Norwood vs Claremont

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby CENTURION » Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:08 pm

In fact, I'll do it for you.

Jackson Baldwin, Tim Boyd, Brock Castree, Matthew Claughton, Sam Colquhoun, Adam Cullen, Ben Cummings, Thomas Dunne, Caleb Edmead, Sam Hanna, David Haydon, Dallas Hill, Damian Hynes, James Lawton, Jake Martin, Jay Nash, Ben Nason, Chad O'Sullivan, Matthew Prior, Corey Reichert, Travis Schiller, Jason Sutherland, Josh Vater, Matthew Westhoff, Josh Wilson & Josh Wittwer.

so, where are all these discarded AFL players? Where are all these league players who were dropped back for the Grand Final?
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby sjt » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:38 pm

CENTURION wrote:In fact, I'll do it for you.

Jackson Baldwin, Tim Boyd, Brock Castree, Matthew Claughton, Sam Colquhoun, Adam Cullen, Ben Cummings, Thomas Dunne, Caleb Edmead, Sam Hanna, David Haydon, Dallas Hill, Damian Hynes, James Lawton, Jake Martin, Jay Nash, Ben Nason, Chad O'Sullivan, Matthew Prior, Corey Reichert, Travis Schiller, Jason Sutherland, Josh Vater, Matthew Westhoff, Josh Wilson & Josh Wittwer.

so, where are all these discarded AFL players? Where are all these league players who were dropped back for the Grand Final?

I hear crickets.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:50 pm

That'll be the day.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby mal » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:29 am

Dogwatcher wrote:That'll be the day.
:lol:

Well said, Buddy
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29936
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2047 times
Been liked: 2046 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Wedgie » Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:19 am

Oh Boy.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby JamesH » Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:29 am

PhilH wrote:Claremont has 2 straight WAFL flags, off 3 straight minor premierships.

They have balanced this with Foxtel Cup championship this year, runners up last year.


If your comparison of any state league club is over the last 3 years then Claremont is clearly in front.

Norwood & Port Melbourne with 1 flag and a runners up would be the next in line.


If not Claremont ... who?


The SANFL is a great league and undoubtedly the toughest outside the AFL..... but never forget that it is a big importer of talent compared to the VFL & WAFL & that its draft output is reduced in comparison.

Of Claremont's premiership team only 3 were from outside WA; Byron Schammer, Nicholas Suban & Mitchell Andrews. How many SANFL clubs have this much local content.
JamesH
Under 16s
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby passionatelegsfan » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:26 am

[I don't think any teams success has been based on recruiting discarded AFL players.[/quote]



haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.
passionatelegsfan
Member
 
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:55 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby CENTURION » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:35 am

and all I'm saying is We didn't just drop these players back from the league side, so they could play in the reserves grand final, they were there because they were either coming back from injuries, or because they deserved to be there.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Big Phil » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:39 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:I don't think any teams success has been based on recruiting discarded AFL players.

haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.


Ha ha, the Boyd you speak of is James' brother Tim. He has not played League footy...
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20297
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby sjt » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:40 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:[I don't think any teams success has been based on recruiting discarded AFL players.




haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.[/quote]

If you read my comment I didn't say your comment had anything to do necessarily specifically with Centrals. I said I don't think "any teams" success. - so go and read before you get your knickers in a twist. Of the players that played Nason and Westhoff have been on AFL lists, both probably played about two or three league games this year. You did get a "bite" because your posts seem to lack in knowledge. I'm assuming when you list "Boyd" above you thought it was James Boyd not Tim Boyd? Tim Boyd hasn't played a league game for us.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby cennals05 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:43 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:
haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.

Boyd has not played any league games for us so I'm not sure why you've listed him??
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby passionatelegsfan » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:06 am

cennals05 wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:
haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.

Boyd has not played any league games for us so I'm not sure why you've listed him??



ooops your right, looks like I got my Boyd's mixed up. my bad!! What about the other players i mentioned?
passionatelegsfan
Member
 
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:55 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby sjt » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:10 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:
cennals05 wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:
haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.

Boyd has not played any league games for us so I'm not sure why you've listed him??



ooops your right, looks like I got my Boyd's mixed up. my bad!! What about the other players i mentioned?


What about them? They all played a majority of games this year in the reserves, being unable to break into the league team.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby JK » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:13 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:
cennals05 wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:
haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.

Boyd has not played any league games for us so I'm not sure why you've listed him??



ooops your right, looks like I got my Boyd's mixed up. my bad!! What about the other players i mentioned?


What about them? For whatever reason (mostly a reflection of the Dogs injury list throughout the year) they weren't selected in the League team and had played enough Ressies footy to qualify .. Really not sure what your beef is with this??
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:14 am

passionatelegsfan wrote: haha it seems like my comments have stirred up a few centrals supporters. I love it!! Tell me why are you's so sensitive about the issue if what I said was rubbish? Ok since you's are so insistent on pressing the issue here's some names for you, O'Sullivan, Sutherland, Boyd, Nason, Westhoff. yeah i'm sure u can justify it in terms of how many league and reserves games they play. But look at the lists and compare it to Norwood's who had basically all kids playing for them on the day. The only Norwood players on that list with league experience were guys that were forced to be called up due to the horrendous injury toll. They are not exactly seasoned veterans.

By the way if you read the thread carefully you will see that my comment about AFL discards was not aimed at centrals. It was in a response to a comment on page 1 of this thread that said WAFL teams do not have the recuting resources of SANFL clubs and rely more on developing their players. I was trying to say that recruits or AFL discards are only account for a small percentage of norwood's list and their success is based primarly upon the development of their juniors. My comment had nothing to do with centrals. So go and read before yuo get your knickers in a twist.


If you read the thread carefully, I was responding to your claim that the reserves side was stacked. Yes, your club has a lot of depth but you claimed that your side was beaten in reserves GF by a stacked side. You didn't say it was beaten by a side with experienced players.

As for the AFL recruting, I couldn't give a flying Gilbert McAdam about your thoughts on the AFL and the number of players recruited from Norwood.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:17 am

PLF is a case in point that passion should not be mistaken for intelligence.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:10 pm

Why would anyone worry about a Reserves premiership in a year when your club has broken a 15 year premiership drought?

I'd like to say just quietly but this reserves flag has generated more discussion than any other than I can recall in safooty history (the breathless victory thread was certainly most amusing). Typical Central blowhards. 8)

At least it fits in with this Norwood vs Central thread....

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28527
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1769 times
Been liked: 1881 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby CENTURION » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:25 pm

[quote="Rik E Boy"]Why would anyone worry about a Reserves premiership in a year when your club has broken a 15 year premiership drought?

I was thinking exactly the same thing!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby passionatelegsfan » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:31 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Why would anyone worry about a Reserves premiership in a year when your club has broken a 15 year premiership drought?

I'd like to say just quietly but this reserves flag has generated more discussion than any other than I can recall in safooty history (the breathless victory thread was certainly most amusing). Typical Central blowhards. 8)

At least it fits in with this Norwood vs Central thread....

regards,

REB


I agree! Let Centrals have their reserves glory. All i know is that the chimney is now red and blue.
passionatelegsfan
Member
 
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:55 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Norwood vs Claremont

Postby scoob » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:46 pm

passionatelegsfan wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:Why would anyone worry about a Reserves premiership in a year when your club has broken a 15 year premiership drought?

I'd like to say just quietly but this reserves flag has generated more discussion than any other than I can recall in safooty history (the breathless victory thread was certainly most amusing). Typical Central blowhards. 8)

At least it fits in with this Norwood vs Central thread....

regards,

REB


I agree! Let Centrals have their reserves glory. All i know is that the chimney is now red and blue.


Personally im grateful for the fact that you managed to join SAfooty in early september to share your joy of winning a premiership for the first time in 15 years!
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |