by Catters_4eva » Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:27 pm
by GWW » Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:09 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:12 pm
by GWW » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:17 pm
by Squawk » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:59 am
by MagareyLegend » Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:39 pm
Jim05 wrote:Believe the Hawks have shown a fair bit of interest in him
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:40 pm
MagareyLegend wrote:Jim05 wrote:Believe the Hawks have shown a fair bit of interest in him
Every club has why are you singling out the Hawks? Do you have a vested interest?
by dedja » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:41 pm
GWW wrote:Andrew's son, doesn't qualify under father/son for the Crows.
by whufc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:30 am
by SDK » Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:38 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:08 pm
SDK wrote:Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Grahaml » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:15 pm
Wedgie wrote:SDK wrote:Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Up until 31 October 2010 the Crows were eligible to pick up any of Peter Carey's children and after 31 October 2010 Peter Carey's children were probably getting too old for AFL footy anyway.
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:18 pm
Grahaml wrote:Wedgie wrote:SDK wrote:Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Up until 31 October 2010 the Crows were eligible to pick up any of Peter Carey's children and after 31 October 2010 Peter Carey's children were probably getting too old for AFL footy anyway.
I thought it was very ironic when the AFL accepted Adelaide's (and presumably Port Adelaide's) issue with not having as many fathers as the VFL originated clubs. So the AFL rectified that by taking the start date out of it so the likes of Neil Kerley et al now became eligible fathers. All after Chad and Kane were drafted of course. Thankfully we should be getting to a point where very few pre 1991 players have sons coming through, then a few more years for Port and we'll have equality in this rule for once.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:52 pm
Wedgie wrote:Grahaml wrote:Wedgie wrote:SDK wrote:Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Up until 31 October 2010 the Crows were eligible to pick up any of Peter Carey's children and after 31 October 2010 Peter Carey's children were probably getting too old for AFL footy anyway.
I thought it was very ironic when the AFL accepted Adelaide's (and presumably Port Adelaide's) issue with not having as many fathers as the VFL originated clubs. So the AFL rectified that by taking the start date out of it so the likes of Neil Kerley et al now became eligible fathers. All after Chad and Kane were drafted of course. Thankfully we should be getting to a point where very few pre 1991 players have sons coming through, then a few more years for Port and we'll have equality in this rule for once.
It'll never be equal as Geelong player's sperm will always be the best.
by stun72 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:48 pm
SDK wrote:A fair bit of pressure on a 16 year old kid !
Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
by CoverKing » Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:15 am
stun72 wrote:SDK wrote:A fair bit of pressure on a 16 year old kid !
Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Criminal in what way?? While The 2 SA sides haven't had chances to pick any Father Son picks to date they keep picking guys from interstate - surely they should chose someone from SA at least they may have a chance to keep him instead of them going home.
by westcoastpanther » Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:36 am
CoverKing wrote:stun72 wrote:SDK wrote:A fair bit of pressure on a 16 year old kid !
Is criminal we can not have a father son rule here to keep sons of stars in this state. If Peter Carey had a kid he would be inelligble because his father only played 400+ games ???!!!!
Criminal in what way?? While The 2 SA sides haven't had chances to pick any Father Son picks to date they keep picking guys from interstate - surely they should chose someone from SA at least they may have a chance to keep him instead of them going home.
Didn't stop bock leaving. Pick the best available player
by overloaded » Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:03 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by westcoastpanther » Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:06 pm
overloaded wrote:time will tell wcp
by overloaded » Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:10 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |