by Cheech » Fri May 11, 2007 12:56 pm
by Hotdogs » Fri May 11, 2007 1:00 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Hotdogs wrote:The Mexican wrote:petoe wrote:Petes Punting Palace
Round 4
(All line bets pay $1.90)
Home team named first
Aldinga $1.93(+9.5) vs. MV Park $1.82(-9.5)
Morph Vale $1.10(-63.5) vs. Flaay Hill $8.00(+63.5)
Happy Valley $2.00(+13.5) vs. Brighton $1.70(-13.5)
Southern Hawks $18.00(+120.5) vs. Marion $1.01(-120.5)
Porties $2.00(+15.5) vs. Reynella $1.70(-15.5)
Noar. Shoes $2.15(+25.5) vs. Lonsdale $1.62(-25.5)
Cove $1.05(-88.5) vs. Christies $11.00(+88.5)
Made some good money last week with valleys getting "upset" by reynella :)
payed out a couple too:(
I'll have "Franky's" house on The Valley straight out thanks... Can't lose... Cheers
If your from MVale Mexican I'll have your "caravan" on the Bombers.....I can cover it with the spare change in my pocket....
Well you must have some ties with Brighton because theyre the only club I know in the league to so blatantly look down their nose (over the charddonay) at every other team in the league!!
by Hills » Fri May 11, 2007 1:02 pm
by Hotdogs » Fri May 11, 2007 1:04 pm
by The Mexican » Fri May 11, 2007 1:20 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Hotdogs wrote:The Mexican wrote:petoe wrote:Petes Punting Palace
Round 4
(All line bets pay $1.90)
Home team named first
Aldinga $1.93(+9.5) vs. MV Park $1.82(-9.5)
Morph Vale $1.10(-63.5) vs. Flaay Hill $8.00(+63.5)
Happy Valley $2.00(+13.5) vs. Brighton $1.70(-13.5)
Southern Hawks $18.00(+120.5) vs. Marion $1.01(-120.5)
Porties $2.00(+15.5) vs. Reynella $1.70(-15.5)
Noar. Shoes $2.15(+25.5) vs. Lonsdale $1.62(-25.5)
Cove $1.05(-88.5) vs. Christies $11.00(+88.5)
Made some good money last week with valleys getting "upset" by reynella
payed out a couple too:(
I'll have "Franky's" house on The Valley straight out thanks... Can't lose... Cheers
If your from MVale Mexican I'll have your "caravan" on the Bombers.....I can cover it with the spare change in my pocket....
Well you must have some ties with Brighton because theyre the only club I know in the league to so blatantly look down their nose (over the charddonay) at every other team in the league!!
by Hotdogs » Fri May 11, 2007 1:28 pm
by Armytank » Fri May 11, 2007 1:31 pm
Hotdogs wrote:....I married rich...shes bloody ugly but boy is she rich........
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri May 11, 2007 1:37 pm
Hotdogs wrote:If your from MVale Mexican I'll have your "caravan" on the Bombers.....I can cover it with the spare change in my pocket....
by Hotdogs » Fri May 11, 2007 1:58 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Hotdogs wrote:If your from MVale Mexican I'll have your "caravan" on the Bombers.....I can cover it with the spare change in my pocket....
Well you must have some ties with Brighton because theyre the only club I know in the league to so blatantly look down their nose (over the charddonay) at every other team in the league!!
by Hotdogs » Fri May 11, 2007 2:38 pm
Hills wrote:Is this a footy forum?
by sweeny luvs j delsar » Fri May 11, 2007 3:39 pm
by Backhand Panther » Fri May 11, 2007 7:03 pm
by FOOTYGODS » Fri May 11, 2007 9:02 pm
by MatteeG » Fri May 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Backhand Panther wrote:Wonder if that Hackham dickhead is the same one that shattered a 17 year olds nose in the B grade last year against Reynella. Spent the whole game belting blokes until finally getting sent off after elbowing the young bloke in the face behind the play. The coach told him to piss off but was still hanging around after the game thinking he was a hero.
If it is the same player and same B grade coach then the club should be punished for letting him play again.
He clearly wasnt out there to play footy.
Do we really need Hackham in the comp all together???
by sweeny luvs j delsar » Fri May 11, 2007 11:14 pm
by VC » Fri May 11, 2007 11:26 pm
MatteeG wrote:Backhand Panther wrote:Wonder if that Hackham dickhead is the same one that shattered a 17 year olds nose in the B grade last year against Reynella. Spent the whole game belting blokes until finally getting sent off after elbowing the young bloke in the face behind the play. The coach told him to piss off but was still hanging around after the game thinking he was a hero.
If it is the same player and same B grade coach then the club should be punished for letting him play again.
He clearly wasnt out there to play footy.
Do we really need Hackham in the comp all together???
Also wondering if it was the same hero who flattened one of our young fellas last year before being sent off. From memory he got one of our blokes both times we played em. Absolute tosser. Should be banned.
by Hasbeen » Sat May 12, 2007 10:31 am
sweeny luvs j delsar wrote:hey hills is it true that u r trev rigneys bro he is a awsome player i hav seen him play a fair few times wen my team has played lonsdale and also 4 assotiation and also a few league games at south hav u ever played any higher tha just stock standard A grade.if not how does it feel 2 be the second best footballer do u get jelouse of him i also heard he gets paid alot more than u i would hate that
by Backliner » Sat May 12, 2007 12:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |