by Pup » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:55 am
by mal » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:00 am
Pup wrote:mal wrote:Here we go again
A predictable response to a batsman playing a productive shot and being dismissed
Cowan played that shot very well against South Africa , and no complaints
Pup
Pafc1870
What do you want batsman to do, give up all shots and block there way to 50 runs in a days play ?
Come on Mal we went down this track with Haddin and many others.
You tell me that wasn't a bad shot or more to the point it was very badly executed. Cowan very rarely plays shots like that so early in innings especially on wickets like this. It was a poor decision and very poorly executed.
by Pup » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:01 am
mal wrote:Pup wrote:mal wrote:Here we go again
A predictable response to a batsman playing a productive shot and being dismissed
Cowan played that shot very well against South Africa , and no complaints
Pup
Pafc1870
What do you want batsman to do, give up all shots and block there way to 50 runs in a days play ?
Come on Mal we went down this track with Haddin and many others.
You tell me that wasn't a bad shot or more to the point it was very badly executed. Cowan very rarely plays shots like that so early in innings especially on wickets like this. It was a poor decision and very poorly executed.
It was a terrible , dreadful embarrasing shot, but one of poor execution
BUT not a shot to put in the closet
Remember Michael Clarke getting out to those offside swishes outside off stump not so long ago, and the critics got into him
But I defended him , because he scores many runs with those forcing back foot offside shots, look at him now
by RustyCage » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:08 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:38 am
whufc wrote:Very disappointed Clarke hasn't moved up to four!
We will smash the Lankans around but long term Clarke can't stay at five!
by whufc » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Very disappointed Clarke hasn't moved up to four!
We will smash the Lankans around but long term Clarke can't stay at five!
Don't change the one thing that is working consistently.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:44 am
whufc wrote:
If he can bat at five he can work at four and it would help the team greatly.
Would rather have the side 2/130, than 3/50 each time.
by whufc » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:48 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:
If he can bat at five he can work at four and it would help the team greatly.
Would rather have the side 2/130, than 3/50 each time.
I think it's all in his head, I get your point though, I just don't want to see the only sure thing we've had recently turn to shit.
by RustyCage » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:55 am
by stampy » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:00 pm
by Pup » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:00 pm
by on the rails » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:01 pm
by stampy » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:01 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:04 pm
by on the rails » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:04 pm
by Tubby » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:08 pm
by Tubby » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:10 pm
Tubby wrote:Pointing to do a lap of honour in the lunch break, why not do it tomorrow when the place could be packed ???
by woodublieve12 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:18 pm
by RustyCage » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:40 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |