by Squids » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:14 am
by JK » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:24 am
Squids wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/crows-tamper-affair-20121023-283kp.html
by Squids » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:25 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:21 am
Squids wrote:Should be booted from the AFL at a minimum.
by mickey » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:27 am
JK wrote:Squids wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/crows-tamper-affair-20121023-283kp.html
Ha! So the Crows deny any such "agreement" exists all along, and now not only has it come out, they're risking sanctioning over it .. Don't worry Triggy, I'm sure you can lay all the blame on Matt Rendell.
by UK Fan » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:30 am
JK wrote:Squids wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/crows-tamper-affair-20121023-283kp.html
Ha! So the Crows deny any such "agreement" exists all along, and now not only has it come out, they're risking sanctioning over it .. Don't worry Triggy, I'm sure you can lay all the blame on Matt Rendell.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by PPLions » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:35 am
Squids wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Squids is trolling
"innocent until PROVEN guilty"
by Johno6 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:02 am
by CoverKing » Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:26 am
by HH3 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:44 am
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:03 am
HH3 wrote:Considering it was Trigg that told the AFL the details, does anyone think he did it to keep Tippett out of the AFL all together next year? Maybe they're that pissed at him they'd cop the sanctions just to **** him over...
by HH3 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:10 am
redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:HH3 wrote:Considering it was Trigg that told the AFL the details, does anyone think he did it to keep Tippett out of the AFL all together next year? Maybe they're that pissed at him they'd cop the sanctions just to **** him over...
my thoughts too....willing to take the hit to make him sit out a year.
by D14 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:15 am
by Hondo » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:31 am
by HH3 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:35 am
by OnSong » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:40 am
redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:HH3 wrote:Considering it was Trigg that told the AFL the details, does anyone think he did it to keep Tippett out of the AFL all together next year? Maybe they're that pissed at him they'd cop the sanctions just to **** him over...
my thoughts too....willing to take the hit to make him sit out a year.
by JK » Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:54 am
OnSong wrote:redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:HH3 wrote:Considering it was Trigg that told the AFL the details, does anyone think he did it to keep Tippett out of the AFL all together next year? Maybe they're that pissed at him they'd cop the sanctions just to **** him over...
my thoughts too....willing to take the hit to make him sit out a year.
x3
by HH3 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:05 am
by OnSong » Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:10 am
HH3 wrote:Well as stated before, they can minimize the damage to the reputation of the club by laying some of the blame on Rendell. It just seems a bit weird that Adelaide were the ones that dobbed themselves in, when they couldve just accepted the deal, or let him go to the draft with nothing said, and no harm done.
Whats their motive for telling the AFL they did a dodge?
by scoob » Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:12 am
HH3 wrote:Well as stated before, they can minimize the damage to the reputation of the club by laying some of the blame on Rendell. It just seems a bit weird that Adelaide were the ones that dobbed themselves in, when they couldve just accepted the deal, or let him go to the draft with nothing said, and no harm done.
Whats their motive for telling the AFL they did a dodge?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |