by Mark_Beswick » Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:15 am
by JamesH » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:13 pm
by SANFLnut » Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:52 pm
by Ronnie » Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:20 pm
SANFLnut wrote:Surely that has already occurred with the introduction of the Crows and Power? SANFL league games post 1990 are very different on your cv than those in the 80s and earlier. There would be heaps of current league regulars that would not have got a sniff in the 80s. I'm not happy with having AFL teams in SANFL comp because they can't be trusted to try. Once their senior team is not going to play finals they will shut up shop very quickly. They have pulled 6,8,10 players out from SANFL clubs combined in a week before and no reason they won't do it in the last couple of rounds with their own team. Would certainly rather play Power reserves in rd 23 this year rather than round 1.
by SDK » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:17 pm
by teaoby » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:49 pm
by Ecky » Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:15 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by PhilH » Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:12 pm
by SDK » Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:38 pm
by FlyingHigh » Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:43 am
SANFLnut wrote:Surely that has already occurred with the introduction of the Crows and Power? SANFL league games post 1990 are very different on your cv than those in the 80s and earlier. There would be heaps of current league regulars that would not have got a sniff in the 80s.
I'm not happy with having AFL teams in SANFL comp because they can't be trusted to try. Once their senior team is not going to play finals they will shut up shop very quickly. They have pulled 6,8,10 players out from SANFL clubs combined in a week before and no reason they won't do it in the last couple of rounds with their own team. Would certainly rather play Power reserves in rd 23 this year rather than round 1.
by SANFLnut » Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:12 pm
by Groucho » Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:05 pm
by FOURTH ESTATE » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:31 am
by Hazydog » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:22 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:36 pm
Hazydog wrote:Speaking of compromised - and to highlight how the current set up compromises the League - Centrals had no AFL aligned players in either League or Reserves on Saturday night. Take Stewart & Johnston out of North's attack for starters and it looks a bit less imposing. Just another reason to remove all AFL aligned players from the SANFL all together.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by robranisgod » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:22 pm
Hazydog wrote:Speaking of compromised - and to highlight how the current set up compromises the League - Centrals had no AFL aligned players in either League or Reserves on Saturday night. Take Stewart & Johnston out of North's attack for starters and it looks a bit less imposing. Just another reason to remove all AFL aligned players from the SANFL all together.
by topsywaldron » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:31 pm
Hazydog wrote: Centrals had no AFL aligned players in either League or Reserves on Saturday night. Take Stewart & Johnston out of North's attack for starters and it looks a bit less imposing.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:33 pm
by am Bays » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:35 pm
Hazydog wrote:Speaking of compromised - and to highlight how the current set up compromises the League - Centrals had no AFL aligned players in either League or Reserves on Saturday night. Take Stewart & Johnston out of North's attack for starters and it looks a bit less imposing. Just another reason to remove all AFL aligned players from the SANFL all together.
by topsywaldron » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:39 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Another quality contribution.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |