Match Review Panel

[Johno6]

still amazed wellinghams didnt go straight there also.

[HH3]

CARLTON captain Chris Judd will face the AFL Tribunal over his controversial 'chicken-wing' tackle on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams after the match review panel chose to send the case straight to the judiciary.

Judd was reported by a boundary umpire and charged with rough conduct over for the second-quarter incident on Friday night in which he wrenched Adams' arm back while the Kangaroos midfielder lay on the ground with Andrew Carrazzo on top of him.

The medical report tabled by North Melbourne to the MRP is understood to have said that the tackle dislocated Adams' shoulder

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

No penalty by the MRP then, straight to the tribunal...

Whats the difference between the two?

[Turbo]

still amazed wellinghams didnt go straight there also.

There lies the inconsistency. Bottom line is Judd being suspended isn't gonna make any difference to our season so he it. We should be put some youngsters in now anyway

[Brodlach]

CARLTON captain Chris Judd will face the AFL Tribunal over his controversial 'chicken-wing' tackle on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams after the match review panel chose to send the case straight to the judiciary.

Judd was reported by a boundary umpire and charged with rough conduct over for the second-quarter incident on Friday night in which he wrenched Adams' arm back while the Kangaroos midfielder lay on the ground with Andrew Carrazzo on top of him.

The medical report tabled by North Melbourne to the MRP is understood to have said that the tackle dislocated Adams' shoulder

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

No penalty by the MRP then, straight to the tribunal...

Whats the difference between the two?

More than 5 games?

[Q.]

still amazed wellinghams didnt go straight there also.

Because it wasn't deemed intentional.

[CoverKing]

CARLTON captain Chris Judd will face the AFL Tribunal over his controversial 'chicken-wing' tackle on North Melbourne's Leigh Adams after the match review panel chose to send the case straight to the judiciary.

Judd was reported by a boundary umpire and charged with rough conduct over for the second-quarter incident on Friday night in which he wrenched Adams' arm back while the Kangaroos midfielder lay on the ground with Andrew Carrazzo on top of him.

The medical report tabled by North Melbourne to the MRP is understood to have said that the tackle dislocated Adams' shoulder

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

No penalty by the MRP then, straight to the tribunal...

Whats the difference between the two?

More than 5 games?

Just means no point system. Purely based on how many weeks he should get!

Cant get an early guilty plea now either

[hearts on fire]

Judd shouldn't get more than Wellingham, should get no more than 2 games.

[CoverKing]

Judd shouldn't get more than Wellingham, should get no more than 2 games.

Reckon he should get more IMO

[HH3]

Judd shouldn't get more than Wellingham, should get no more than 2 games.

Reckon he should get more IMO

Judds was 100% intentional, and more akin to a UFC fight, if it was a two on one and the other guy held Adams down. Piss weak thing to do.

Wellinghams was reckless, and if he looked at the ball, probably wouldve only got 1 week at most.

[OnSong]

Why are they calling it a "chicken-wing" tackle?

Who has their mate hold a chicken down while the other rips its wing off?

[Sorry Dude]

Judd shouldn't get more than Wellingham, should get no more than 2 games.

Reckon he should get more IMO

Judds was 100% intentional, and more akin to a UFC fight, if it was a two on one and the other guy held Adams down. Piss weak thing to do.

Wellinghams was reckless, and if he looked at the ball, probably wouldve only got 1 week at most.

If he looked at the ball he wouldn't have got anything.

Judd's was weak and is not in the spirit of the game.

[Johno6]

thats what i do at kfc,

p.s he didnt actually rip adams arm off........ just dislocated it.
maybe he was trying to help him and he has a history of shoulder injuries and was just giving him some stretches to help.

[Sorry Dude]

[quote="Johno6"]thats what i do at kfc,

p.s he didnt actually rip adams arm off........ just dislocated it.
maybe he was trying to help him and he has a history of shoulder injuries and was just giving him some stretches to help.[/quote]

[HH3]

WHAT IS THIS SHIT!! Zeebs definately was looking and going for the ball and gets 4 F!#KIN WEEKS!!! What a load of shit!!!

[OnSong]

Yeah, hear the umpire "he went the footy". Exactly right.

[HH3]

Yeah, hear the umpire "he went the footy". Exactly right.

Unbelievable...

Judd better get 8 then coz this is bullshit...

[Johno6]

haha
crazy

and jamison didnt get offered anything for the knees on petrie.

i honestly think they shake the 8 ball and asks for the amount of weeks sometimes.

its amusing when this year a player hasnt been given a free kick or the walker case he gets a free kick and then it ends in suspension.

[Sorry Dude]

haha
crazy

and jamison didnt get offered anything for the knees on petrie.

i honestly think they shake the 8 ball and asks for the amount of weeks sometimes.

its amusing when this year a player hasnt been given a free kick or the walker case he gets a free kick and then it ends in suspension.

That stuck out like dogs balls. I think even Stevie Wonder saw that. Zeibel should get it down to 1 but he shouldn't be getting any. He wasn't even reported on the night.

[overloaded]

what a joke.... 4 weeks for that.

NRL it is

[HH3]

Just sent this scathing email to the AFL...wonder if they'll reply.

Hi

Ive just seen Jack Ziebell has been given 4 weeks reduced to 3 for going for the ball in Friday nights game. Im just wondering how many people the AFL are willing to alienate by letting the current Match Review Panel to operate as it is.

How can a player be suspended when he is looking at the ball, running towards the direction the ball is coming from, and jumps to receive the ball at its highest point (which we've all been taught to do during junior footy)?

Isnt it "charging" if the Carlton player runs with the flight of the ball and collides with another player?

And the biggest defence for Zeebs is the umpire can clearly be heard yelling "he went for the ball, he was going for the ball". No free kick awarded.

So in essence, the MRP are undermining the umpires employed by the AFL. How are players supposed to respect umpires that have no authority?

Juddy must be sweating it right now, because surely what he did to Leigh Adams was much, much worse. Going by previous MRP decisions, they'll probably arrange for him to get Jason Bedding Man of the Match, but if they're serious, he should get 8+.

I look forward to your reply.

Brad