CUTTERMAN wrote:Funny, I've bought beer from there heaps of times and never been asked, as have mates from other clubs.
Desperate times.
by Spargo » Tue May 15, 2012 8:57 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Funny, I've bought beer from there heaps of times and never been asked, as have mates from other clubs.
by southee » Tue May 15, 2012 8:58 pm
Spargo wrote:Remember being at unley a few years back and going to a beer tent next to the stands to buy some cans.
"Members only" was the response, with which I produced my GFC badge.
"Sturt members you dickhead" was the next pearl. Stupidly I asked where the closest "public" beer outlet was, to which he replied "don't know, don't care".
We smuggle our own grog into the playground now.
Little things like this dig your own grave.....
by The Apostle » Tue May 15, 2012 9:13 pm
heater31 wrote:robranisgod wrote:Aerie wrote:Sojourner wrote:Clearly the two options are a partnership with the Royal Show Committee at Wayville for a redeveloped oval there, or to petition the State Government for the same deal as South Adelaide to relocate. Discussion is already about that there could be a land swap at Mt Barker for the local oval for development purposes and a new oval to be built in another hills location for the Mt Barker area, if Sturt could get into that and had the funds and the support from their members to make the move it would set the club up for the next 100 years.
Would love to see an SANFL game there. It's a great venue. Would be awesome if the SANFL could somehow have a game there at the beginning of the Royal Show. Perhaps that first Friday night before the ground gets hacked up by horses - West vs Sturt?
West played there before the second world war, but it looks much too small to me to host a league footy match. Perhaps if they got rid of the old trotting track around the outside it might then be just big enough.
According to near maps the grass surface is roughly 182m x 103m but with the gravel track its 205m x 124m
by The Apostle » Tue May 15, 2012 9:28 pm
csbowes wrote:There are notes there suggesting we've written off $170K in unpaid sponsorship... I remember this being spoken about months back, but I haven't heard any details on how it happened, what happened and who it was?
by Jim05 » Tue May 15, 2012 11:00 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:csbowes wrote:There are notes there suggesting we've written off $170K in unpaid sponsorship... I remember this being spoken about months back, but I haven't heard any details on how it happened, what happened and who it was?
Name and shame the bums!!!
by mickey » Wed May 16, 2012 3:26 pm
by southee » Wed May 16, 2012 3:28 pm
mickey wrote:Where are all the Sturt people who all said that there was nothing wrong with the clubs financial status when it was raised on here last year?
?
by kneedeepinthehoopla » Wed May 16, 2012 10:37 pm
by dedja » Wed May 16, 2012 11:32 pm
by robranisgod » Wed May 16, 2012 11:43 pm
dedja wrote:North can manage to be shite on the field and brilliant off ... just saying
by dedja » Wed May 16, 2012 11:44 pm
by csbowes » Thu May 17, 2012 12:03 am
by dedja » Thu May 17, 2012 12:09 am
by Psyber » Thu May 17, 2012 1:04 pm
One of their problems may be that the locals are not much into beer and poker machines, or the type of dining that goes with them.csbowes wrote:The problem is that Sturt have had no money even when we were always in the finals... lets remember that Sturt was in the finals almost every season from 1997-2010... yet we never seem to get ahead. We just seem to be one of those clubs that never breaks free from the shackles of poverty.
I also follow North Melbourne, so maybe it's something to do with me?
by whufc » Thu May 17, 2012 1:13 pm
by Psyber » Thu May 17, 2012 5:53 pm
by Cambridge Clarrie » Thu May 17, 2012 6:13 pm
southee wrote:mickey wrote:Where are all the Sturt people who all said that there was nothing wrong with the clubs financial status when it was raised on here last year?
?
Cambridge Clarrie where are you??
by Spargo » Thu May 17, 2012 8:36 pm
Psyber wrote:Once upon a time the Unley area was a more heterogeneous social environment than it is now.
(The average football fan would struggle to afford a house there now if they didn't inherit it.)
A football team needs to be surrounded by people who will spend money at its venue.
Unley doesn't offer that, and just playing at Wayville or Adelaide Oval won't fix it.
They need a money making venue in a more beer and pokies orientated environment.
Mt Barker may work.
I suspect Norwood's venue wouldn't do as well if located at Norwood either, though Norwood as an area perhaps offers a broader social mix than Unley.
by Barto » Thu May 17, 2012 10:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |