The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:07 pm

Gozu wrote:Have you no shame? You're even worse than Psyber.


Ha Ha

Says the bloke that continually $hitbags The Advertiser and Australian but uses it any chance he can.
My "Liberal source" says you're full of $hit

You're worse than R&B
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15078
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 830 times
Been liked: 1276 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Sky Pilot » Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:11 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Gozu wrote:Have you no shame? You're even worse than Psyber.


Ha Ha

Says the bloke that continually $hitbags The Advertiser and Australian but uses it any chance he can.
My "Liberal source" says you're full of $hit

You're worse than R&B

No one is worse than R&B! Lets be fair dinkum Jim
People who bought this book also bought a stool and some rope. Unknown literary critic
User avatar
Sky Pilot
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Stone Hut Bakery
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: BMW

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:19 pm

Just went to the throne room and my "liberal source" says he is
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15078
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 830 times
Been liked: 1276 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby southee » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:54 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:He copped a pasting this morning as well and I only came in on the end of it
They are all trained to avoid the question
I lost all respect for Bob Carr this morning =;


I lost all respect for Bob Carr many, many years ago !!! :evil:
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby mick » Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:12 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Gozu wrote:Have you no shame? You're even worse than Psyber.


Ha Ha

Says the bloke that continually $hitbags The Advertiser and Australian but uses it any chance he can.
My "Liberal source" says you're full of $hit

You're worse than R&B


The hypocrisy of the left :lol:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:04 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Gozu wrote:Have you no shame? You're even worse than Psyber.


Ha Ha

Says the bloke that continually $hitbags The Advertiser and Australian but uses it any chance he can.
My "Liberal source" says you're full of $hit

You're worse than R&B


lol Yeah I link to The Australian all the time (hard to do given I don't read it) and obviously The Advertiser is the only mainstream paper in town.

Nah actually I've decided I'll just take your word for it!
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13842
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 680 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:29 pm

THE state MP facing child pornography allegations in court has now been charged with new and more serious offences.

In the Adelaide Magistrates Court today, the prosecution withdrew the existing seven charges against the former Labor representative, but laid a fresh information alleging 14 offences of obtaining access to child pornography. Seven of those charges are aggravated.

The offences are alleged to have occurred between August 6, 2010, and April 12, 2011.

After a pre-trial conference held in a closed court, the media was allowed into the courtroom to hear prosecutor John Wells reveal the accused would now face 14 charges, some of which are major indictable.

Major indictable offences are considered to be charges of such gravity that they are heard in the District Court before a jury, rather than the Magistrates Court.


http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6412050535
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13842
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 680 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:43 am

Tom Richardson on the Cadell ferry backflip and the Libs Deputy Leader saga, Jimmy's going to be pretty upset now!

Swings and roundabouts, too, for Mitch Williams, the Opposition’s Deputy Leader still poisonously on the nose with his colleagues, to the point that he was rolled in a party-room vote for a position on the Liberals’ state council.

A couple of weeks ago, a colleague of mine (a respected member of the press gallery) peered curiously down at Mitch as the House of Assembly’s members gathered for another combative Question Time.

This reporter seemed lost in thought as he studiously assessed what had changed about the blustering Member for Mackillop.

Finally the penny dropped: “Has Mitch shaved his beard off?” he asked, surprised.

He had. About four years ago.

The episode seems an apt metaphor for explaining why so many in the Liberal party-room are vocally underwhelmed by Mitch Williams’ performance.

He continues to fly under the radar, barely making an impression.

He calls for serious questions to be asked, without asking them.

Isobel Redmond shafted Martin Hamilton-Smith as her elected deputy because she didn’t want an offsider who might have a realistic hope of usurping her job. On that front, at least, roping in Williams was a masterstroke, since he has no hope in Hades of leading the Liberal Party.

The irony is that he appears to have put some noses so far out of joint that he could bring Redmond’s leadership down with him.

After all, she effectively installed him as deputy, and it will be a direct reflection on her judgement if his colleagues decide he is not up to the job.

For this reason, he is probably safe for now. Much as many may want him gone, removing him would effectively mean removing Redmond as well, and that is a far more serious proposition.

But the Liberals must determine whether this issue can be resolved (or at least ignored) in the interests of unity, or whether it will continue to fester. Because if the latter, the party is in serious trouble, in danger of reverting to the unfocussed rabble of previous incarnations.

If the Government can kick off the week with an embarrassing backdown from a mean-spirited budget saving, and still end the week relatively unscathed, it does suggest a certain lack of drive on the Opposition side.


http://indaily.wordpress.com/2012/06/29 ... backflips/
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13842
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 680 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:56 am

Funny how you only post the part about Mitch Williams and left the part about an ineffective and indecisive government.
I really couldn't care less about Mitch Williams.
My point is how biased your posts are in an attempt to avert the attention away from a totally useless government.
I heard Pat Conlon trying to talk his way out of this mess and he was totally bamboozled on 5AN
Weatherill is now doing what Rann tried to do in his dying days - try to win the popular vote at the expense of his colleagues
Nobody in the government will know what back flip will be coming next.
The past 3 years has been a total waste and the State is now facing bankruptcy because of these muppets
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15078
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 830 times
Been liked: 1276 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:14 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:Funny how you only post the part about Mitch Williams and left the part about an ineffective and indecisive government.
I really couldn't care less about Mitch Williams.
My point is how biased your posts are in an attempt to avert the attention away from a totally useless government.
I heard Pat Conlon trying to talk his way out of this mess and he was totally bamboozled on 5AN
Weatherill is now doing what Rann tried to do in his dying days - try to win the popular vote at the expense of his colleagues
Nobody in the government will know what back flip will be coming next.
The past 3 years has been a total waste and the State is now facing bankruptcy because of these muppets


I knew you'd be upset just not that upset!

1. I mentioned the Cadell ferry backflip.

2. I don't doubt that you don't care about Mitch Williams none of your fellow Liberal Party hacks do either.

3. I've made plenty of criticisms of this state Labor govt both on here and elsewhere in the past (I dropped some inside info I got on here during the 2010 election campaign, critical of Mike Rann you and only you asked me to clarify some of this info, and 3-4 days later it appeared in the press with The Advertiser beating it right up, it confirmed my suspicions about you). We're all biased just some a little more than others Jimmy!

4. Bankruptcy? Oh dear. Laying the groundwork for selling off more public assets if you get in in 2014 mate? A bit early in the piece for that.

Edit: Just including the quote of his post in case he decides to go back and delete it, wouldn't be the first time either.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13842
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 680 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:25 am

Not upset at all
You "mentioned" the Cadell ferry? You carefully edited the piece to slant it one way and "mentioned" it so you could say you mentioned it
As for "Laying the groundwork for selling off more public assets if you get in in 2014 mate" where TF have you been in the past 10 years. There's nothing left. Your useless mob have sold it or are selling it off.
You're right. Sometimes I think why argue. As I said before, Dad always said don't argue with drunks and f***wits.
I never did ask him what to do with a combination of the two
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15078
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 830 times
Been liked: 1276 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby dedja » Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:20 am

Not strictly political but noteworthy nevertheless ... the appointment of Chief Justice Chris Kourakis.

Chris is a top bloke who richly deserves the position he now holds. Well done mate.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/faster-ch ... 6412714621
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 764 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Psyber » Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:27 pm

Gozu wrote: ..4. Bankruptcy? Oh dear. Laying the groundwork for selling off more public assets if you get in in 2014 mate? A bit early in the piece for that.
I'm not sure there is much left to sell!
Most state assets, sadly, had to go after the Bannon fiasco, and the present government is already disposing of the rest to kept its unfunded liabilities down to just massive...
(Now the unfunded state superannuation liability is a lot more than the $8 billion it was under Bannon.)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:58 pm

Mitch Williams' role as a shadow water minister has to be tenuous - particularly the water one.
Given my previous location I pay a bit of attention to the portfolio and he never seems to lay a glove on the government.
He's been pretty much absent in the River Murray debate.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:02 pm

Anyone want a job for life?
Member for Schubert Ivan Venning is formally set to confirm he won't be standing for Schubert at the next election.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby dedja » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:06 pm

Will anyone actually notice when here retires?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 764 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:30 pm

Who? :shock:
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15078
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 830 times
Been liked: 1276 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby dedja » Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:12 pm

Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 764 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby scoob » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:07 pm



With the amount of work these guys put in it is well deserved!
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Sojourner » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:19 am

Unemployment in S.A jumps 1.2% in a month, 16 000 full time jobs lost. Yet according to Jack Snelling its all an anomoly...

Perhaps it does actually have something to do with S.A being the highest taxing state in Australia? When companies like Castalloy and others pull up stumps and move offshore or interstate, what are the State Government doing to replace those jobs and to grow the economy with more jobs as the population grows? - SFA apparently....

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/ ... 6424381264
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kahuna and 0 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |