by Trader » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:42 pm
by heater31 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:47 pm
by Trader » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:01 pm
by no_remorse28 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:46 pm
Trader wrote:Taking a closer look at the "A-grade" side they have selected, it's not as bad as you would think.
9 of the 11 have played A1 before.
The other 2 guys, 1 took 4 for 30 odd last week and the other hit a ton earlier this year, both in A4.
Any A-grade that includes Sam Tyler and Ben Hook can't be all that bad.
If their A-grade is guaranteed finals, and their B-grade must win to get in, I can see why they could be tempted so slide a bit of help down to the B's, and in the process give their fringe A-graders an opportunity to experience A1 cricket.
It's not as bad as the clubs who enter their A-grade down in the B3 comp then carry on like idiots when they win a cheap flag.
Anyway, I'm sure they're not the only club to do it this week, at least they aren't trying to hide it! haha.
by Trader » Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:30 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:Trader wrote:It's not as bad as the clubs who enter their A-grade down in the B3 comp then carry on like idiots when they win a cheap flag.
I do hope that's not a dig at us, considering the only player we added to a side that lost the C2 GF last year played B3 the whole of last season, hardly playing super low considering, we also were put there, after applying to go much higher
by no_remorse28 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:05 pm
by Trader » Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:10 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:No as you said we were withdrawn from there last year and have since rebuilt with a young group of players, not many left from our a2 days
by no_remorse28 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:00 pm
Trader wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:No as you said we were withdrawn from there last year and have since rebuilt with a young group of players, not many left from our a2 days
Certainly a young group thats for sure.
I played a game against your LO's last year, I recon the oldest one was The Big Shrek.
by OKC! » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:42 pm
by bothamsfearnley » Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:19 pm
by no_remorse28 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:02 pm
by bothamsfearnley » Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:07 pm
by Burgermeister » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:49 pm
bothamsfearnley wrote:Thanks for that.
In B3
Concordia 49 vs Brahma Lodge 4/232
In A2
Concordia 124 vs Brahma 5/103
by rod_rooster » Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:05 pm
by Executive Member » Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:14 pm
Burgermeister wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Thanks for that.
In B3
Concordia 49 vs Brahma Lodge 4/232
In A2
Concordia 124 vs Brahma 5/103
Any reason why a bloke who took six in the As last round gets dropped to the Bs to take seven and clean up Concordia for 49?
by no_remorse28 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:16 pm
by Trader » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:51 pm
rod_rooster wrote:After all the commotion on here, how did PAOC line up yesterday?
by Trader » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:53 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:Although Nelson won't need one looks like quite a few permits sought In B3 finals, how lenient is the association towards these , not much experience with them
by Trader » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:54 pm
Burgermeister wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Thanks for that.
In B3
Concordia 49 vs Brahma Lodge 4/232
In A2
Concordia 124 vs Brahma 5/103
Any reason why a bloke who took six in the As last round gets dropped to the Bs to take seven and clean up Concordia for 49?
by no_remorse28 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:56 pm
Trader wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:Although Nelson won't need one looks like quite a few permits sought In B3 finals, how lenient is the association towards these , not much experience with them
My understanding is the turf are keen to take a black and white view on permits this year.
If you qualify, you're in, if you don't, you'd need a damn good reason as to why you should be given one.
Got any examples of players you think will need a permit?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |