My retro-radical view is that there are two types of student - those who are able and pro-active and will research and widen their reading by themselves given time and space to do so, because they are genuinely interested and curious, and those who are there just to get a ticket and will have to be pushed every inch of the way. Turning Universities into degree factories has increased the proportion of the latter group, and the system has been set up now to pump them through rather than support and develop the genuinely intelligent and enterprising.bulldogproud2 wrote: It is a little bit surprising to hear that as the reason behind taking some of the weighting off examinations has been to encourage students to improve their research and analytical skills. If assessment was just via a three hour written examination, there would be little opportunity for research or analytical skills to be assessed. Rather, a lot of those examinations just required you to 'rote learn' for the examination. Within a month or so after the examination, a lot of what you had learned was likely to have been forgotten.
Today, at least students should have skills that they should be able to rely on for life (as long as they are taught well).
Cheers
This is social philosophy and vested interest having its effect on education systems. Some of us think innate genetic talent is the key and should be encouraged, others think we are all born equally able and can be trained into being brilliant.