by Big Phil » Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:47 pm
by Jimmy » Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:55 pm
by cennals05 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:45 pm
by whufc » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:47 pm
cennals05 wrote:We won. Our skills were terrible at times. Great to see Hayesy and Obst in the reserves. Both looked ok considering how long they've been out.
Duldig gets fatter every time I see him.
by UK Fan » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:54 pm
Jimmy wrote:Not disgraced
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by purch » Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:14 pm
Big Phil wrote:Reports - J.Boyd (CD) for striking M.Jaensch (ST)
by sjt » Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:28 pm
purch wrote:Big Phil wrote:Reports - J.Boyd (CD) for striking M.Jaensch (ST)
Hmmm...looked like a fist to the face, off the ball, which should see a few matches.
The result was predictable but the margin lower than expected. I felt that Sturt played some good footy in the first and final qtrs but their tendency to go wide at all costs in the second and third put pay to any chance of a victory. That was Ben Kane's best game in Sturt colours I reckon. Jaensch and Tambling were excellent, and if Anderson gets some goal kicking practice he'll make as good a forward as he is a defender. Krause, Sheeds and Greenslade were also good.
A big thanks to Symes for amusing us in the last quarter with his numerous stuff ups. His kicking is overrated.
by purch » Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:54 pm
sjt wrote:A big thanks to sturt for allowing us to work some good passages of play, helped to instil a bit of confidence around the club
by sjt » Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:08 pm
purch wrote:sjt wrote:A big thanks to sturt for allowing us to work some good passages of play, helped to instil a bit of confidence around the club
I'm not sure that "allow" is the right word for it....perhaps "making us work hard for a few passages of play" is more accurate, but hey, seeing arrogance is one of your traits..![]()
A big thanks to the "finger dogs" ...the Gowans lads for their finger pointing - they put Sebastian Vettel to shame but he has more years ahead of him to catch up
p.s. retaliation is no excuse, but I'm sure you already know that
by sjt » Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:30 pm
purch wrote:sjt wrote:A big thanks to sturt for allowing us to work some good passages of play, helped to instil a bit of confidence around the club
I'm not sure that "allow" is the right word for it....perhaps "making us work hard for a few passages of play" is more accurate, but hey, seeing arrogance is one of your traits..![]()
A big thanks to the "finger dogs" ...the Gowans lads for their finger pointing - they put Sebastian Vettel to shame but he has more years ahead of him to catch up
p.s. retaliation is no excuse, but I'm sure you already know that
by CENTURION » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:55 pm
purch wrote:sjt wrote:A big thanks to sturt for allowing us to work some good passages of play, helped to instil a bit of confidence around the club
I'm not sure that "allow" is the right word for it....perhaps "making us work hard for a few passages of play" is more accurate, but hey, seeing arrogance is one of your traits..![]()
A big thanks to the "finger dogs" ...the Gowans lads for their finger pointing - they put Sebastian Vettel to shame but he has more years ahead of him to catch up
p.s. retaliation is no excuse, but I'm sure you already know that
by CENTURION » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:00 pm
sjt wrote:purch wrote:sjt wrote:A big thanks to sturt for allowing us to work some good passages of play, helped to instil a bit of confidence around the club
I'm not sure that "allow" is the right word for it....perhaps "making us work hard for a few passages of play" is more accurate, but hey, seeing arrogance is one of your traits..![]()
A big thanks to the "finger dogs" ...the Gowans lads for their finger pointing - they put Sebastian Vettel to shame but he has more years ahead of him to catch up
p.s. retaliation is no excuse, but I'm sure you already know that
"a big thanks" to the gowans for "finger pointing"..are you serious?
by therisingblues » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:35 pm
by CENTURION » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:41 pm
therisingblues wrote:I read on the scores thread that theargin was about 25 points about halfway through the final quarter after being 50 at 3 Q time. Must have been an interesting beginning to the final Q. For Sturt fans anyway. Anyone got a perspective on this?
by bulldog2004 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:51 pm
therisingblues wrote:I read on the scores thread that theargin was about 25 points about halfway through the final quarter after being 50 at 3 Q time. Must have been an interesting beginning to the final Q. For Sturt fans anyway. Anyone got a perspective on this?
by whufc » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:59 pm
by therisingblues » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:48 pm
CENTURION wrote:therisingblues wrote:I read on the scores thread that theargin was about 25 points about halfway through the final quarter after being 50 at 3 Q time. Must have been an interesting beginning to the final Q. For Sturt fans anyway. Anyone got a perspective on this?
yes, what happened was this. Sturt kicked a few goals, thus reducing the margin to the 25 points that you mentioned. Then Central scored some, which blew the margin out to the final amount. All in all, We won but I must say it was one of the most boring games that I have witnessed for some time.
by twosheds » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:06 pm
therisingblues wrote:CENTURION wrote:therisingblues wrote:I read on the scores thread that theargin was about 25 points about halfway through the final quarter after being 50 at 3 Q time. Must have been an interesting beginning to the final Q. For Sturt fans anyway. Anyone got a perspective on this?
yes, what happened was this. Sturt kicked a few goals, thus reducing the margin to the 25 points that you mentioned. Then Central scored some, which blew the margin out to the final amount. All in all, We won but I must say it was one of the most boring games that I have witnessed for some time.
Wow, Sturt reduced the margin by kicking GOALS! Of all the things it could have been too.
by therisingblues » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:43 pm
twosheds wrote:therisingblues wrote:CENTURION wrote:therisingblues wrote:I read on the scores thread that theargin was about 25 points about halfway through the final quarter after being 50 at 3 Q time. Must have been an interesting beginning to the final Q. For Sturt fans anyway. Anyone got a perspective on this?
yes, what happened was this. Sturt kicked a few goals, thus reducing the margin to the 25 points that you mentioned. Then Central scored some, which blew the margin out to the final amount. All in all, We won but I must say it was one of the most boring games that I have witnessed for some time.
Wow, Sturt reduced the margin by kicking GOALS! Of all the things it could have been too.
Selective reading and mindless sarcasm big in Japan is it ? "thus"is the operative word you seem to have missed.
by CENTURION » Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |