SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

All discussions to do with the SANFL

SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Dutchy » Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:34 pm

User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45958
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2576 times
Been liked: 4187 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby southee » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:10 pm

Wow!!!! We all never knew!!!

.......thank you Rucci for telling us something we did not know :roll:
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby The Riddler » Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:38 pm

More proof UK Fan was correct!
The Riddler
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 2651
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:05 pm
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Barto » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:06 pm

How much money were Port given?
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Dog_ger » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:08 pm

No SANFL in 2015.

AFLSA to continue.

Maybe... #-o :-k

6 teams.

Maybe 2 AFL reserve teams only... :shock:

You were correct Max... :partyman:
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby whufc » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:24 pm

More evidence UK Fan was right after all!!!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28551
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2820 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Mark_Beswick » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:49 pm

Or DOGGER

Sell the AFL Clubs (Crows for a considerable sum, Port for whatever we can get - use $ to retire debt.
Then we have the right to charge whatever we like for the Adelaide Oval or Football Park Stadiums - We dont own either club and would have no loyalty towards them

We have the footy park land to develop and have dividends from investments for SANFL clubs each year - AFL can then please themselves

South = bery profitable
CDFC, NAFC - profitable
WWT & GFC - profitable
WAFC - after depreciation removed made a profit but have some work to do with future business plan
Norwood - should be profitable in 2012

Port - Doesnt matter
Sturt - have a lot of work to do

The SANFL is asset rich but needs to be careful with regards to cashflow for a few years - I think we should stay positive
Mark_Beswick
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Lockleys
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby SDK » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:29 pm

The Port Power are, have always been and always will be unviable.
Stop wasting money on a dead duck and let them die. Neither Adelaide Oval nor Jesus Christ himself can save Port Power so stop kidding ourself and pull the plug now. How long do they fxxxing want ?
Just makes me sad that the Port Adelaide Magpies ... the real Port Adelaide, have hitched themself to a fallen star.
Week in and week out people walk away from a shit brand of football that Port Power play. At least the Crows woke up, got rid of the robot master Craig and appointed a coach who will provide an entertaining style of play and bring back the crowds.
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby heater31 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:33 pm

Barto wrote:How much money were Port given?



Too much ;)
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16651
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby blueandwhite » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:51 pm

heater31 wrote:
Barto wrote:How much money were Port given?



Too much ;)


$14.75 million since 2007.
The sanfl had to go out and borrow money to keep them afloat.
TALK ABOUT THROWING GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD! :evil:
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Mic » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:27 pm

Starting Port Power and building Football Park at West lakes were 2 poor decisions by the SANFL, which is now costing them big-time.
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3126
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby JK » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:20 pm

Mic wrote:Starting Port Power and building Football Park at West lakes were 2 poor decisions by the SANFL, which is now costing them big-time.


Not having a go, but wondering why this was considered a poor decision?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby heater31 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:54 pm

JK wrote:
Mic wrote:Starting Port Power and building Football Park at West lakes were 2 poor decisions by the SANFL, which is now costing them big-time.


Not having a go, but wondering why this was considered a poor decision?



I think he could be referring to the location at West Lakes. From what I have heard the SANFL had other options but chose West Lakes as the best option.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16651
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby dedja » Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:14 pm

Other options being?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23309
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 649 times
Been liked: 1539 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Mic » Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:24 pm

Somewhere near a train (like 99% of the world's stadiums), somewhere central or just upgrade Adelaide Oval (like they have ended up doing).
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3126
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby mickey » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:51 pm

Mic wrote:Somewhere near a train (like 99% of the world's stadiums), somewhere central or just upgrade Adelaide Oval (like they have ended up doing).


Wasn't the original plan to have the grange line veer off to service football park?
User avatar
mickey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5694
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:54 pm
Location: Playing Poker
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 323 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby JK » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:46 am

West Lakes will still prove a fairly handy asset to the SANFL I would think, and served its purpose pre-AFL days
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby story of my life » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:29 am

dedja wrote:Other options being?


Apparently one of the preffered option was laffers triangle (the area of land between south rd, marion rd and sturt rd, acrross the road from Flinders hospital ) but in the 60's the end of the urban sprawl was believed to be ending at o'halloran hill so 95% of the population would live miles away. So even though they had to reclaim a swamp west lakes was considereed much more central.
story of my life
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:05 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby heater31 » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:05 am

Mic wrote:Somewhere near a train (like 99% of the world's stadiums), somewhere central or just upgrade Adelaide Oval (like they have ended up doing).


Have also heard an option was at Regency Park near where Coopers Brewery is now.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16651
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: SANFL lose $3.88m in 2011

Postby Booney » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:34 am

SDK wrote:The Port Power are, have always been and always will be unviable.
Stop wasting money on a dead duck and let them die. Neither Adelaide Oval nor Jesus Christ himself can save Port Power so stop kidding ourself and pull the plug now. How long do they fxxxing want ?
Just makes me sad that the Port Adelaide Magpies ... the real Port Adelaide, have hitched themself to a fallen star.
Week in and week out people walk away from a shit brand of football that Port Power play.
At least the Crows woke up, got rid of the robot master Craig and appointed a coach who will provide an entertaining style of play and bring back the crowds.


How far from reality do you want to be? You have simply associated on-field success with financial viability which is not a reality.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60928
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8041 times
Been liked: 11713 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

cron