a reason because they don't have one for it.


They can spruik on about their many versions of "uncompromised" and "integrity" all they like. Reality is they constantly accuse us of being selfish but it's all about creating an opportunity to get their grubby hands on our zones.

I love how it's all about the poor downtrodden youth of the Lefevre Peninsula who now won't get a look-in at senior level because of all of Port's AFL-listed players, but the Gowans Twins migrate from Melbourne and elbow their way through 10+ years of league football as nothing more than highly-paid mercenaries and no-one cries tears for Staxon de Mille and Doug Deep of Tanunda who surely would've played 500 games between them instead.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby on the rails » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:20 am

beenreal - go and look up what the other AFL Clubs have re zones and junior set ups - they don't!

As for interstate ex AFL or VFL players - how many have the PAFC got over the years and how many presently play in the Magpie side keeping local players out! You really are clutching at straws now using that as part of the argument!
Last edited by on the rails on Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby UK Fan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:22 am

kickinit wrote:um port only want to move the players they pay and some they have recruited from interstate in their team. The SANFL clubs are the ones that want to get rid off Port's zone. Do you seriously think removing 100 kids from your jnr's is good for the league. Hey I understand if port could recruit directly from their jnr's that it would be a issue, but with the national draft they can't do. The SANFL can't give a reason because they don't have one for it.




Anybody else predicting kickedinhead is going to regurgitate his 100 kids out of SANFL claim rainman style for another 5 pages.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1284 times
Been liked: 558 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby TimmiesChin » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:49 am

UK Fan wrote:Yep I'm happy with current structure.

I don't want the maggies to die but unfortunately it seems inevitable that your AFL club will sacrifice you for the greater good. Which was inevitable as soon as the one club merger was approved IMHO !!



See, I too could live with the current situation, and its a better option for me than disbanding the magpies.

I would though propose that when new players were brought into the state via AFL drafts, that the mini draft was split down the middle with only the Crows father/son aligned clubs able to select Crows players, and similar for Port. That way you get more of a critical mass of Port/Crows players at individual SANFL clubs, which makes it easier for development officers to do their job and encourages the fostering of relationships between AFL and SANFL clubs. Perhaps the AFL aligned players could then be "swapped" between these clubs on a needs basis - rather than players being 'moved'. So if Centrals were aligned to the Power and had a surplus of onballers, but needed a tall, and the Eagles had a surplus of talls and needed an onballer, they could swap an AFL listed tall for an AFL listed onballer.

That being said, my point earlier was that the proposed Port model seems a lot closer to the status quo than the Crows model, which seems to call for the Crows to "borrow" players from SANFL clubs to make up their list. I'm not arguing whether AFL players should be in the SANFL or not, but arguing which model has bigger impact on the SANFL.

Imagine the case where they have 4 or 5 Eagles players filling in for them, the Crows are playing West and a win would knock the Eagles out the 5.... I can't imagine the Eagles players giving their all.

I just feel that players should be aligned to a club for an entire season rather than floating between SANFL club and AFL top up.

- - - - - - - - -

I would have thought that a model with less impact (if reserves AFL sides is decided as the way to go) was that the Crows/Port BOTH had full sides in all grades.
Set it up so that only 14 AFL listed players could play league at any given time (which would usually be the case I would think).
Take the port recruiting zone and share it with the crows (perhaps reduce it somewhat if needed, but I'd imagine both clubs having half the recruiting zone of other SANFL clubs wouldn't be far off). Prevent Port/Crows from recruiting players to SANFL from interstate, or from other clubs.
Reduce the salary cap, and have the AFL clubs contribute funds to allow the other clubs salary cap to be expanded by 10/20% to allow them to recruit players to replace the AFL listed players they lose. (because ultimately, if the AFL aligned players get pulled, each club is losing 4/5 regular senior players).
This also means there would be 10 sides in all grades, so no weird draw where either reserve sides played two byes a round and it becomes difficult to create an even draw .....
TimmiesChin
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:22 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:58 am

kickinit wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
kickinit wrote:um port only want to move the players they pay and some they have recruited from interstate in their team. The SANFL clubs are the ones that want to get rid off Port's zone. Do you seriously think removing 100 kids from your jnr's is good for the league. Hey I understand if port could recruit directly from their jnr's that it would be a issue, but with the national draft they can't do. The SANFL can't give a reason because they don't have one for it.


Once again, the SANFL don't have to give a reason. It's up to Port and the Crows to convince the SANFL as to why things should change. It is the AFL clubs trying to convince the SANFL to do something not the other way around.

Basically, the two AFL clubs are trying to force something on the SANFL. If they say no the reason isn't important. No means NO.


Um so your saying it the crows or power pushing for port to lose the jnr sides? No it's the sanfl clubs trying to force this on port, that's why according to what you have said the sanfl need to convince us why this is needed


Are you that thick? The whole process for any change is being driven by the Crows and Port. Why does the SANFL have to justify anything? All that has been debated is that if Port wish to make these changes then something has to give. There is always the option open to them to decide that keeping the status quo will do. Once again the SANFL aren't the ones trying to change anything. If Port lose their zones, sell their soul etc. it's Port's doing, not the SANFL's.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby am Bays » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:07 am

Oh FFFS!!

Give 'em reserves teams, all their listed players and the Crows top up players from the u/18s not selected in other clubs league teams. Both reserve teams play in the SANFL ressies competition.

Port keep their zone and the Magpies play as the league team - their juniors still have a pathway to their AFL team - even though we know it's not the case but if they want to believe it who am I to stop them....
Crows get a reserves team and save truck loads of cash having to fly ressies players to an interstate competition
SANFL league competition integrity improved (not having to play AFL listed players in it).

Not what every one wants but everyone still wins.

How hard is it???
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19751
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2126 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby areaman » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:18 am

beenreal wrote:They can spruik on about their many versions of "uncompromised" and "integrity" all they like. Reality is they constantly accuse us of being selfish but it's all about creating an opportunity to get their grubby hands on our zones.

Spot on. The 8 SANFL clubs have been secretly lobbying the Crows and Power to put in proposals to join the SANFL so we can get our hands on 1/8th of Port's recruiting zone.

The game's up people. We've been found out.

In other news, Elvis is still alive and the US Government faked the moon landing.
User avatar
areaman
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:30 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby Booney » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:34 am

am Bays wrote:Oh FFFS!!

Give 'em reserves teams, all their listed players and the Crows top up players from the u/18s not selected in other clubs league teams. Both reserve teams play in the SANFL ressies competition.

Port keep their zone and the Magpies play as the league team - their juniors still have a pathway to their AFL team - even though we know it's not the case but if they want to believe it who am I to stop them....
Crows get a reserves team and save truck loads of cash having to fly ressies players to an interstate competition
SANFL league competition integrity improved (not having to play AFL listed players in it).

Not what every one wants but everyone still wins.

How hard is it???


There it is folks. I dont think anyone would argue with this.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61692
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8210 times
Been liked: 11941 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby UK Fan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:40 am

am Bays wrote:Oh FFFS!!

Give 'em reserves teams, all their listed players and the Crows top up players from the u/18s not selected in other clubs league teams. Both reserve teams play in the SANFL ressies competition.

Port keep their zone and the Magpies play as the league team - their juniors still have a pathway to their AFL team - even though we know it's not the case but if they want to believe it who am I to stop them....
Crows get a reserves team and save truck loads of cash having to fly ressies players to an interstate competition
SANFL league competition integrity improved (not having to play AFL listed players in it).

Not what every one wants but everyone still wins.

How hard is it???


Its not hard at all. You just vote "no".
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1284 times
Been liked: 558 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby gossipgirl » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:41 am

heres a solution thats a win win for everyone. I propose all power players and crows players play for the bays and we can then top up with essendon players that may not be playing next year. this way the bays may eventually win another game.

perhaps hirdy could replace massie as the coach as well.

you know it makes sense :shock:
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1539 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby Apachebulldog » Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:58 am

Heres another suggestion lets top them u[ with players from maybe the American AFL or maybe the Danish league
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby dedja » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:09 am

Lingerie Football League ...
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja … my yes be yes, my no be no
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24401
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 794 times
Been liked: 1702 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby UK Fan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:24 am

Booney wrote:
am Bays wrote:Oh FFFS!!

Give 'em reserves teams, all their listed players and the Crows top up players from the u/18s not selected in other clubs league teams. Both reserve teams play in the SANFL ressies competition.

Port keep their zone and the Magpies play as the league team - their juniors still have a pathway to their AFL team - even though we know it's not the case but if they want to believe it who am I to stop them....
Crows get a reserves team and save truck loads of cash having to fly ressies players to an interstate competition
SANFL league competition integrity improved (not having to play AFL listed players in it).

Not what every one wants but everyone still wins.

How hard is it???


There it is folks. I dont think anyone would argue with this.


Myself and a few SANFL presidents would
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1284 times
Been liked: 558 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby Booney » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:33 am

UK Fan wrote:
Booney wrote:
am Bays wrote:Oh FFFS!!
Give 'em reserves teams, all their listed players and the Crows top up players from the u/18s not selected in other clubs league teams. Both reserve teams play in the SANFL ressies competition.
Port keep their zone and the Magpies play as the league team - their juniors still have a pathway to their AFL team - even though we know it's not the case but if they want to believe it who am I to stop them....
Crows get a reserves team and save truck loads of cash having to fly ressies players to an interstate competition
SANFL league competition integrity improved (not having to play AFL listed players in it).
Not what every one wants but everyone still wins.
How hard is it???

There it is folks. I dont think anyone would argue with this.

Myself and a few SANFL presidents would


Well, I guess I'd respect a few of those opinions then.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61692
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8210 times
Been liked: 11941 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:43 am

beenreal wrote: I love how it's all about the poor downtrodden youth of the Lefevre Peninsula who now won't get a look-in at senior level because of all of Port's AFL-listed players, but the Gowans Twins migrate from Melbourne and elbow their way through 10+ years of league football as nothing more than highly-paid mercenaries and no-one cries tears for Staxon de Mille and Doug Deep of Tanunda who surely would've played 500 games between them instead.


Yeah, because SANFL clubs have never recruited before. There's a difference between AFL-listed players and recruiting.

Sorry, Russell Johnston, sorry, Spiro and Tony, sorry, Bomber, sorry Jack and Fos, you blokes were only highly-paid mercenaries.

Biff Merchant, from Semaphore, and Grave Danger Jnr, of 35 Dragged Up By the Bootstraps Street, Alberton, missed out on Magpie glory, while you blokes elbowed your way through 10+ years of league football glory and became part of the Port Adelaide tradition.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby RB » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:28 pm

gossipgirl wrote:heres a solution thats a win win for everyone. I propose all power players and crows players play for the bays and we can then top up with essendon players that may not be playing next year. this way the bays may eventually win another game.

perhaps hirdy could replace massie as the coach as well.

you know it makes sense :shock:

Nah, Matthew Knights! You know you want him! :lol:
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 6209
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 871 times
Been liked: 1272 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby Dutchy » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:46 pm

What is the point of Port Magpies keeping their zone and juniors if they cannot develop into the league team that is clogged with AFL listed players?

Anyone thought about the players themselves that will be trapped in Port's zone with their ambitions of playing league or AFL being hampered by a league team that wants to simply develop its AFL players? I can see many of these players requesting transfers to other SANFL clubs and these support teams at the Magpies being filled with players that wont make a higher grade and therefore getting pumped every week. How does that make sense?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46251
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4314 times

Re: AFL Reserves Discussion...

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:47 pm

RB wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:heres a solution thats a win win for everyone. I propose all power players and crows players play for the bays and we can then top up with essendon players that may not be playing next year. this way the bays may eventually win another game.

perhaps hirdy could replace massie as the coach as well.

you know it makes sense :shock:

Nah, Matthew Knights! You know you want him! :lol:


Current VFL Premiership coach
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60962
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13446 times
Been liked: 4646 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |