Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey wrote:I heard this Bagster
Things can change if he doesnt meet objectives
Done well to get a 2 year deal
At least gets paid out if they aren't happy

by Executive Member » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:04 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:carey wrote:I heard this Bagster
Things can change if he doesnt meet objectives
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:06 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:06 am
Executive Member wrote:At least gets paid out if they aren't happy
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:13 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:So what are peoples thoughts...
Win the toss and bat or bowl?
Forecast appears that it will be clear all afternoon but bit humid and overcast, tomorrow looks to be fine and sunny.. Is today a day where you go against the great Richie Benauds advice and bowl first?? ....
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:21 am
whufc wrote:There is NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER a good reason to bowl first in a final. And PG dont give me that i won the toss and bowled first last year and we won carp. You would have won by 400 runs if you had batted first LOL!!!!
You walk up to the opposition captain at the toss, you look the bastard in the eye and tell im. If i win this toss we are going to have a bat and you'll be chasing leather all day you filthy pig!
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:36 am
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:37 am
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:39 am
whufc wrote:In the Grade 2 GF i think it suits Atco to be a one dayer. They have a bit more power hitting on what will be a very slow outfield and have massive variety in their bowling attack with Parker, Sutton and the left armer.
LM what odds can i get on Al Hewitt to bowl more than 25 overs in their innings. Nothing surer than Gav will stick with what he trusts and Al is his man.
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:43 am
whufc wrote:In the Grade 2 GF i think it suits Atco to be a one dayer. They have a bit more power hitting on what will be a very slow outfield and have massive variety in their bowling attack with Parker, Sutton and the left armer.
LM what odds can i get on Al Hewitt to bowl more than 25 overs in their innings. Nothing surer than Gav will stick with what he trusts and Al is his man.
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:52 am
sports follower wrote:whufc wrote:In the Grade 2 GF i think it suits Atco to be a one dayer. They have a bit more power hitting on what will be a very slow outfield and have massive variety in their bowling attack with Parker, Sutton and the left armer.
LM what odds can i get on Al Hewitt to bowl more than 25 overs in their innings. Nothing surer than Gav will stick with what he trusts and Al is his man.
So on your reckoning ATCO should win?
Bigger hitters and massive variety in their bowling?
Not sure about either statement to be honest, time will tell. It will be a hard fought contest and the 1st hour of play will play a major part in how this game pans out.
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:01 am
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:05 am
sports follower wrote:WHUFC I was looking at your scores from
Last weeks semi final.
What was the 10 run penalty for in Atcos 2nd dig?
Don't think I have ever seen that before.
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:08 am
whufc wrote:sports follower wrote:WHUFC I was looking at your scores from
Last weeks semi final.
What was the 10 run penalty for in Atcos 2nd dig?
Don't think I have ever seen that before.
lol
not to sure mate as i wasnt on the ground but my educated guess is it was for verbal. they were off the same ball which was a wide that went for four. 15 of one ball not including the next ball which went for 2 is that some kind of record from one ball.
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:15 am
sports follower wrote:whufc wrote:sports follower wrote:WHUFC I was looking at your scores from
Last weeks semi final.
What was the 10 run penalty for in Atcos 2nd dig?
Don't think I have ever seen that before.
lol
not to sure mate as i wasnt on the ground but my educated guess is it was for verbal. they were off the same ball which was a wide that went for four. 15 of one ball not including the next ball which went for 2 is that some kind of record from one ball.
So a 10 run penalty for some chat in a 2nd innings after the game had been pretty much won.
Did the umpires make any reports if it was that serious to award a 10 run penalty.
by sports follower » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:34 am
by duck-mann » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:46 am
sports follower wrote:Still raining persistently at Craigmore, play may start late with clearing showers forecast.
Forecast for only 1-5 mm.
by carey » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:35 am
by carey » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:39 am
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:49 pm
by whufc » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:54 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |