by carey » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:08 pm
by mozzie » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:10 pm
carey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:carey wrote:
Wasnt that the west indies?
Yes.
I remember we were in a round at the Queens head before the game it was my buy when we got to the ground i went to the down stairs bar and we i returned WI were 4 for about 10.
From Memory Gilly and Haydon got the runs in somthing stupid like 8 or 9 overs
by Spargo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:19 pm
mozzie wrote:carey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:carey wrote:
Wasnt that the west indies?
Yes.
I remember we were in a round at the Queens head before the game it was my buy when we got to the ground i went to the down stairs bar and we i returned WI were 4 for about 10.
From Memory Gilly and Haydon got the runs in somthing stupid like 8 or 9 overs
This is laughable and now way correct, you would never buy a round!
by stampy » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:34 pm
pafc1870 wrote:At least the Aussies can be happy the game isn't at the SCG, it's just hit 45.7'C there, hottest ever day in Sydney!
by dedja » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:35 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:36 pm
by scoob » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:46 pm
Squids wrote:lol Bailey.
by Roxy the Rat Girl » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:48 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Bring back the good old days when the team selection had a degree of consistency!
by carey » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:49 pm
mozzie wrote:carey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:carey wrote:
Wasnt that the west indies?
Yes.
I remember we were in a round at the Queens head before the game it was my buy when we got to the ground i went to the down stairs bar and we i returned WI were 4 for about 10.
From Memory Gilly and Haydon got the runs in somthing stupid like 8 or 9 overs
This is laughable and now way correct, you would never buy a round!
by locky801 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:51 pm
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Bring back the good old days when the team selection had a degree of consistency!
Lack of team selection consistency is the problem. Everyone worried about getting axed if they don't perform.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:53 pm
locky801 wrote:Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Bring back the good old days when the team selection had a degree of consistency!
Lack of team selection consistency is the problem. Everyone worried about getting axed if they don't perform.
After this performance then they all get axed
by locky801 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:58 pm
by Spargo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:06 pm
by stampy » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:06 pm
by carey » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:07 pm
stampy wrote:3/37, are we a silly chance here?
by locky801 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:07 pm
by carey » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:08 pm
carey wrote:stampy wrote:3/37, are we a silly chance here?
NO.
by Spargo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |