by CENTURION » Mon May 13, 2013 12:58 pm
by heater31 » Mon May 13, 2013 1:02 pm
CENTURION wrote:Just spoke with Chris Davies, he doesn't know why Eric was assaulted by WESLO on the weekend but will find out & let me know, furthermore, in respect to the rumour that The ABC have been instructed not to show Eric, that directive hasn't come from Chris or anyone at the SANFL.
by CENTURION » Mon May 13, 2013 1:17 pm
by smac » Mon May 13, 2013 2:14 pm
CENTURION wrote:yes, he is contacting WESLO to find out what went wrong.
by Dutchy » Mon May 13, 2013 2:22 pm
kickinit wrote:
how do we abuse the SANFl rules. The SANFL have set up a set of rules and we have never broken any of them. Unless you can provide evidence that we have you have nothing to argue with.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 13, 2013 2:37 pm
Big Phil wrote:heater31 wrote:Port just seem to shift players because one of theirs is not getting a league game in the midfield because he is not up to standard.
Then to make even more of a mockery of said situation, one player ended up playing Reserves within a fortnight of being switched to the Magpies...
by kickinit » Mon May 13, 2013 2:44 pm
Dutchy wrote:kickinit wrote:
how do we abuse the SANFl rules. The SANFL have set up a set of rules and we have never broken any of them. Unless you can provide evidence that we have you have nothing to argue with.
Evidence enough? ->
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/news.php?news_id=915
by Spargo » Mon May 13, 2013 2:50 pm
CENTURION wrote:yes, he is contacting WESLO to find out what went wrong.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 13, 2013 2:51 pm
by Wedgie » Mon May 13, 2013 3:07 pm
kickinit wrote:so does that mean people are now not going to watch the sanfl when they west and norwood?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Spargo » Mon May 13, 2013 3:12 pm
Wedgie wrote:kickinit wrote:so does that mean people are now not going to watch the sanfl when they west and norwood?
Pineapples
by Dutchy » Mon May 13, 2013 4:26 pm
kickinit wrote:Dutchy wrote:kickinit wrote:
how do we abuse the SANFl rules. The SANFL have set up a set of rules and we have never broken any of them. Unless you can provide evidence that we have you have nothing to argue with.
Evidence enough? ->
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/news.php?news_id=915
so does that mean people are now not going to watch the sanfl when they west and norwood?
by Dogwatcher » Mon May 13, 2013 4:32 pm
by heater31 » Mon May 13, 2013 4:36 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Would that be the game where, if you believe some, the Crows became premiership fancies again?
by CENTURION » Mon May 13, 2013 4:36 pm
Spargo wrote:Wedgie wrote:kickinit wrote:so does that mean people are now not going to watch the sanfl when they west and norwood?
Pineapples
Sandpaper
by UK Fan » Mon May 13, 2013 4:39 pm
beenreal wrote:kickinit wrote:Jim05 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:
The "one team doesn't care about winning" thing is complete bullshit.
Dont agree
As a member of Essendon for 30+ years and going to numerous reserves game I can tell you the club does not give a crap about the reserves winning. The supporters might but the club doesnt. The senior coach tells the reserves coach what position and what ammount of game time each player plays, winning is purely secondary. The ammount of Bendigo/Essendon games ive been too where players are played out of position or only play 10-15 minutes is unbelievable.
but because that's the way essendon is does it automatically mean the crows and port will be the same.
Listened to the Geelong CEO on 3AW a couple of weeks ago talking about not only how pleased they were to be 5-0 but also how proud they were as a club because their Reserves were also sitting top of the ladder at 5-0 too.
Certainly sounded like they care.
For the record, I disagree with the sign but I have a genuine problem with the inability to display it at SANFL venues.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Mon May 13, 2013 5:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:kickinit wrote:Dutchy wrote:kickinit wrote:how do we abuse the SANFl rules. The SANFL have set up a set of rules and we have never broken any of them. Unless you can provide evidence that we have you have nothing to argue with.
Evidence enough? ->
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/news.php?news_id=915
so does that mean people are now not going to watch the sanfl when they west and norwood?
Huh? Just admit you were wrong.
BTW you say the AFL is growing and SANFL is dying, yet the SANFL are drawing more people to some games than one particular AFL game on the weekend.
by smac » Mon May 13, 2013 5:03 pm
Spargo wrote:CENTURION wrote:yes, he is contacting WESLO to find out what went wrong.
He should be contacting weslo to relieve them of their duties (or lack of) and find a more professional company.
by Booney » Mon May 13, 2013 5:05 pm
smac wrote:Spargo wrote:CENTURION wrote:yes, he is contacting WESLO to find out what went wrong.
He should be contacting weslo to relieve them of their duties (or lack of) and find a more professional company.
And when they appoint a different provider, who will that company hire to fill their new contract?
by Dutchy » Mon May 13, 2013 5:25 pm
Booney wrote:
Not defending kickinit ( by any means ) but to use a GWS home crowd to highlight AFL attendances is folly.
Probably should be more concerned about how many were at the SANFL "showcase" on the weekend.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |