Southern Football League

A forum dedicated to the Southern Football League!

Postby WHEELS&DEALS » Thu May 24, 2007 11:57 pm

tips time
porties by 15 goals plus
winies by 6 goals
flaggies by 3 goals
cove to kick over 50 goals smackam to sqeeze in 1
bumbers by 8 goals
emus by 20 goals
valley by 10 goals, parks should kick more than 1 this week.
WHEELS&DEALS
Under 16s
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Down the Road
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 18 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Postby Old and Grey » Fri May 25, 2007 10:22 am

Swooper16 wrote:Hackham shouldnt be allowed into senior comp until they get a good juniors program up and running again. Morphy Parks should try with amateurs - sure you need to start at div 7 but at least they would be competitive.

Pretty harsh but they are continually bringing the standard of SFL footy down and havent shown any sign of improvement for the past 5 seasons.


I don't think you can just lay the responsibility at the foot of these clubs or even Marion (1 junior side) & Lonsdale (who have no junior sides), the SFL should be more accountable for this situation every week. To continually allow clubs to have dual sides in each age group as a feeding ground to seniors for the future while others have none is just ridiculous. It's interesting to see MV has 2 sides in U18, U16 & U14 with 1 side dominating and the other floundering at the foot of the ladder. Similar situation for Happy Valley in the U16s & U14s. Cove, Reynella and Brighton having their 2nd sides play on Sundays.

Demographics of clubs also plays a part in this. Hackham is only 2kms from Morphett Vale. Morphettville Park is in an area where they compete against 8 other clubs (2 of which are Div 2 clubs)for the same senior and junior players. Marion is in the same boat as M/Park. Aldinga compete against 4 or 5 other clubs for players. Lonsdale find themselves in no mans land at times, while Cove have had the biggest influx of kids etc in the last 5 years with all the housing development going on in the area.

As long as this continues the blowouts will remain. Why wouldn't you suggest the M/Vales or the Coves go to amateurs so they can get a competitive game? All seem to think M/Vale could hold their own in Div 1!
Old and Grey
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 9:44 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby THE BOSS » Fri May 25, 2007 10:32 am

Well said Old and Grey, your not Grey yet are ya ???????
THE BOSS
Rookie
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Junior » Fri May 25, 2007 10:34 am

Zelezny Chucks wrote:
Charlie wrote:surely a reported player shouldn;t be allowed to play until the report has been delt with. The SFL should have delt with it on Tuesday /Wednesday after the game.


You can't just assume that he was guilty I agree it should have been dealt with after the weekend it happened but while Flaggies feel hard done by because he played what if he didnt play the result went the other way and then he was cleared this week? A team like Christies needs all the wins it can get to make the 8.
Also, a similar incident happened in a Lonsdale Morphett Vale game last year with the Pres of the Lions making the complaint! I think the Emus B's coach wasn't even called before the tribunal until finals time even thought the incident happened mid-season? The only officials that should be able to have any say from the sidelines in these matters are SFL officials club officials should have no say in filing reports! What happens on the field stays on the field! And thats my two cents!


I reckon it's a little bit different if it's a club official actually throwing the dog shot! Such as the bloke from M/Vale. But in saying that it must be dealt with that week or not at all?
User avatar
Junior
Rookie
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:16 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: OSB Lonsdale

Postby bass_player » Fri May 25, 2007 11:10 am

Zelezny Chucks

Charlie wrote:
surely a reported player shouldn;t be allowed to play until the report has been delt with. The SFL should have delt with it on Tuesday /Wednesday after the game.


You can't just assume that he was guilty I agree it should have been dealt with after the weekend it happened but while Flaggies feel hard done by because he played what if he didnt play the result went the other way and then he was cleared this week? A team like Christies needs all the wins it can get to make the 8.
Also, a similar incident happened in a Lonsdale Morphett Vale game last year with the Pres of the Lions making the complaint! I think the Emus B's coach wasn't even called before the tribunal until finals time even thought the incident happened mid-season? The only officials that should be able to have any say from the sidelines in these matters are SFL officials club officials should have no say in filing reports! What happens on the field stays on the field! And thats my two cents!


It was actually the Morphett Vale timekeeper who came forward and said that she would like to put a report in with the Lions as she thought that the act by the Morphett Vale B grade coach was disgusting. Should never be allowed to coach again in my opinion. No one should be able to deliberately knee an opposing player in the head when they are on the ground, especially if you're an official.
bass_player
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:17 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: OSB Lonsdale

Postby Zelezny Chucks » Fri May 25, 2007 11:25 am

bass_player wrote:
Zelezny Chucks

Charlie wrote:
surely a reported player shouldn;t be allowed to play until the report has been delt with. The SFL should have delt with it on Tuesday /Wednesday after the game.


You can't just assume that he was guilty I agree it should have been dealt with after the weekend it happened but while Flaggies feel hard done by because he played what if he didnt play the result went the other way and then he was cleared this week? A team like Christies needs all the wins it can get to make the 8.
Also, a similar incident happened in a Lonsdale Morphett Vale game last year with the Pres of the Lions making the complaint! I think the Emus B's coach wasn't even called before the tribunal until finals time even thought the incident happened mid-season? The only officials that should be able to have any say from the sidelines in these matters are SFL officials club officials should have no say in filing reports! What happens on the field stays on the field! And thats my two cents!


It was actually the Morphett Vale timekeeper who came forward and said that she would like to put a report in with the Lions as she thought that the act by the Morphett Vale B grade coach was disgusting. Should never be allowed to coach again in my opinion. No one should be able to deliberately knee an opposing player in the head when they are on the ground, especially if you're an official.


I'm not defending the act I wasn't there but if it was such a blatant thing then the umpires would have seen it isn't it there job t report on these things? Also if they were disgusted with it what took so long to take action? If an offence is committed then it should be dealt with that week not 10 weeks later seems like the league needs to get off its ass and set some guidelines otherwise officials are gonna be reporting people left right and centre.
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 95 times
Grassroots Team: Morphett Vale

Postby bass_player » Fri May 25, 2007 11:49 am

I totally agree. It should have been dealt with that week. The league seems to just sit on these things hoping people will forget and it will go away.

As for the umpires, I think most of them just turn a blind eye to reportable incidents otherwise they have to complete paperwork and show up to a tribunal hearing during the week. They either don't have the time, or can't be bothered.
bass_player
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:17 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: OSB Lonsdale

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Fri May 25, 2007 12:20 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are Hangin' Tough.


While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Postby THE BOSS » Fri May 25, 2007 12:57 pm

bass_player wrote:I totally agree. It should have been dealt with that week. The league seems to just sit on these things hoping people will forget and it will go away.

As for the umpires, I think most of them just turn a blind eye to reportable incidents otherwise they have to complete paperwork and show up to a tribunal hearing during the week. They either don't have the time, or can't be bothered.


Don't the umps get a bonus if some one is found guilty ?????
If so you would think that they would do the paperwork etc etc.
THE BOSS
Rookie
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby WHEELS&DEALS » Fri May 25, 2007 2:08 pm

The umpires can't even get right the colour tops they should be wearing, they have been told every week that when they umpire morphy parks they are to don the whites, but after 5 rounds they have managed to remember once. Why did they change colours? Is it because they want to be noticed more, there poor performance and decision making makes them stand out enough, consistency is all we ask.
WHEELS&DEALS
Under 16s
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Down the Road
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 18 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Postby The Mexican » Fri May 25, 2007 2:38 pm

ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are Hangin' Tough.


While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.


Seems we are all in agreeance the NKOTB has certainly "Got the Right Stuff.... Baby..."
Viva La Raza..!!!
User avatar
The Mexican
Under 18s
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:59 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Zelezny Chucks » Fri May 25, 2007 2:39 pm

WHEELS&DEALS wrote:The umpires can't even get right the colour tops they should be wearing, they have been told every week that when they umpire morphy parks they are to don the whites, but after 5 rounds they have managed to remember once. Why did they change colours? Is it because they want to be noticed more, there poor performance and decision making makes them stand out enough, consistency is all we ask.


its the blind leading the blind out there all have different interpretations of the rules and some dont even know the rules
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 95 times
Grassroots Team: Morphett Vale

Postby Buff » Fri May 25, 2007 3:12 pm

[quote="Zelezny Chucks"][quote="bass_player"][quote]Zelezny Chucks

Charlie wrote:
surely a reported player shouldn;t be allowed to play until the report has been delt with. The SFL should have delt with it on Tuesday /Wednesday after the game.


You can't just assume that he was guilty I agree it should have been dealt with after the weekend it happened but while Flaggies feel hard done by because he played what if he didnt play the result went the other way and then he was cleared this week? A team like Christies needs all the wins it can get to make the 8.
Also, a similar incident happened in a Lonsdale Morphett Vale game last year with the Pres of the Lions making the complaint! I think the Emus B's coach wasn't even called before the tribunal until finals time even thought the incident happened mid-season? The only officials that should be able to have any say from the sidelines in these matters are SFL officials club officials should have no say in filing reports! What happens on the field stays on the field! And thats my two cents! [/quote]

It was actually the Morphett Vale timekeeper who came forward and said that she would like to put a report in with the Lions as she thought that the act by the Morphett Vale B grade coach was disgusting. Should never be allowed to coach again in my opinion. No one should be able to deliberately knee an opposing player in the head when they are on the ground, especially if you're an official.[/quote]

I'm not defending the act I wasn't there but if it was such a blatant thing then the umpires would have seen it isn't it there job t report on these things? Also if they were disgusted with it what took so long to take action? If an offence is committed then it should be dealt with that week not 10 weeks later seems like the league needs to get off its ass and set some guidelines otherwise officials are gonna be reporting people left right and centre.[/quote]

I might head to a game this week and lodge a report ! any players to target????
Buff
Mini-League
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:45 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Buff » Fri May 25, 2007 3:19 pm

[quote="The Mexican"][quote="ORDoubleBlues"][quote="Dogwatcher"]I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are [i]Hangin' Tough[/i].[/quote]

While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.[/quote]

Seems we are all in agreeance the NKOTB has certainly "Got the Right Stuff.... Baby..."[/quote]

Hey gringo........any of ya hairy mexican bitches gettin their gear off at this gents evening????
Buff
Mini-League
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:45 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby new kid on the block » Fri May 25, 2007 3:20 pm

The Mexican wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are Hangin' Tough.


While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.


Seems we are all in agreeance the NKOTB has certainly "Got the Right Stuff.... Baby..."


what does that mean? "got the right stuff....baby..."?
footy*
new kid on the block
Mini-League
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: local sfl club
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Shirtfront » Fri May 25, 2007 3:22 pm

new kid on the block wrote:
The Mexican wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are Hangin' Tough.


While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.


Seems we are all in agreeance the NKOTB has certainly "Got the Right Stuff.... Baby..."


what does that mean? "got the right stuff....baby..."?


Don't tell me you don't know who you are named after??? I spose you don't know who Marky Mark's less famous brother is either?????
Shirtfront
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:17 pm
Location: Right up the middle
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Postby Waterboy » Fri May 25, 2007 4:28 pm

Zelezny Chucks wrote:
bass_player wrote:
Zelezny Chucks

Charlie wrote:
surely a reported player shouldn;t be allowed to play until the report has been delt with. The SFL should have delt with it on Tuesday /Wednesday after the game.


You can't just assume that he was guilty I agree it should have been dealt with after the weekend it happened but while Flaggies feel hard done by because he played what if he didnt play the result went the other way and then he was cleared this week? A team like Christies needs all the wins it can get to make the 8.
Also, a similar incident happened in a Lonsdale Morphett Vale game last year with the Pres of the Lions making the complaint! I think the Emus B's coach wasn't even called before the tribunal until finals time even thought the incident happened mid-season? The only officials that should be able to have any say from the sidelines in these matters are SFL officials club officials should have no say in filing reports! What happens on the field stays on the field! And thats my two cents!


It was actually the Morphett Vale timekeeper who came forward and said that she would like to put a report in with the Lions as she thought that the act by the Morphett Vale B grade coach was disgusting. Should never be allowed to coach again in my opinion. No one should be able to deliberately knee an opposing player in the head when they are on the ground, especially if you're an official.


I'm not defending the act I wasn't there but if it was such a blatant thing then the umpires would have seen it isn't it there job t report on these things? Also if they were disgusted with it what took so long to take action? If an offence is committed then it should be dealt with that week not 10 weeks later seems like the league needs to get off its ass and set some guidelines otherwise officials are gonna be reporting people left right and centre.


This one was also investigated my the police and the league said that they wouldn't hear the case themselves until the police investigation was finalised. Then there was a number of delays of the tribunal due to the Morphett Vale president being unavailable. Eventually the league said that the case had to heard before the final series and refused any more delays.
Waterboy
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:09 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: OSB Lonsdale

Postby new kid on the block » Fri May 25, 2007 4:35 pm

sharky wrote:
new kid on the block wrote:
The Mexican wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I agree NKOTB. I also reckon that some are Hangin' Tough.


While some are only taking it one 'step by step' at a time.


Seems we are all in agreeance the NKOTB has certainly "Got the Right Stuff.... Baby..."


what does that mean? "got the right stuff....baby..."?


Don't tell me you don't know who you are named after??? I spose you don't know who Marky Mark's less famous brother is either?????


yeh yeh! i got you now! good one, but no i wouldn't have a clue who his less famous bro is? i am hung like marky walberg in boogie nights?
footy*
new kid on the block
Mini-League
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: local sfl club
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 25, 2007 4:37 pm

I'm sure you're not NKOTB.

I just hope you'll be loving this site forever. :lol:
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby southee » Fri May 25, 2007 6:42 pm

Hackham player got 10 weeks this year!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  SFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |