Salary Cap Issues - Norwood, West & Port

[whufc]

How are they supposed to be over??

No detail given just said they are now under investigation!

[UK Fan]

This has to be longest investigation into a salary cap breach in SANFL history.

[CENTURION]

How are they supposed to be over??

they spent more than they were allowed to.

[JK]

How are they supposed to be over??

Won't be over, the SANFL might think we've operated outside of the guidelines I would suggest

[Dogwatcher]

What does that mean?

[CENTURION]

that means Norwood are right and the SANFL & their investigative branch are wrong.

[DOC]

How are they supposed to be over??

Won't be over, the SANFL might think we've operated outside of the guidelines I would suggest

Is it in relation to sign on payments/bonuses?

[JK]

What does that mean?

LOL I think you know what it means, but just in case ...

Means (for example) a club could miss declaring an expense that should be included in the Cap, and even if that expense keeps you under the cap, it's still deemed a breach for not having abided by the rules and list it as a contribution under the cap.

[whufc]

What does that mean?

Considering nearly every Norwood fan denied this was an issue I don't think they anything about what's going on, I would suggest

These rumours have just never died off! Hopefully it will be sorted either way very soon

[CENTURION]

and why would the supporters know?

[JK]

and why would the supporters know?

Exactly, although it would seem a lot of supporters know about these things via West Lakes rather than the clubs themselves

[whufc]

and why would the supporters know?

Exactly, although it would seem a lot of supporters know about these things via West Lakes rather than the clubs themselves

Agree, there are obviously leaks out there, or people who get very lucky when they make up rumours. A guy on the CDFC forum posted this exact outcome when the rumours first surfaced.

[fester69]

JK is right, undeclared expense which is a salary cap breach but still not over in $$$ terms.

[whufc]

JK is right, undeclared expense which is a salary cap breach but still not over in $$$ terms.

So Norwood broke the rules, is that another word for cheating I wonder if they will publicly apologise to triple m if found guilty!

Scrap the cap imho!!

[Dogwatcher]

It was an investment well made most Norwood people would suggest as they thumb their noses at the rest of us. Fair enough, too.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Shouldn't we wait and see what they have or haven't done before "congratulating" them?

[whufc]

Shouldn't we wait and see what they have or haven't done before "congratulating" them?

Hopefully all these cap dramas are enough for the SANFL to consider scrapping it.

Also it seems to be only the Norwood supporters who are conceding they have broken the rules after this news!

[am Bays]

JK is right, undeclared expense which is a salary cap breach but still not over in $$$ terms.

So baiscally they did what Adelaide did, undeclared payments but still under...

So Baynesy is suspeneded for six months, and they can't go in the mini-draft next year....

[Spargo]

And if found guilty of any breaches after winning a flag and say fined, oh, I don't know, maybe a paltry $5k, maybe a president might be heard to chuckle "best 5 grand we've ever spent".

[fester69]

JK is right, undeclared expense which is a salary cap breach but still not over in $$$ terms.

So baiscally they did what Adelaide did, undeclared payments but still under...

So Baynesy is suspeneded for six months, and they can't go in the mini-draft next year....

No, because Norwood never tampered with the AFL draft. We did what Sydney did, won the Premiership!