scoob wrote:overloaded wrote:sack KP
He is serious CARP
KP just brought up his 150
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:50 pm
scoob wrote:overloaded wrote:sack KP
He is serious CARP
by jackpot jim » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:51 pm
by jackpot jim » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:56 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Interesting happenings in Sri Lanka!There was also a controversial element when the umpires, Asad Rauf and Bruce Oxenford, clamped down on Pietersen's unconventional switch hit when he was only two runs away from his 20th Test century.
Dilshan objected to the switch hit, in which Pietersen changes his hands on the bat to become, in effect, a left-hander, and stopped twice in his run-up as he anticipated a repeat. Rauf intervened on the grounds of timewasting - not against Dilshan but Pietersen - and after a conversation with Oxenford warned Pietersen and informed him there would be a five-run penalty if he repeated the tactic.
The umpires' decision left Pietersen's switch hit tactic, which he has used previously in his brashest moments, in question with clarification urgently being sought from the match officials and the ICC. The stroke has been passed as acceptable by MCC, the arbiters of the Laws, and indeed has been hailed as a positive innovation for the game.
Dilshan's protest came during an over in when Pietersen thrashed his way from 86 to 104. He had unveiled the switch hit in Dilshan's previous over to combat a defensive leg-stump line and when Dilshan delivered a woeful long hop it was apparent that Dilshan, until then Sri Lanka's most effective bowler, had lost the psychological game.
After being told by the umpires that he risked a timewasting penalty, Pietersen bided his time, reverse sweep again with Dilshan committed to the delivery, and reached his hundred to roars of approval from England's sizeable contingent of fans. The umpires were content with that.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-england-2012/content/current/story/559897.html
by The Dark Knight » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:21 pm
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:24 pm
by Media Park » Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:04 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:When I was watching some of Sri Lanka v England yesterday afternoon the commentators said that Andrew Strauss hasn't made a test hundred since the second innings of the 1st test of the last Ashes series (17 months and 22 innings ago).
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Jim05 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:30 pm
by brod » Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:35 am
by The Dark Knight » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:21 am
Media Park wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:When I was watching some of Sri Lanka v England yesterday afternoon the commentators said that Andrew Strauss hasn't made a test hundred since the second innings of the 1st test of the last Ashes series (17 months and 22 innings ago).
Against us he will have a Ponting like re-birth. Although likely under Cook's captaincy.
by am Bays » Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:57 pm
jackpot jim wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Interesting happenings in Sri Lanka!There was also a controversial element when the umpires, Asad Rauf and Bruce Oxenford, clamped down on Pietersen's unconventional switch hit when he was only two runs away from his 20th Test century.
Dilshan objected to the switch hit, in which Pietersen changes his hands on the bat to become, in effect, a left-hander, and stopped twice in his run-up as he anticipated a repeat. Rauf intervened on the grounds of timewasting - not against Dilshan but Pietersen - and after a conversation with Oxenford warned Pietersen and informed him there would be a five-run penalty if he repeated the tactic.
The umpires' decision left Pietersen's switch hit tactic, which he has used previously in his brashest moments, in question with clarification urgently being sought from the match officials and the ICC. The stroke has been passed as acceptable by MCC, the arbiters of the Laws, and indeed has been hailed as a positive innovation for the game.
Dilshan's protest came during an over in when Pietersen thrashed his way from 86 to 104. He had unveiled the switch hit in Dilshan's previous over to combat a defensive leg-stump line and when Dilshan delivered a woeful long hop it was apparent that Dilshan, until then Sri Lanka's most effective bowler, had lost the psychological game.
After being told by the umpires that he risked a timewasting penalty, Pietersen bided his time, reverse sweep again with Dilshan committed to the delivery, and reached his hundred to roars of approval from England's sizeable contingent of fans. The umpires were content with that.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-england-2012/content/current/story/559897.html
What Joke. Typical whinging Sub continent countries, complain about everything when things arnt going their way.
by Jim05 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:22 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 4:21 pm
Jim05 wrote:Agreed 100% AM Bays, switch hitting should be illegal
by Jim05 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 4:57 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Agreed 100% AM Bays, switch hitting should be illegal
However, it is not illegal so the umpires had absolutely no right to do what they did.
Cheers
by Jim05 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:38 pm
by brod » Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:58 pm
by stampy » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:18 pm
by brod » Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:14 am
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:32 pm
by brod » Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:04 am
by bulldogproud2 » Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:04 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |