hotstuff! wrote:Champ wrote:hotstuff! wrote:Karma Mt lofty, You wrote the book on paying players and it has given you sucess in the past. You have changed the hills football league forever for the worse, now you find yourself in your current position.
The only positive I can see for Mt lofty is now they have sorted out who wants to play for the club and who was only interested in the coin.
Build from there dont go back to your old ways.
I'm positive Bridgewater were more than happy to follow the trend of paying players for success and still do quite willingly. Does that mean they'll now stop and follow Lofty?
Bridgewater have maybe 5 paid players? Those players aren't only selected on ability but how they will influence culture.
Mt lofty back in the day had locals who couldn't get a game and loved the club, players that would make A grade at ANY other club, how would that influence culture? Yet Mt lofty would still pay 80-90% of the team. The locals who couldn't get a game went to Echunga and won a premiership.
As said above Mt Lofty following on our example, culture is the priority.
How's that going for you? I do believe 3 or 4 local Bridgewater players under the age of 21 left for Lofty last year?