JK wrote:Shithouse treatment of Jobe Watson, but FFS I wish the commentators would STFU now .. Theyve said their bit on it, but dont go on about it all effin game
Haven't heard them mention it once.......
Since I started writing this post.
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:33 pm
JK wrote:Shithouse treatment of Jobe Watson, but FFS I wish the commentators would STFU now .. Theyve said their bit on it, but dont go on about it all effin game
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:34 pm
JK wrote:Shithouse treatment of Jobe Watson, but FFS I wish the commentators would STFU now .. Theyve said their bit on it, but dont go on about it all effin game
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:37 pm
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:39 pm
Johno6 wrote:JK wrote:Shithouse treatment of Jobe Watson, but FFS I wish the commentators would STFU now .. Theyve said their bit on it, but dont go on about it all effin game
Haven't heard them mention it once.......
Since I started writing this post.
by Spargo » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:39 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
Cant remember anything at the time saying he was guilty?
Got banned for nothing did he?
by Johno6 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:39 pm
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:41 pm
helicopterking wrote:JK wrote:Shithouse treatment of Jobe Watson, but FFS I wish the commentators would STFU now .. Theyve said their bit on it, but dont go on about it all effin game
They are not even calling the game now.
Do they realise its going to happen for the rest of the game and the crowd cant hear them
by whufc » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:42 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
Cant remember anything at the time saying he was guilty?
Got banned for nothing did he?
by daysofourlives » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:44 pm
by daysofourlives » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:47 pm
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:49 pm
by whufc » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:49 pm
daysofourlives wrote:If anything is disgraceful its the commentators sticking up for their mate Jobe, FFS he admitted guilt. Give it a rest he shouldnt be out there. simple as that.
If Milne came out and said yeah i raped the girl he would be in gaol by now, whats the difference???
Piss weak from the AFL
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:59 pm
JK wrote:Goddard been worth his price tag tonight (not)
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:00 pm
whufc wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:[quote="whufc"]Is it correct to say one is a player who used performance enhancing drugs, the other is a player who was addicted to more than likely a performance decreasing drug.
I would say there is a tad of difference between the two.
Banned substance is a banned substance. One was found guilty, one is yet to, and may not be.
Cant remember anything at the time saying he was guilty?
Got banned for nothing did he?
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:03 pm
by whufc » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:04 pm
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:07 pm
by JK » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:08 pm
by helicopterking » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:10 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |