scoob wrote:As far as I can read into it, none of the injected supplement are on the banned list.
How is this then doping? If its not banned then they have done nothing wrong.
They are on ASADA's 2013 prohibited substances list.
by Q. » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:28 pm
scoob wrote:As far as I can read into it, none of the injected supplement are on the banned list.
How is this then doping? If its not banned then they have done nothing wrong.
by scoob » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:30 pm
Q. wrote:scoob wrote:As far as I can read into it, none of the injected supplement are on the banned list.
How is this then doping? If its not banned then they have done nothing wrong.
They are on ASADA's 2013 prohibited substances list.
by Q. » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:34 pm
scoob wrote:Q. wrote:scoob wrote:As far as I can read into it, none of the injected supplement are on the banned list.
How is this then doping? If its not banned then they have done nothing wrong.
They are on ASADA's 2013 prohibited substances list.
All of them? When were they administered?
by scoob » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:37 pm
Q. wrote:scoob wrote:Q. wrote:scoob wrote:As far as I can read into it, none of the injected supplement are on the banned list.
How is this then doping? If its not banned then they have done nothing wrong.
They are on ASADA's 2013 prohibited substances list.
All of them? When were they administered?
WADA has had peptides covered for years, ASADA wouldn't be any different.
by Q. » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:42 pm
scoob wrote:Q. wrote:WADA has had peptides covered for years, ASADA wouldn't be any different.
On 7.30 Last night they made a point saying that all the supplements mentioned in the texts between bates and dank were legal (even though many were being considered for the ban list).
by scoob » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:46 pm
Q. wrote:scoob wrote:Q. wrote:WADA has had peptides covered for years, ASADA wouldn't be any different.
On 7.30 Last night they made a point saying that all the supplements mentioned in the texts between bates and dank were legal (even though many were being considered for the ban list).
No worries, I haven't read that list. Do you have it?
I was referring to Hexarelin and GHRP-6, which is what Essendon is under scrutiny for.
by Q. » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:42 pm
scoob wrote:http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/melbourne-insists-its-clean-in-statement-responding-to-links-to-stephen-dank/story-e6frg6n6-1226624030375
by stan » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:47 pm
by gadj1976 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:32 pm
by kickinit » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:18 am
by kickinit » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:20 am
Q. wrote:scoob wrote:http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/melbourne-insists-its-clean-in-statement-responding-to-links-to-stephen-dank/story-e6frg6n6-1226624030375
Thanks.
You are right, doesn't appear to be anything prohibited there.
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:30 am
by Media Park » Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:35 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by kickinit » Sat Apr 20, 2013 9:08 am
Media Park wrote:just think how bad Melbourne would be without the supplements.
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 20, 2013 9:14 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |