by Big Phil » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:44 pm
by Jimmy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:46 pm
by luketorrens » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:51 pm
by LBT » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:36 pm
by stampy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:57 pm
by locky801 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:59 pm
stampy wrote:atrocious, pathetic, deplorable, frustrating, hopeless, inconsistent............no not the eagles but the magots, it would go close to the worst exhibition of umpiring ever!
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:59 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:00 pm
locky801 wrote:stampy wrote:atrocious, pathetic, deplorable, frustrating, hopeless, inconsistent............no not the eagles but the magots, it would go close to the worst exhibition of umpiring ever!
Really seems to be a common theme of late
by Aerie » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:01 pm
by Aerie » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:locky801 wrote:stampy wrote:atrocious, pathetic, deplorable, frustrating, hopeless, inconsistent............no not the eagles but the magots, it would go close to the worst exhibition of umpiring ever!
Really seems to be a common theme of late
Tell me a time when fans were happy with the umpiring?
They affect less than 5% of the game yet people continue to focus on them
by stampy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:06 pm
Dutchy wrote:locky801 wrote:stampy wrote:atrocious, pathetic, deplorable, frustrating, hopeless, inconsistent............no not the eagles but the magots, it would go close to the worst exhibition of umpiring ever!
Really seems to be a common theme of late
Tell me a time when fans were happy with the umpiring?
They affect less than 5% of the game yet people continue to focus on them
by Strawb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:22 pm
Aerie wrote:Dutchy wrote:locky801 wrote:stampy wrote:atrocious, pathetic, deplorable, frustrating, hopeless, inconsistent............no not the eagles but the magots, it would go close to the worst exhibition of umpiring ever!
Really seems to be a common theme of late
Tell me a time when fans were happy with the umpiring?
They affect less than 5% of the game yet people continue to focus on them
Fans are happy when you don't notice them. The three out there today were awful.
by Mr Fuller » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:33 pm
Aerie wrote:You can look at it any way you like, but a loss is a loss and a loss by 47 points is significant. The bottom line was Glenelg were more efficient and at times when the game was on the line they had all the answers, as most sides have against the Eagles this year. The Eagles were smashed in the centre during that 2nd quarter and that was with all of our experienced players in the middle.
Goldsworthy and Sumner I thought were our two best. I thought Killian looked better than any of the other 2nd rucks we've tried this year. It is time to plan for 2013 and kick start by getting important game time in to the players that will take us forward while there is still experience around them.
The two reports were nothing more than the umpires fretting over some physicality and the umpiring for the entire game was diabolical. In general the Eagles may have got the better of it as well but the inconsistency and interpretations are a massive issue.
Well done Glenelg. The better side won. I thought Mules going forward was really handy for Glenelg.
by Dirko » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:35 pm
by dedja » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:36 pm
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:43 pm
by on the rails » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:44 pm
by dedja » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:47 pm
by Aerie » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:47 pm
therisingblues wrote:How did the Eagles look in the first quarter and the second half of the third. In the first they'd had way more shots on goal and then they closed to within 16 points at three quarter time. That'd suggest they played at least some football, but no one has made mention of it yet.
by wedgetail » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:53 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |