Climate change...

Anything!

Do you believe Climate Change/Global Warming is a result of modern society

Strongly believe
21
24%
Believe
14
16%
50/50 , not yet sure
12
13%
dont believe
25
28%
Strongly dont believe
17
19%
 
Total votes : 89

Re: Climate change...

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:42 am

therisingblues wrote:
Psyber wrote:
What do you say then about the similar rise 270 million years ago?
What - or who - put the "sh!tloads of carbon dioxide we (are) putting into the atmosphere" there then?
I never get this argument: because something was natural in the past, mankind cannot be responsible for it now.
Anyway, a quick google revealed a couple of theories. The period you are asking about coincides with the Permian age, which ended about 250 million years ago. Wikipedia says it's the largest single extinction event on record. The strongest theory is that it was volcanic.
The following is copied and pasted from wiki:
The final stages of the Permian had two flood basalt events. A small one, Emeishan Traps in China, occurred at the same time as the end-Guadalupian extinction pulse, in an area close to the equator at the time.[96][97] The flood basalt eruptions that produced the Siberian Traps constituted one of the largest known volcanic events on Earth and covered over 2,000,000 square kilometres (770,000 sq mi) with lava.[98][99][100] The Siberian Traps eruptions were formerly thought to have lasted for millions of years, but recent research dates them to 251.2 ± 0.3 Ma — immediately before the end of the Permian.[9][101]

The Emeishan and Siberian Traps eruptions may have caused dust clouds and acid aerosols—which would have blocked out sunlight and thus disrupted photosynthesis both on land and in the photic zone of the ocean, causing food chains to collapse. These eruptions may also have caused acid rain when the aerosols washed out of the atmosphere. This may have killed land plants and molluscs and planktonic organisms which had calcium carbonate shells. The eruptions would also have emitted carbon dioxide, causing global warming. When all of the dust clouds and aerosols washed out of the atmosphere, the excess carbon dioxide would have remained and the warming would have proceeded without any mitigating effects.[93]

Your climate chart over the ages also indicates volcanic activity as the cause of the increased CO2 in that period.
Now these eruptions are believed to have been massive, unlike anything on Earth now. No doubt the occassional volcano goes pop from time to time now, but we haven't had a Krakatoa, Mt St Helens or Vesuvius for a while now, something else is driving CO2 levels up.

TRB, I don't say "mankind cannot be responsible for it now" - nor do I deny that mankind may be responsible for some of it now - I accept we are at least that!
My position is to oppose those who blindly pronounce it is all man made, given that there are substantial natural factors (apart from volcanoes) currently operating too.
(Like the current spike in the Milankovitch cycles due now.)

It worries me that attributing it all to man's activity may mean we think we can fix it all by changing our ways.
That may mean we don't plan for, and prepare to cope with, change that may go on regardless of anything we change in our own contribution.

(Just as we focus on CO2 while we ignore the many other pollutants we pump out that may be more immediately dangerous.)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Climate change...

Postby redwhiteandblueblooded » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:24 pm

this whole thread smacks of "my religion is better than yours". why does group A feel it needs to ram its point of view down group B's throat and visa versa?.
redwhiteandblueblooded
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Gawler South
Has liked: 107 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Gawler Central

Re: Climate change...

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:33 pm

You can't prove that religion is responsible.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby scoob » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:37 pm

Time for a lockdown... where are the mods when you need them!
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:52 pm

Red text is the mating call I think.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby RustyCage » Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:18 pm

scoob wrote:Time for a lockdown... where are the mods when you need them!


name a rule the thread or posts in it have broken?
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15303
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby redwhiteandblueblooded » Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:21 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:You can't prove that religion is responsible.


oh, I am sure I could come up with enough data, graphs and charts to completely twist anything anybody says to prove anything I may or may not have intended to prove. :shock:
redwhiteandblueblooded
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Gawler South
Has liked: 107 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Gawler Central

Re: Climate change...

Postby redwhiteandblueblooded » Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:27 pm

Did you know The Washington Monument in 6666 inches high and 666 inches around the base? :?:
redwhiteandblueblooded
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Gawler South
Has liked: 107 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Gawler Central

Re: Climate change...

Postby scoob » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:00 pm

pafc1870 wrote:
scoob wrote:Time for a lockdown... where are the mods when you need them!


name a rule the thread or posts in it have broken?


Nonsense posts! :lol:
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:44 pm

redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:Did you know The Washington Monument in 6666 inches high and 666 inches around the base? :?:

Hhmmm. The devil is at work.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby therisingblues » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:51 pm

Psyber wrote:
TRB, I don't say "mankind cannot be responsible for it now" - nor do I deny that mankind may be responsible for some of it now - I accept we are at least that!
My position is to oppose those who blindly pronounce it is all man made, given that there are substantial natural factors (apart from volcanoes) currently operating too.
(Like the current spike in the Milankovitch cycles due now.)

It worries me that attributing it all to man's activity may mean we think we can fix it all by changing our ways.
That may mean we don't plan for, and prepare to cope with, change that may go on regardless of anything we change in our own contribution.

(Just as we focus on CO2 while we ignore the many other pollutants we pump out that may be more immediately dangerous.)

Sorry Psyber, I sort of stated that in a general sense as I've read many opinions using that exact argument.
Although it is a mystery to me why you'd throw that line at Fish who has said many times that there are natural factors on top of man made ones.
Your Milankovitch Cycles got me interested so I went in search of this "current spike" you've been on about. What I uncovered thus far is that there are 3 major cycles: obliquity (axial tilt), eccentricity (shape of orbit) and precession (direction of tilt).
The current tilt is at 23.44 degrees, roughly half way between the extremes of 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. No spike there. The obliquity is decreasing which tends toward cooler summers and warmer winters and a cooler earth overall with less sunlight on the ice caps. The complete cycle lasts 41,000 years so there'll be no sudden changes.
The earth's orbit is currently 6.8 degrees out of whack. So it's not quite a perfect circle and means that when the Searth is closest to the sun is 6.8 degrees different to when it's furthest from the sun.
Currently January 3rd is when it's closest (Northern winter) and July 4th the furthest (Northern Summer). It's figured the Earth moves faster as it passes closer to the sun, hence the Northern winter is 4.66 days shorter than its summer. Vice versa the Southern summer. No spike here either.
The direction of tilt affects our weather in relation to eccentricity. If the tilt is such that the equinox occurs when the Earth is closest to the sun then both hemispheres will experience similar contrasts in seasons. A.T.M the Earth is closest to the sun during the southern summer, making it more extreme. So a possible explanation for higher temperatures exist here. But owing to the oval shaped orbit (eccentricity), the Earth actually spends more time further from the sun overall. Australia should be experiencing more extreme winters in accordance with this cycle and the Northern summer should be cooler.
I've been searching the net for a basic explanation of what it all means now, and found a few.
From Wiki:

An often-cited 1980 study by Imbrie and Imbrie determined that, "Ignoring anthropogenic and other possible sources of variation acting at frequencies higher than one cycle per 19,000 years, this model predicts that the long-term cooling trend that began some 6,000 years ago will continue for the next 23,000 years."[19]

More recent work by Berger and Loutre suggests that the current warm climate may last another 50,000 years.[20]



Berger and Loutre on current climate change:

Moreover we also confirm that the low amplitude of insolation change during MIS 11 as well as during the Holocene and the next tens of thousands of years makes the climate more sensitive to atmospheric CO2 concentration than at times of higher amplitude of the insolation change. Therefore human induced increase in greenhouse gas concentration for the future might affect climate even more drastically than in the past.
Citation: Berger, A., and M.-F. Loutre (2003), Climate 400,000 years ago, a key to the future?, in Earth's Climate and Orbital Eccentricity: The Marine Isotope Stage 11 Question, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 137, edited by A. W. Droxler, R. Z. Poore, and L. H. Burckle, pp. 17–26, AGU, Washington, D. C., doi:10.1029/137GM02
.
That was Berger/ Loutre who seem to be very well regarded in relation to Milankovitch cycles.
Link to this article:
http://www.agu.org/books/gm/v137/137GM02/137GM02.shtml

YouTube: a "one minute climate report".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlzQ1i2c ... ata_player

A basic explanation of cycles with graph and what it all means today:
http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/Thoc/M ... ycles.html
I'm interested in these cycles. Could you give me some websites that explain the spike you're talking about?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Climate change...

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:49 pm

TRB, you may have already found these that I have handy, but they summarise the situation and you can move on from them.
Milankovitch cycles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles
Other solar cycles: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/
Long term climate oscillation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_cycle
Then there is the modifying effect of orbital accretion: http://muller.lbl.gov/papers/lbl-35665.html

I offer the challenging data in response to fish now only when he occasionally steps away from the interface where we agree about both natural and human factors playing a part, and posts a link to someone else's work that does base itself only on short term data and subtly imply a solely human causation, without pointing out its limitations himself.

You might like to look at these below too, some useful and some not.
I can't supply the links in the time I have.
Climate Links.jpg
Climate Links.jpg (80.86 KiB) Viewed 378 times
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Climate change...

Postby Psyber » Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:35 pm

TRB, additional factors whose significance needs to be assessed.

While looking up something else entirely I came across these references some of which have components related to climate change:
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/SC24/index.html
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/
http://www.erh.noaa.gov/box/effects.htm
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/primer/Primer3.htm

The last one includes this section:
Climate:
The Sun is the heat engine that drives the circulation of our atmosphere. Although it has long been assumed to be a constant source of energy, recent measurements of this solar constant have shown that the base output of the Sun can have temporary decreases of up to one-half percent. Atmospheric scientists say that this variation is significant and that it can modify climate over time.

Plant growth has been shown to vary over the 11-year sunspot and 22-year magnetic cycles of the Sun, as evidenced in tree-ring records.

While the solar cycle has been nearly regular during the last 300 years, there was a period of 70 years during the 17th and 18th centuries when very few sunspots were seen. This drop in sunspot number coincided with the timing of the Little Ice Age in Europe, implying a Sun-climate connection.

Recently, a more direct link between climate and solar variability has been speculated. Stratospheric winds near the equator blow in different directions, depending on the time in the solar cycle. Studies are under way to determine how this wind reversal affects global circulation patterns and weather.

During proton events, many more energetic particles reach the Earth’s middle atmosphere. There they cause molecular ionization, creating chemicals that destroy atmospheric ozone and allow increased amounts of harmful solar ultraviolet radiation to reach the surface of the Earth. A solar proton event in 1982 resulted in a temporary 70% decrease in ozone densities.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Climate change...

Postby fish » Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:17 pm

More Demand on Emergency Services from Wilder Weather

The peak body for emergency services today stated that emergency services would need to need to prepare for a more extreme climate

The Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC) has released a statement supporting the Climate Commission’s “Extreme Weather” report, that warned that emergency services would need to prepare for a more extreme climate.

The statement acknowledges the scientific assessment that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather.
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby Psyber » Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:32 am

fish wrote:More Demand on Emergency Services from Wilder Weather

The peak body for emergency services today stated that emergency services would need to need to prepare for a more extreme climate

The Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC) has released a statement supporting the Climate Commission’s “Extreme Weather” report, that warned that emergency services would need to prepare for a more extreme climate.

The statement acknowledges the scientific assessment that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather.
Now there is a basic factual statement with which I have no disagreement.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Climate change...

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:43 pm

Didn't even get a sniff of a cyclone this wet. Very disappointing.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby scoob » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:50 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Didn't even get a sniff of a cyclone this wet. Very disappointing.


That's climate change
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby Booney » Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:25 pm

pafc1870 wrote:
scoob wrote:Time for a lockdown... where are the mods when you need them!


name a rule the thread or posts in it have broken?


Reaching too high on the intellect ladder?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61562
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8181 times
Been liked: 11910 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:01 pm

Booney wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:
scoob wrote:Time for a lockdown... where are the mods when you need them!


name a rule the thread or posts in it have broken?


Reaching too high on the intellect ladder?


Bit like Scientology, the rules are made up as you go along.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Climate change...

Postby Punk Rooster » Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:20 am

I tried to read trb's post, but started nodding off...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |