by Bluedemon » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:26 am
by Dutchy » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:08 am
by Aerie » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:24 am
by topsywaldron » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:43 pm
Aerie wrote:It stinks that a player one level up is on the salary of two whole SANFL teams.
by am Bays » Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:49 pm
Aerie wrote:It stinks that a player one level up is on the salary of two whole SANFL teams.
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:58 pm
Aerie wrote:Does the SANFL care about the SANFL?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Pseudo » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:43 pm
by JK » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:57 pm
Pseudo wrote:There is no reason why the AFL should care about the SANFL and other leagues, per se.
by dedja » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:25 pm
by JK » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:28 pm
by dedja » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:29 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:32 pm
by dedja » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:37 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:41 pm
dedja wrote:Can I dare to suggest something to Matt Benson?
Mate, I feel for you and your club and hope it turns out OK but playing out your issues in the media isn't going to get you anywhere.
Talk, hassle and negotiate your arse off but do it behind closed doors.
by Macca19 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:09 pm
JK wrote:Pseudo wrote:There is no reason why the AFL should care about the SANFL and other leagues, per se.
Depends how much they value the development the SANFL clubs provide to their future AFL players.
I think this bit "the AFL, which spent $1.4 million on game development in SA in 2012 compared to about $20 million in NSW" shows the AFL can and does, take traditional football states and their premier competition for granted.
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:27 pm
Macca19 wrote:JK wrote:Pseudo wrote:There is no reason why the AFL should care about the SANFL and other leagues, per se.
Depends how much they value the development the SANFL clubs provide to their future AFL players.
I think this bit "the AFL, which spent $1.4 million on game development in SA in 2012 compared to about $20 million in NSW" shows the AFL can and does, take traditional football states and their premier competition for granted.
The AFL have said they would substantially improve the dollars they spend on development in SA so long as the SANFL dropped their salary cap in line with other state leagues. The SANFL, as is their right, has refused to do so. The SANFL could easily drop the salary cap - a salary cap that clubs can barely afford - and spend that saving on development, as opposed to relying on AFL funds.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by JK » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:29 pm
Macca19 wrote:JK wrote:Pseudo wrote:There is no reason why the AFL should care about the SANFL and other leagues, per se.
Depends how much they value the development the SANFL clubs provide to their future AFL players.
I think this bit "the AFL, which spent $1.4 million on game development in SA in 2012 compared to about $20 million in NSW" shows the AFL can and does, take traditional football states and their premier competition for granted.
The AFL have said they would substantially improve the dollars they spend on development in SA so long as the SANFL dropped their salary cap in line with other state leagues. The SANFL, as is their right, has refused to do so. The SANFL could easily drop the salary cap - a salary cap that clubs can barely afford - and spend that saving on development, as opposed to relying on AFL funds.
by Macca19 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:15 pm
JK wrote:Macca19 wrote:JK wrote:Pseudo wrote:There is no reason why the AFL should care about the SANFL and other leagues, per se.
Depends how much they value the development the SANFL clubs provide to their future AFL players.
I think this bit "the AFL, which spent $1.4 million on game development in SA in 2012 compared to about $20 million in NSW" shows the AFL can and does, take traditional football states and their premier competition for granted.
The AFL have said they would substantially improve the dollars they spend on development in SA so long as the SANFL dropped their salary cap in line with other state leagues. The SANFL, as is their right, has refused to do so. The SANFL could easily drop the salary cap - a salary cap that clubs can barely afford - and spend that saving on development, as opposed to relying on AFL funds.
Yep, and the SANFL is trying to maintain a stance of being the next best league in the country .. Which (IMHO) it was for a while, not sure these days.
However, if we drastically reduce the cap as the AFL wants, let's say halve it to $180k or thereabouts, what hope does the competition have of attracting anyone, or even retaining anyone when they can all earn shedloads more in Ammos?
No disrespect intended Macca, but Im not surprised a one club fan has pointed that out.
by Macca19 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:28 pm
UK Fan wrote:
So your advocating the afl holding sanfl clubs to ransom ????? And trying to apportion the blame on our overspending Macca.??
by JK » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:36 pm
Macca19 wrote:Benson keeps going on about how the SANFL is a great resource for the AFL in terms of junior development, well how put we sink more money into that and raise the bar in terms of draftees coming out of this state.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |