If you have a talented kid who wants to play AFL leave SA.

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby doggies4eva » Wed May 16, 2007 10:49 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
doggies4eva wrote: What did I miss?


You missed the point that you are "debating" the great all knowing purveyor of football develpoment knowledge that is the great Mark Ducker/Trev Hill...

Do what I did start typing a response (based along you line of argument) and then thought F*ck it, he has demonstrated no idea of the development challenges facing kids from outside WA, SA & VIC that all I'm doing is wasting kilobytes of webspace...


Oh! He's the Trev Hill from the other site? Explains it all #-o
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Jar Man Out » Wed May 16, 2007 11:41 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
mark ducker wrote:Really doggies4eva, i thought it did. :roll:

Seeing as your such a good reader can you show me where someone claims the whole system is stuffed ???? Try and keep up.


Oh, did I miss something? I thought that the issue was that kids from NSW and Queensland can get scholarships to play in Victoria and SA WA and Vicorian kids can't. The point that I has tried to make was that SA, WA and Vic have greater overall opportunities for a young player to advance through the ranks so we are not really disadvantaged by this. What did I miss?


Just as i thought nobody stated the whole thing is stuffed.

Explain to me why the Australian Football league will not allow kids from all over australia to have an AFL scholarship. If a 16 year old from sa is as equally a gifted footballer as one from nsw. how can one be granted access to an afl list but the other has to wait 18 months purely based on how developed their footballing state is.

it is blatant discrimination. As stated earlier. be alot easier to make the NSW state team and easier to shine in it in comparison to SA state side. Also at the national championships you only play against QLD TAS and NT. While SA boys have to play in the hard division with both Vic teams and WA. I cant agree it is easier here.

Also as the riddler pointed out more qld juniors got drafted than ours last year.

anyone hearing alarm bells yet ???
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Pag » Thu May 17, 2007 1:03 am

The kids who receive scholarships in NSW and QLD are not guaranteed a spot on an AFL list. It's not like it's being handed to them, they still have three years of work to do before getting some sort of chance. They're just being given the help that they don't get playing in the top NSW league or the QAFL. Kids in SA have an excellent structure, being able to play against men before being drafted, they're at no disadvantage whatsoever.

I'm sure the AFL recruiters look at the SANFL, WAFL and TAC Cup first, as they are the premier competitions for Under 18 kids in the country, and I'm sure their draft selections take this into account. The kids from NSW and QLD are simply given some help that kids in SA, WA and Victoria have always had.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Postby twosheds » Thu May 17, 2007 7:53 am

By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile. It doesnt matter what state they are in if they are good enough and motivated they will make it. Moving state reeks of being "stage parents" trying to live their sporting careers vicariously through their son.
User avatar
twosheds
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Back in Adelaide
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 18 times

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 17, 2007 8:56 am

twosheds wrote:By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile. It doesnt matter what state they are in if they are good enough and motivated they will make it. Moving state reeks of being "stage parents" trying to live their sporting careers vicariously through their son.


There are some big words in there Two Sheds. This is a Footy forum :!: :shock:
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby MagareyLegend » Thu May 17, 2007 9:22 am

Bottom line - if you are good enough you will make it no matter where you live. If you have interfering parents you won't no matter how good you are.
MagareyLegend
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:12 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Jar Man Out » Thu May 17, 2007 9:38 am

Pag wrote:The kids who receive scholarships in NSW and QLD are not guaranteed a spot on an AFL list. It's not like it's being handed to them, they still have three years of work to do before getting some sort of chance. They're just being given the help that they don't get playing in the top NSW league or the QAFL. Kids in SA have an excellent structure, being able to play against men before being drafted, they're at no disadvantage whatsoever.

I'm sure the AFL recruiters look at the SANFL, WAFL and TAC Cup first, as they are the premier competitions for Under 18 kids in the country, and I'm sure their draft selections take this into account. The kids from NSW and QLD are simply given some help that kids in SA, WA and Victoria have always had.


Yet again what are you basing these assumptions on ???

If AFL recruiters look towards the SANFL first. Why did Hayden Skipworth who was potentially going to be drafted leave the best comp outside the afl. ??? to get more exposure.

For the 4th time now.More Queenslanders got drafted than SA kids last year. So dont assume SA kids gets heaps of exposure.

Tom Hurley all australian sa junior completely ignored at the natonal draft. Has a NSW or QLD all australian ever not been picked up ????

The kids from NSW and QLD are not being given what vic, wa and sa kids have always had . what a crock. vic sa and wa kids can not get a scholarship. infact like with bryce gibbs last year if they even speak to a club they can be fined or banned from going to that club.

If a 16 year old kid here has just as much talent as one in QLD or NSW. WHy cant he get access to an afl list.

answer cos the state he lives in has played aussie rules for 100 of years. Im sorry that is unacceptable.
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu May 17, 2007 10:56 am

You're very passionate about this MD, do you have a youngster with talent you are concerned about? Or is it just SA footy in general?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby Pseudo » Thu May 17, 2007 11:33 am

Ecky wrote:I can see the similarities between this and "coloured" cricketers in South Africa being given preferential treatment (although it is easier to move states than to change the colour of your skin :) )


Difficult but not impossible. Case in point:

Image

:lol:
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12248
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Postby Pag » Thu May 17, 2007 1:33 pm

mark ducker wrote:
Pag wrote:The kids who receive scholarships in NSW and QLD are not guaranteed a spot on an AFL list. It's not like it's being handed to them, they still have three years of work to do before getting some sort of chance. They're just being given the help that they don't get playing in the top NSW league or the QAFL. Kids in SA have an excellent structure, being able to play against men before being drafted, they're at no disadvantage whatsoever.

I'm sure the AFL recruiters look at the SANFL, WAFL and TAC Cup first, as they are the premier competitions for Under 18 kids in the country, and I'm sure their draft selections take this into account. The kids from NSW and QLD are simply given some help that kids in SA, WA and Victoria have always had.


Yet again what are you basing these assumptions on ???

If AFL recruiters look towards the SANFL first. Why did Hayden Skipworth who was potentially going to be drafted leave the best comp outside the afl. ??? to get more exposure.

For the 4th time now.More Queenslanders got drafted than SA kids last year. So dont assume SA kids gets heaps of exposure.

Tom Hurley all australian sa junior completely ignored at the natonal draft. Has a NSW or QLD all australian ever not been picked up ????

The kids from NSW and QLD are not being given what vic, wa and sa kids have always had . what a crock. vic sa and wa kids can not get a scholarship. infact like with bryce gibbs last year if they even speak to a club they can be fined or banned from going to that club.

If a 16 year old kid here has just as much talent as one in QLD or NSW. WHy cant he get access to an afl list.

answer cos the state he lives in has played aussie rules for 100 of years. Im sorry that is unacceptable.

Mate Hayden Skipworth is 22-23 years old and has missed his AFL chance, funny that he moved to Victoria to get noticed (another footballing state) and not NSW or QLD.

Hurley shouldn't have been ignored, but the fact he was from SA wasn't the reason. His height and supposed lack of pace was what cost him. Same as it would've if he had've lived in NSW or QLD.

The kids here have the chance to play in a league that has a standard miles above the NSW or QLD leagues, they're more ready for AFL football when they get drafted than what kids from NSW or QLD are.
Last edited by Pag on Fri May 18, 2007 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Postby twosheds » Thu May 17, 2007 2:20 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
twosheds wrote:By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile. It doesnt matter what state they are in if they are good enough and motivated they will make it. Moving state reeks of being "stage parents" trying to live their sporting careers vicariously through their son.


There are some big words in there Two Sheds. This is a Footy forum :!: :shock:


No it isn't!
User avatar
twosheds
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Back in Adelaide
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 18 times

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 17, 2007 2:50 pm

twosheds wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
twosheds wrote:By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile. It doesnt matter what state they are in if they are good enough and motivated they will make it. Moving state reeks of being "stage parents" trying to live their sporting careers vicariously through their son.


There are some big words in there Two Sheds. This is a Footy forum :!: :shock:


No it isn't!


Yes it is!
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Jar Man Out » Thu May 17, 2007 7:00 pm

PAG "Mate Hayden Skipworth is 22-23 years old and has missed his AFL chance, funny that he moved to Victoria to get noticed (another footballing state) and not NSW or QLD."

Hurley shouldn't have been ignored, but the fact he was from SA wasn't the reason. His height and supposed lack of pace was what cost him. Same as it would've if he had've lived in NSW or QLD.

The kids here have the chance to play in a league that has a standard miles above the NWS or QLD leagues, they're more ready for AFL football when they get drafted than what kids fro NSW or QLD are.

"Pag you are simply incorrect. Skipworth can be drafted , Matthew Clarke got drafted at 33. Keep up. Essendon wanted skipworth but only if he played for bendigo in the vfl. kind of contradicts your "im sure afl selectors look at sanfl , wafl and tac cup first. WRONG Essendon dont".

Unfortunately it makes no difference if our kids are more developed anymore. cos kids from NSW and Qld do not need to be drafted anymore. 32 school kids get free entry onto afl lists bypassing the draft. While our more developed footballers dont. How Is that fair. also dont forget more qld than sa kids drafted last year. not bad considering our kids are way more developed . not adding up is it pag.

Can also point out none of what you guys have said has still justified this blatant discrimination to our junior talent at all. Just because NSW and QLD football arent as set up than SA should not equate to their juniors get a free ride into the AFL while ours get lumped in with the rest. Give them a scholarship if they need it. But free access to afl list can not be allowed.

I am not asking for special treatment to our kids just a level playing field. At the end of the day should we really have to ask.

let me give you a scenario.

bryce gibbs at 15 has some talent. crows give him a scholarship and in two years can place him on their senior list . not loose a clearly talented junior to the pool and hope for the best.

but obviously the SANFl has got it set up perfectly.
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Pag » Fri May 18, 2007 10:21 am

mark ducker wrote:PAG "Mate Hayden Skipworth is 22-23 years old and has missed his AFL chance, funny that he moved to Victoria to get noticed (another footballing state) and not NSW or QLD."

Hurley shouldn't have been ignored, but the fact he was from SA wasn't the reason. His height and supposed lack of pace was what cost him. Same as it would've if he had've lived in NSW or QLD.

The kids here have the chance to play in a league that has a standard miles above the NWS or QLD leagues, they're more ready for AFL football when they get drafted than what kids fro NSW or QLD are.

"Pag you are simply incorrect. Skipworth can be drafted , Matthew Clarke got drafted at 33. Keep up. Essendon wanted skipworth but only if he played for bendigo in the vfl. kind of contradicts your "im sure afl selectors look at sanfl , wafl and tac cup first. WRONG Essendon dont".

Unfortunately it makes no difference if our kids are more developed anymore. cos kids from NSW and Qld do not need to be drafted anymore. 32 school kids get free entry onto afl lists bypassing the draft. While our more developed footballers dont. How Is that fair. also dont forget more qld than sa kids drafted last year. not bad considering our kids are way more developed . not adding up is it pag.

Can also point out none of what you guys have said has still justified this blatant discrimination to our junior talent at all. Just because NSW and QLD football arent as set up than SA should not equate to their juniors get a free ride into the AFL while ours get lumped in with the rest. Give them a scholarship if they need it. But free access to afl list can not be allowed.

I am not asking for special treatment to our kids just a level playing field. At the end of the day should we really have to ask.

let me give you a scenario.

bryce gibbs at 15 has some talent. crows give him a scholarship and in two years can place him on their senior list . not loose a clearly talented junior to the pool and hope for the best.

but obviously the SANFl has got it set up perfectly.

I didn't say Skipworth couldn't be drafted, I just said he has missed his chance. When you're 22-23 and been a fringe AFL player on a list for 4-5 years then get de-listed, your chances of getting picked up aren't that great because clubs usually look at 18 year old-kids in the draft (Rodan is an exception, Clarke is in a whole different category).

I still think the AFL clubs would have to look at the SANFL, WAFL and TAC Cup first. Skipworth couldn't go to the TAC Cup as it's an Under 18 comp so if Sheedy really did want to see where he was at he had to go play in the VFL.

The QLD and NSW kids aren't getting a free ride onto the list. They're not being put on a senior AFL list at 15. They've still gotta be good enough at 18 or they won't get that chance.
Last edited by Pag on Fri May 18, 2007 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Postby am Bays » Fri May 18, 2007 11:07 am

Pag wrote:
The QLD and NSW kids aren't getting a free ride onto the list. They're not being put on a senior AFL list at 15. They've still gotta be good enough at 18 or they won't get that chance.


And that is the argument in a nut shell FFS they aren't even on a Rookie list merely "alligned" to an AFL club There to get exposed to the AFL environemt and opportunity to periodically train at a better level compared to the "training" they might normally do at the North Shore Bombers for argument sake!!! In much the same way JAmes Selalr trained at Adelaide last year as part of his AIS/AFL scholarship.

These scholarships come with no guarabntee to get drafted.

In no way are they guaranteed an AFL spot any more than a kid playing U/17s footy at Norwood. Trust me the Div 2 sides are envious of teh consistant high level competition teh SA, WA and VIC kids are exposed to - hence why in the NT we used to send some kids down to Adelaide to train and play U/19s with SANFL clubs.

For those of you that have been following the Div 2 U/16s and U/18 champinships sides closely over the past few years the crop of QLD U/18s that went though last year have been a cut above the NT, TAS and NSW/ACT over that period as U/16s and U/18s. There are a couple of guns earmaked about three years ago as certainties to be drafted.

They were drafted becasue of their efforts agaisnt TAC sides over the last two years and in the combined Div 2 vs TAC Cup side game that is held each year in GF week that gives the best of both comps (Div 2 teams and the best of the TAC cup kids not palying in teh GF) a final hit out in front of all the talent managers from each AFL club. They weren't drafted becasue of where they were lived they were drafted becasue oer the last three years those kids proved they could play....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19758
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2128 times

Postby doggies4eva » Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am

And the argument that more kids from Quennsland get drafted proves nothing. Queensland has a larger population and this may be a one-off. The trend over a number of years needs to be looked at as it may just be that Queensland had an abnormally strong group last year.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby SimonH » Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am

mark ducker wrote:Unfortunately it makes no difference if our kids are more developed anymore. cos kids from NSW and Qld do not need to be drafted anymore.
1. Queensland is not in the scholarship program. All kids from Qld have to be drafted. Trying to bring Qld (relatively strong comp, significant number of kids drafted, no scholarship scheme) with NSW (fairly weak comp, small number of kids drafted, scholarship scheme) just shows you've got it confused. In fact, those parts of NSW (Wagga/Riverina area) where Aussie rules is historically strong are not even eligible for scholarships.
2. Just in case you're not on top of the rules of this thing: the kids are entered onto a scholarship program from 14-17 yoa. In the draft where they reach draftable age, the scholarship club has first dibs on them. If they pass (and, you mark my words, many will) they go into the general draft the same as anyone else. So why, apart from being masochists trying to build a weak list, would they pick their NSW scholarship player over a 'more developed' SA kid?

mark ducker wrote:32 school kids get free entry onto afl lists bypassing the draft. While our more developed footballers dont. How Is that fair.
They don't get free entry onto AFL lists. See above. Your concern seems to be that your 'more developed' footballers won't go where you want, rather than not getting drafted. See below.

mark ducker wrote:also dont forget more qld than sa kids drafted last year. not bad considering our kids are way more developed . not adding up is it pag.
You're running yourself in circles here. The Qld kids were drafted on the open market, right? That level playing field that you say you want so badly? So what exactly is your problem with large numbers of Queensland boys, none of whom had anything to do with the scholarship scheme, being drafted?

mark ducker wrote:Can also point out none of what you guys have said has still justified this blatant discrimination to our junior talent at all. Just because NSW and QLD football arent as set up than SA should not equate to their juniors get a free ride into the AFL while ours get lumped in with the rest. Give them a scholarship if they need it. But free access to afl list can not be allowed.
You've finally acknowledged the reason behind the scholarship scheme. And the reason why the title of this thread is ridiculous. If your child wants to play Aussie rules professionally, you would accelerate their development by moving them to a non-Aussie rules state where the standard of competition, infrastructure and coaching are all inferior to your home state? Shyeah right.

It would make about as much sense for you, if your child is an Aussie rules prodigy, to move to South Africa... because the AFL is spending money there, you'll get access to special programs not available in Australia, and you can cheat your way onto a list by being listed as an international rookie. I can hear the rush of future Ross Gibbses buying their ticket to Capetown now.

mark ducker wrote:I am not asking for special treatment to our kids just a level playing field. At the end of the day should we really have to ask.

let me give you a scenario.

bryce gibbs at 15 has some talent. crows give him a scholarship and in two years can place him on their senior list . not loose a clearly talented junior to the pool and hope for the best.

but obviously the SANFl has got it set up perfectly.
And you've finally acknowledged the real reason behind your objection. Not that not enough SA players wind up on AFL lists (just look at the numbers over the years; they do fine). Rather that you can't kep them tied to SA clubs. Well, that's the 'level playing field', where all 16 clubs have license to roam all over Australia, for ya. If you're opposed to that, fine: but in that case you should be posting 'why the draft is a crock', and not 'everyone move your kids to NSW'.

Incidentally, in case you care, the SANFL does have a number of development schemes for talented young players. Details of the one for under 18s is here. And kids who come up through SA development programs and show more ability and potential at 18yoa, will still get drafted every time over NSW scholarship kids who show less. NSW would be rapt to have 50% of SA's draft numbers.
SimonH
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 62 times

Postby bystander » Fri May 18, 2007 9:18 pm

heater31 wrote:Time to get rid of the draft me thinks or start a breakway national comp and watch those bastards squeal :wink:

Maybe start an ACTUAL AFL, instead of the expanded VFL it currently is!
User avatar
bystander
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Wandering around aimlessly, somewhere!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby bystander » Fri May 18, 2007 9:25 pm

twosheds wrote:By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile.

I reckon that's crap!!! Here on EP we only see a select few recruiting personel, and that's ONLY at Mortlock Shield. (held June long weekend).
User avatar
bystander
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Wandering around aimlessly, somewhere!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby heater31 » Fri May 18, 2007 9:45 pm

bystander wrote:
twosheds wrote:By the time any kid playing footy is 16 his potential ability has already been well scrutinised by all AFL clubs for years along with his parents physical characteristics and psychological profile.

I reckon that's crap!!! Here on EP we only see a select few recruiting personel, and that's ONLY at Mortlock Shield. (held June long weekend).


not entriely true bystander, the SAPSSA sides that go to Adelaide Im sure some of the junior staff have a good look at the kids
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MannyK and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |