by bloods08 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:34 pm
by the joker » Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:49 pm
by footys the winner » Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:51 pm
Aerie wrote:How many bowlers do they need? If Clarke is batting at 5 they need Wade at 7 or he'll run out of partners pretty quickly.
Khawaja might be a better option at number 6? Wade at 7. Warner and Clarke can bowl spin. If Watson can bowl, bowl him too. He's not that good a batsman that they need to worry about if he breaks down.
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Watson
Clarke
Khawaja
Wade
Starc
Johnson
Lyon
Bird
by whufc » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:36 pm
footys the winner wrote:Aerie wrote:How many bowlers do they need? If Clarke is batting at 5 they need Wade at 7 or he'll run out of partners pretty quickly.
Khawaja might be a better option at number 6? Wade at 7. Warner and Clarke can bowl spin. If Watson can bowl, bowl him too. He's not that good a batsman that they need to worry about if he breaks down.
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Watson
Clarke
Khawaja
Wade
Starc
Johnson
Lyon
Bird
Yep. That looks a well balanced team.
by Jim05 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:58 pm
by Aerie » Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:58 pm
whufc wrote:footys the winner wrote:Aerie wrote:How many bowlers do they need? If Clarke is batting at 5 they need Wade at 7 or he'll run out of partners pretty quickly.
Khawaja might be a better option at number 6? Wade at 7. Warner and Clarke can bowl spin. If Watson can bowl, bowl him too. He's not that good a batsman that they need to worry about if he breaks down.
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Watson
Clarke
Khawaja
Wade
Starc
Johnson
Lyon
Bird
Yep. That looks a well balanced team.
Nope a well balanced side in India requires two specialist spinners
by whufc » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:04 pm
by Aerie » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:28 pm
whufc wrote:Pace bowling is not a strength when the ball doesn't get up past your knees.
England would say pace is there strength apart from Swann but they were smart enough two play to spinners and then smashed the indians
McGrath, lee, Gillespie were pretty handy yet struggled big time on indian decks
A good analogy I heard today was like a footy team that's strength is their big 3 tall forwards, you play a game in the wettest conditions imaginable, while the talls forwards maybe your strength you more than likely are going to have sacrifice one and play another crumbling/small forward
by whufc » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:34 pm
Aerie wrote:whufc wrote:Pace bowling is not a strength when the ball doesn't get up past your knees.
England would say pace is there strength apart from Swann but they were smart enough two play to spinners and then smashed the indians
McGrath, lee, Gillespie were pretty handy yet struggled big time on indian decks
A good analogy I heard today was like a footy team that's strength is their big 3 tall forwards, you play a game in the wettest conditions imaginable, while the talls forwards maybe your strength you more than likely are going to have sacrifice one and play another crumbling/small forward
McGrath and Gillespie averaged 21 in India. Hasn't been a happy hunting ground for many others.
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:48 pm
by Media Park » Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:17 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by the joker » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:02 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:05 pm
by whufc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:06 pm
the joker wrote:Point 3 is a load of carp
by Media Park » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:46 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Squids » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:22 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:47 pm
by Brodlach » Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:20 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:00 pm
by whufc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:07 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Doherty 3 wickets.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |