woodublieve12 wrote:TNA is a very average product with the exception of a few talents, saying that none would be main eventers I the wwe except for angle and hardy and possibly styles....They can barely sell arenas out. This aces ant 8's thing is becoming very boring, god sake the d'lo brown involved... Has sting got in the rafters yet???? It's a cheaper version of wcw.... Very average production
, but I'd rather watch the rock wrestle a chair then see anything jarrett us involved in. I've seen a fair bit of TNA and been to a live event but How can you take a company seriously when there main event guy is off his guts at a live televised event and makes the brand look very unprofessional. And TNA didn't even sack him...
Yeah because WWE stars have a really clean record...
Hardy was given one last chance, got his act together and was rewarded with a title run.
I don't particularly like his persona, but rate his in ring skills and crazy bumps he's taken over the years.
For a "very average product" TNA has gone from once a week PPV only, to being the top rating show on Spike, being apparently more popular than the WWE in the UK and having just had their largest crowd in the US (at Lockdown). Impact will be on the road from now on. WWE fanbois may not rate the TNA product (and a lot of people will say it was better before Bischoff and Hogan turned up), but in the end stronger competition might actually get you a better WWE. Personally, I'd rather watch fast and skilled wrestlers with generic characters than cartoonish big slow guys that often get pushed in the WWE.
Meanwhile the WWE have brought back Cameo Rock, the guy who gave the fans the finger at his previous Wrestlemania appearance, the supposedly retired HHH and the Undertaker on his last legs just to generate enough interest...
