by Mark_Beswick » Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:48 pm
by on the rails » Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:55 pm
by JK » Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:26 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:37 pm
by ChickCock » Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:38 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:so if west are gonna finish bottom 3 and north bottom 2
was last night an early battle or the spoon
by Blacky » Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:41 pm
Mark_Beswick wrote:To stop flooding, go back to a 2 man bench - No side will have the runners to cope with less interchange to run up and down the field - The sub rule has already improved the flood stats in the AFL.
We should have left the game alone years ago
More on the bench helps clubs with greater depth anyway.
Less players would increase strenght of all grades in the SANFL by one player. Less match payments - More long kicking and will bring the high mark back later in the games when it slows. The case that there will be more injuries doesnt work - The players are more tired with less interchange and collisions are not the high speed impact later in the game. Remember those heroic wins your side (whoever you support) had with 16 men and two gutsing it out in a forward pocket often taking that mark and scoring to win a game. It brought about that spirit of never say die. Maybe I'm a romatic for old style contested footy but this flooding game does not work. West have the player to be in the top five but wont get there when the midfields get the ball look up and have to go sideways because there is no one forward of 50.
by FlyingHigh » Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:45 pm
by Blacky » Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:57 pm
whufc wrote:On a serious note apparently Collins was being harrassed in the clubrooms by fans and members, if they get their way Collins out Mickan in by end of month.
by goraw » Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:39 pm
by Wolf Pack » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:24 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:25 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:53 pm
Wolf Pack wrote:Every Sanfl club floods, that is the way the game is played now, 32 players often at one end of the ground. It is a joke. Collins in his 5th year. In a 9 team comp where 5 teams play finals, to not participate at all is not good enough. Time to go at seasons end Collo
by geppscrossrams » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:35 pm
whufc wrote:Wolf Pack wrote:Every Sanfl club floods, that is the way the game is played now, 32 players often at one end of the ground. It is a joke. Collins in his 5th year. In a 9 team comp where 5 teams play finals, to not participate at all is not good enough. Time to go at seasons end Collo
Are you R&B in disguise, West are by far the biggest flooders and most unattractive side to watch in the SANFL, almost certain 90% of sanfl supporters who dont follow West would agree.
by Pseudo » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:35 pm
Dutchy wrote:Seems that Collins is going to be stubborn to the death with his game plan. Even Westies fans are now turning on him, this isnt going to end well for anyone I wouldnt think.
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:37 pm
geppscrossrams wrote:whufc wrote:Wolf Pack wrote:Every Sanfl club floods, that is the way the game is played now, 32 players often at one end of the ground. It is a joke. Collins in his 5th year. In a 9 team comp where 5 teams play finals, to not participate at all is not good enough. Time to go at seasons end Collo
Are you R&B in disguise, West are by far the biggest flooders and most unattractive side to watch in the SANFL, almost certain 90% of sanfl supporters who dont follow West would agree.
I'm trying to find where wolf pack has said that we don't flood. Troll!
by mal » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:30 pm
by bloods08 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:36 pm
mal wrote:The Interchange
Became a rule
Evolved into a tactic
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:38 pm
by dedja » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:39 pm
by mal » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:48 pm
Mark_Beswick wrote:To stop flooding, go back to a 2 man bench - No side will have the runners to cope with less interchange to run up and down the field - The sub rule has already improved the flood stats in the AFL.
We should have left the game alone years ago
More on the bench helps clubs with greater depth anyway.
Less players would increase strenght of all grades in the SANFL by one player. Less match payments - More long kicking and will bring the high mark back later in the games when it slows. The case that there will be more injuries doesnt work - The players are more tired with less interchange and collisions are not the high speed impact later in the game. Remember those heroic wins your side (whoever you support) had with 16 men and two gutsing it out in a forward pocket often taking that mark and scoring to win a game. It brought about that spirit of never say die. Maybe I'm a romatic for old style contested footy but this flooding game does not work. West have the player to be in the top five but wont get there when the midfields get the ball look up and have to go sideways because there is no one forward of 50.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |