I take that back.
Until the umpires can seriously vote properly and have any idea about how to give out medal votes, then the Hewett Medal, both in the way its presented and voted on, will mean squat. Taking nothing away from the winner as he is the best cricketer in the comp and a deserving winner.
However, i could bring out numerous games where the votes are unable to be justified. For example, round 1. Western Youth v Glenelg ANA.
Western Youth 9/240 batting first in the one dayer v Glenelg ANA 154
3 Votes R. Hopkins (20 and 0/7 off 5)
2 votes S. Visser (1 no and 2/26 off

1 Vote A. Zuvela (5 and 0/31 off

Considering Hopkins was the 5th highest scorer for us to start off, that doesnt make a good case for him.
At one stage we were 5/67 and in all sorts, where Pressy (51) and Al Stenson (49) got together and put on 95 for the 6th wicket. Chris Allen also made 51 (off around 25 balls) batting at number 9 and got us to a great total of 240 off the 6 overs.
In the field Todd Goodrich took 4/43 off 8 for the bays and Basso took 2/21 off 3 overs (wickets off both Stenson and Press).
When it come to us bowling, Rowey made 51, Galliford 37 and no one else over 15. After putting on 44 and looking to take the game away from us, both batters looking ominous, young Ollie McDowall, came on removing Rowe, Galliford and 2 other wickets, to take 4/39 off 7 overs.
Visser and Hopkins didnt get a vote in our club awards for that game. Votes were given to Pressy, Ollie and Al (award that is voted on 11 players from the game). Chris Allen was unlucky considering he scored 51 and really took the game away from Glenelg ANA.
How any of the vote getters got a vote, let alone all three of them in there is beyond me.
Until i found out who umpired us. Bob Fradd. What a wank is that bloke.
For what its worth my votes for that game.
3. Pressy
2. Stenson
1. any one of McDowall, Allen, Rowe, Wright, Goodrich