by Squids » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:22 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:27 pm
by test » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:30 pm
Squids wrote:Tassie are the deserved winners, don't know what the problem is.
by Squids » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:30 pm
by dedja » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:32 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:33 pm
dedja wrote:Considering the way the Redbacks won their last Shield we've got nothing to complain about ...
by test » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:36 pm
Squids wrote:Its about winning the shield first and foremost. Tassie have done everything they can to do that.
If you were playing for Tassie would you want a close and exciting game or would you want to ensure you get the silverware?
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:06 pm
scoob wrote:The only time this year the Tassie pitch has been a road... need to take away the draw wins the shield clause. Home ground is advantage enough - if its a draw play an extra day. Shield finals are always a bore-fest!
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:22 pm
Jim05 wrote:scoob wrote:The only time this year the Tassie pitch has been a road... need to take away the draw wins the shield clause. Home ground is advantage enough - if its a draw play an extra day. Shield finals are always a bore-fest!
Cant have been too much of a road, Queensland struggled to make 200 and Tas were 5/15 in their second dig.
Great cricket by Tassie
by CENTURION » Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:00 pm
Squids wrote:Its about winning the shield first and foremost. Tassie have done everything they can to do that.
If you were playing for Tassie would you want a close and exciting game or would you want to ensure you get the silverware?
by scoob » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:03 pm
by heater31 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:06 pm
scoob wrote:What about the same rules as at the moment but a neutral curator to prepare the pitch.
If anyone thinks this is a typical Tas wicket they are kidding themselves. Qld would've been a massive chance on the usual Bellreve greentop
by RustyCage » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:17 pm
by RustyCage » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:19 pm
by scoob » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:45 pm
pafc1870 wrote:I think just leave it as it is. No point having this great comp then having an artificial final due to all these strange ideas of who can win and how
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:48 pm
scoob wrote:pafc1870 wrote:I think just leave it as it is. No point having this great comp then having an artificial final due to all these strange ideas of who can win and how
Precisely my point - this is artifical ie not the normal Tas pitch.
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:47 pm
CoverKing wrote:scoob wrote:pafc1870 wrote:I think just leave it as it is. No point having this great comp then having an artificial final due to all these strange ideas of who can win and how
Precisely my point - this is artifical ie not the normal Tas pitch.
Did you not see the pitch in the last shield game they played in? It is more about the intent of the batters and the good bowling. Bloody close to an outright result as we speak. If Harris held Silk on 1 in the first innings, the game could of been different.
Biggest over reaction about the pitch IMO. And even more so coming from the queensland camp considering it wasn't that long ago they made 6/900 in the shield final batting first
by scoob » Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:43 pm
by cheetah » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:18 am
by Rik E Boy » Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:35 am
scoob wrote:What about the same rules as at the moment but a neutral curator to prepare the pitch.
If anyone thinks this is a typical Tas wicket they are kidding themselves. Qld would've been a massive chance on the usual Bellreve greentop
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |