Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby whufc » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:46 pm

Apachebulldog wrote:Well done Cocks from my observations Boydy and Marschal were sorely missed Hardy must play fullforward in all games and not in ruck Josh Wilson should of been in the side as back up ruck for Hannath so can some tell me were Marscall and Wilson injured if not this was a very poor player selection made by the Doggy coaching panel.


Marschall injured, Wilson ommitted.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28551
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2820 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Apachebulldog » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:54 pm

Thanks WHUFC i still think Wilson should of been given more exposure in the League side we are gonna need another ruckman especially if Pumpa does not front up next week.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby whufc » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:55 pm

Apachebulldog wrote:Thanks WHUFC i still think Wilson should of been given more exposure in the League side we are gonna need another ruckman especially if Pumpa does not front up next week.


Yep i have been saying for ages we need to play 2 ruckmen and then Hardy up forward with worse case he can play in the backlines if required.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28551
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2820 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:57 am

Horrible. Thought we couldn't play any worse than we did against West.
Bruise free as was said earlier.
The only win for us on the night was the North player running into an open goal who bounced and watched it dribble away.

Hardy must play forward to straighten us up.
Where were our defenders?
Where was the pressure on the ball movement? Too often we gave up the middle.
Where was the pack tackling we're famed for?

Anyone make anything of the 9/23 free kick count?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby on the rails » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:39 pm

Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby sjt » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:43 pm

on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!

Maybe his dentist will give evidence.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Mic » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:44 pm

on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!


I clearly saw Gowans elbowing Bennett in the head a few times when he was on top of him. Bennett got up and kept playing...
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3126
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby sjt » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:47 pm

on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!


The irony of you posting the above after posting the below previously:

" Re: Former Glenelg Forward Justin McConnell King Hit

We wonder why parents want their kids to play other sports when $hit like this happens.

The last game of football I played which was in a country league and my first for the year in the A grade lasted the first minute and half of the game - I was king hit from behind and spent 2 days in hospital with severe concussion. The main reason for the hit I was told later was becuase of my occupation. I extracted my revenge several months later!"

_________________
NAFC - 1972 Champions of Australia!
Last edited by sjt on Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby heater31 » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:51 pm

Is Gowans in hospital with a broken jaw :shock:
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16651
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Big Phil » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:59 pm

heater31 wrote:Is Gowans in hospital with a broken jaw :shock:

Not that I'm aware of, but had his two front teeth knocked out, apparently?
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20297
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:19 pm

Dear oh dear.

Where is the pic of one Gowans punching the Norwood player, while the other has him in a headlock?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:28 pm

I'm sure that will be used as evidence by the SANFL tribunal in this case.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby CENTURION » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:06 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Dear oh dear.

Where is the pic of one Gowans punching the Norwood player, while the other has him in a headlock?

but it was only Clements.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby CENTURION » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:07 pm

on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!

maybe it wasn't Gowans that "dobbed"
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:25 pm

Was it a player or official?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Dutchy » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:29 pm

whufc wrote:
Agree, but the 21 playing last night pretty much new they were secured a spot next week.



Where is Nason?

CD fans kept telling me he would be a key recruit this year!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45958
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2576 times
Been liked: 4187 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby CENTURION » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:32 pm

Dutchy wrote:
whufc wrote:
Agree, but the 21 playing last night pretty much new they were secured a spot next week.



Where is Nason?

CD fans kept telling me he would be a key recruit this year!

do you want Him? He'd walk into your league side!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby Big Phil » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:35 pm

CENTURION wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
whufc wrote:
Agree, but the 21 playing last night pretty much new they were secured a spot next week.



Where is Nason?

CD fans kept telling me he would be a key recruit this year!

do you want Him? He'd walk into your league side!

Has missed the majority of the year with a back and groin injury. Has been back playing reserves the last 4 weeks and was easily best on ground in the Dogs' 2's last week.

Would be coming under close consideration for League selection this week...

What's with your fascination for Nason, Dutchy, you post more about him (and Ed Sansbury) than you do your own players?
Last edited by Big Phil on Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20297
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby locky801 » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:36 pm

on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!



From what I have been told perhaps Clinch just has to show the Tribunual the injury he sustained stemming from this incident and it should hopefully be thrown out, perhaps they should scrape under Mr Gowans fingernails for the evidence
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58663
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4395 times
Been liked: 1419 times

Re: Rnd 24 - Central v North POST GAME DISCUSSIONS

Postby CENTURION » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:37 pm

locky801 wrote:
on the rails wrote:Clinch cited by the SANFL Tribunal. No video of the alleged strike against the Central's player (one of the Gowans) nor was the alleged offence seen by any umpire so the report was made on the basis of Gowan's complaining to the umpire that Clinch hit him!

So referred straight to the Tribunal so I assume Gowan's will have to give evidence that it was Clinch who allegedly hit him? So it will be the word of one player against another being the only evidence.

The irony of a Gowan's running to the umpire and dobbing!



From what I have been told perhaps Clinch just has to show the Tribunual the injury he sustained stemming from this incident and it should hopefully be thrown out, perhaps they should scrape under Mr Gowans fingernails for the evidence

Boydy retaliated the other day & got 2 weeks.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |