by areaman » Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:29 am
by doggies4eva » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:40 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:33 pm
by dedja » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:36 pm
by Barto » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:46 pm
csbowes wrote:What is probably MOST concerning is that the club had $219K in debt demolition donations included in the revenue.
by Dutchy » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:48 pm
Barto wrote:csbowes wrote:What is probably MOST concerning is that the club had $219K in debt demolition donations included in the revenue.
I was hoping that I'd misinterpreted this when it was mentioned elsewhere. I cant see that the club has a future beyond 2014 if that's the case.
by Dutchy » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:50 pm
Big Phil wrote:From Localfootysa...
Matt Benson suggesting the AFL should support SANFL clubs more...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6580140255
by Ronnie » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:52 pm
by dedja » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:53 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:59 pm
dedja wrote:Did the SANFL guarantee North, Glenelg, Norwood or anyone else when they got into financial trouble? ... just asking
by Barto » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:05 pm
csbowes wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:So some at Sturt think the only solution is to throw in the towel and become the crows reserve side, but also drag the rest of the competition down to sturts standard by nearly halving the salary cap.
I disagree with the sentiment you're implying, that people want to throw in the towel...
... however, your supposition that it would drag the competition down etc remains true. I don't think having reserves side would necessarily be good for the competition, but I also think it might happen regardless.
Many fans (of not just Sturt) would side with the idea of keeping the clubs identity as a reserves side to an AFL team as opposed to just disolving completely and never competing again.
Of course, many would prefer to die with dignity (as they would see it).
I'm really torn on it. But as I've said above, I support investigating it. I'd like some facts from which to base my decision on...
by CENTURION » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:08 pm
by Barto » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:16 pm
CENTURION wrote:Why can't a club that's struggling reduce the admittance charge, in an attempt to get more people to the game? Gotta try something!
by SDK » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:30 pm
by Dog_ger » Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:01 pm
by JK » Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:27 pm
CENTURION wrote:Why can't a club that's struggling reduce the admittance charge, in an attempt to get more people to the game? Gotta try something!
by Macca19 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:33 pm
CENTURION wrote:dedja wrote:Did the SANFL guarantee North, Glenelg, Norwood or anyone else when they got into financial trouble? ... just asking
you forgot Port.
by robranisgod » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:10 pm
dedja wrote:Did the SANFL guarantee North, Glenelg, Norwood or anyone else when they got into financial trouble? ... just asking
by RustyCage » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:13 pm
by csbowes » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:39 pm
areaman wrote:Is there a link available to the Sturt financial report for 2012?
Had a brief look on the official website but couldn't find anything.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |