by teaoby » Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:23 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:33 pm
klaan wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/norwood-captain-kieran-mcguinness-investigated-over-payment-anomaly/story-e6freckc-1226572919488
Nothing to worry about.
by Robe Dog » Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:48 pm
by The Apostle » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:00 pm
by nwdfanparade » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:02 pm
CENTURION wrote:I am of the understanding that Norwood have erred fairly seriously & the powers that be know they have.....but so far, up until now, they haven't been able to prove it. up until now. ENTER THE TAXMAN.
by dedja » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:08 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:20 pm
by dedja » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:22 pm
by klaan » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:48 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:57 pm
by The Apostle » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:28 pm
by wild dog » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:28 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:CENTURION wrote:I am of the understanding that Norwood have erred fairly seriously & the powers that be know they have.....but so far, up until now, they haven't been able to prove it. up until now. ENTER THE TAXMAN.
So Kmac was given some work to do by the club (while injured and therefore not paid match payments in relation to the salary cap).
Will the tax man investigate the extra carpentry work that the Gowan twins did either for the CD club or as recommended by the CD club to the public? Did the Gowans get the legislated trade rates when doing this extra work?
Sweep your own front door step before you complain about your neighbours (Swedish proverb)
by Long live SAnFL » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:28 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:38 pm
dedja wrote:That's why the Bays are the only club that have never been caught ...
by SimonH » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:51 pm
by Bunton » Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:36 am
by JK » Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:18 am
Bunton wrote:more to it than what the article suggests - if it was just a transparent contract amendment, it would have been dealt with long ago, ala West and Port. This is a much more sly, yep sloppy in the end, arrangement. They have only been caught re-handed fort the McGuinness contract to date, but real interest will come if Investigations Committee insist on access to other player banks accounts and insist on them signing stat decs about payments recieved. stay tuned
by JK » Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:23 am
The Apostle wrote:And I wouldn't believe a word of what the Norwood chief bullshit artist said either!
by StrayDog » Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:45 am
Long live SAnFL wrote:Have read these posts with interest noting most of the jealous rage comes from the johnny come latelys who call the umpire ref![]()
Those that throw stones live in houses with broken windows
by CENTURION » Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:07 am
nwdfanparade wrote:CENTURION wrote:I am of the understanding that Norwood have erred fairly seriously & the powers that be know they have.....but so far, up until now, they haven't been able to prove it. up until now. ENTER THE TAXMAN.
So Kmac was given some work to do by the club (while injured and therefore not paid match payments in relation to the salary cap).
Will the tax man investigate the extra carpentry work that the Gowan twins did either for the CD club or as recommended by the CD club to the public? Did the Gowans get the legislated trade rates when doing this extra work?
Sweep your own front door step before you complain about your neighbours (Swedish proverb)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |