Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Did anyone else hear Chapman defending the sacking of Rendell saying he would have been afforded the same concessions as Trigg had it been an isolated incident.
Just wondering what he may have been alluding to there?
Thought the same, have heard Cornes say several times that Rendell had more than 1 strikes against him
They avoided the question last night, I get the impression that he was on his last chance and in the interests of Rendell they do not want to divulge his previous indiscretions.
Not sure that is the right tact as many Crows fans are very dirty about it all, think they need to make a clearer statement about the situation and not hope it will just go away.
As it is don't most Crow supporters and the general football public think Rendell was fired by Vlad pulling the Crows strings? Thats the way i see it, i might be wrong.
Well i probably am wrong if there was more than one incident but it doesnt make sense that Rendell was appointed for 3 more years just before this happened. If he was one incident away from being sacked why appoint for 3 years and not just one.
None of this makes sense, think the Crows should come out and say what his previous indiscretions were, especially if it will place some heat on Collingwood for employing him. Anything that puts heat on EDDIE and turns his head into a beetroot is fine by me
