by smac » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:29 pm
by Johno6 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:39 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:43 pm
mal wrote:Giving Brett Lee a game is respect
He still does a good enough job
He gives 4,000% every time he plays
I consider Brett at his peak as being the best ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:45 pm
Johno6 wrote:so if someone on a losing side scores 150, but someone on the winning side scores 60 and they win, it should go to the winning sides player?
by Johno6 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:46 pm
by Media Park » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:52 pm
mal wrote:I consider Brett at his peak as being the best ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:29 pm
by brod » Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:09 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:35 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:Giving Brett Lee a game is respect
He still does a good enough job
He gives 4,000% every time he plays
I consider Brett at his peak as being the best ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
Wow. I reckon there might be a couple of dozen ahead of him.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:36 pm
brod wrote:YOUNG fast bowler James Pattinson will make his first appearance in the Caribbean after being named in Australia's team to play the opening Twenty20 against West Indies in St Lucia.
Pattinson was named in the side for Tuesday's (0500 Weds AEDT) first T20, along with allrounder Dan Christian, in the only changes from the team which won the final one-day international by 30 runs on Sunday.
The 21-year-old quick will be making his first appearance since straining a buttock muscle in the one-day final against Sri Lanka in Adelaide earlier this month.
Christian, overlooked for the last two one-day internationals, comes back into the side with Peter Forrest sidelined.
Ben Hilfenhaus, who hasn't been named in the squad for the two T20s, is the other player to be left out.
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:50 am
by mal » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:09 am
by mal » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:12 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:Giving Brett Lee a game is respect
He still does a good enough job
He gives 4,000% every time he plays
I consider Brett at his peak as being the best ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
Wow. I reckon there might be a couple of dozen ahead of him.
by MatteeG » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:14 am
mal wrote:Brett Lee is an attacking bowler
His economy rate is higher than most of the greats
But his phenoMenAL strike rate of 29.18 is clearly ahead of the other greats listed
There4 he is perhaps the greatest ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by mal » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:30 am
MatteeG wrote:mal wrote:Brett Lee is an attacking bowler
His economy rate is higher than most of the greats
But his phenoMenAL strike rate of 29.18 is clearly ahead of the other greats listed
There4 he is perhaps the greatest ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
So going by this logic Mal- Lee taking 4/75 off 10 is better than say Warney taking 2/35 off 10?
Just askin...
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:41 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:45 am
mal wrote:
Whichever way you look at it
I should have posted
LEE is ""ARGUABLY"" the best ODI bowler this country has produced
by reppoh_eht » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:56 am
mal wrote:MatteeG wrote:mal wrote:Brett Lee is an attacking bowler
His economy rate is higher than most of the greats
But his phenoMenAL strike rate of 29.18 is clearly ahead of the other greats listed
There4 he is perhaps the greatest ODI bowler Australia has ever produced
So going by this logic Mal- Lee taking 4/75 off 10 is better than say Warney taking 2/35 off 10?
Just askin...
The logic is
For every 10 overs the big4 bowlers bowled in a game their stats suggest :
48 LEE
38 LILLEE
38 MCGRATH
42 WARNE
So LEE is more expensive, but to offset this
LEE gets his wickets quicker than the other 3
Quite simply , he removes batsman quicker than the others
The longer a ODI batsman bats for, most times his scoring rate will increase
The logic might be by getting batters out quicker, they had less chances to improve their batting s/rates
The other factor is when I comapre Lillee with Lee [half the name and half as good]
Lillee bowled in an era when ODI scores and S/Rates of batsman were lower
So Lillee's economy of being 10 better than Lee can be misleading
But for Lee to strike at 29.18 compared to Lillee's 34.88 is quite an effort
Whichever way you look at it
I should have posted
LEE is ""ARGUABLY"" the best ODI bowler this country has produced
by Johno6 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:59 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:14 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:
Whichever way you look at it
I should have posted
LEE is ""ARGUABLY"" the best ODI bowler this country has produced
There is no argument. Lee is crud. End of story.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |