by SDK » Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:27 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:46 am
by Dutchy » Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:59 am
SDK wrote:I think you have to give the new coach a fair go until you start sticking the knives in........ not that I care one way or the other.
Makes me laugh when Sturt people carry on about club rooms when they have the worst footbal facility in the history of the game. Not even an oval anymore and the surface is like a pig pen. Apologies to any pigs reading this !
by topsywaldron » Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:53 am
Dutchy wrote:SDK wrote:I think you have to give the new coach a fair go until you start sticking the knives in........ not that I care one way or the other.
Makes me laugh when Sturt people carry on about club rooms when they have the worst footbal facility in the history of the game. Not even an oval anymore and the surface is like a pig pen. Apologies to any pigs reading this !
Interesting observations.
by Booney » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:46 am
by topsywaldron » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:49 am
Booney wrote:The Maloney appointment seems a little naroow minded from the outside looking in, grasping at straws to bring the successful era of the early 00's back again with people from that era, good club men who would come cheap.
Port tried it with Ginever, it is an easy path to take, but is it the best one? Time will tell.
by Dutchy » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:53 am
topsywaldron wrote:Dutchy wrote:SDK wrote:I think you have to give the new coach a fair go until you start sticking the knives in........ not that I care one way or the other.
Makes me laugh when Sturt people carry on about club rooms when they have the worst footbal facility in the history of the game. Not even an oval anymore and the surface is like a pig pen. Apologies to any pigs reading this !
Interesting observations.
Which Glenelg fans is that directed at?
by Booney » Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:15 am
topsywaldron wrote:Booney wrote:The Maloney appointment seems a little naroow minded from the outside looking in, grasping at straws to bring the successful era of the early 00's back again with people from that era, good club men who would come cheap.
Port tried it with Ginever, it is an easy path to take, but is it the best one? Time will tell.
So, a bit like Roy Laird then?
by Roger The Dodger » Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:04 pm
Booney wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Booney wrote:The Maloney appointment seems a little naroow minded from the outside looking in, grasping at straws to bring the successful era of the early 00's back again with people from that era, good club men who would come cheap.
Port tried it with Ginever, it is an easy path to take, but is it the best one? Time will tell.
So, a bit like Roy Laird then?
I don't know, I don't recall the Laird appointment that well to be honest so I'll have to take your word for it.
by Big Phil » Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:23 pm
Roger The Dodger wrote:Booney wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Booney wrote:The Maloney appointment seems a little naroow minded from the outside looking in, grasping at straws to bring the successful era of the early 00's back again with people from that era, good club men who would come cheap.
Port tried it with Ginever, it is an easy path to take, but is it the best one? Time will tell.
So, a bit like Roy Laird then?
I don't know, I don't recall the Laird appointment that well to be honest so I'll have to take your word for it.
Laird played in a losing Grand Final to Port Adelaide in 1996.
by csbowes » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:10 pm
SDK wrote:No financials ??? Is that constitutional ?
Thought the whole idea of an AGM is to present a report on the club and surely finance is the number 1 issue. How can you vote for someone without knowing the performance ?
by csbowes » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:28 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:CS, after previous dealings with you I really don't want to become involved with your idiosyncrasies however, without going into specific details, the club did go through a process of due diligence in seeking a replacement for Normo, and other people were looked at for the job. The club chose to appoint Seamus. Read into it what you want. Every individual, company or club has the right to not publicize every minor detail of their dealings be it for their own privacy or for that of others. Doesn't mean that there's a conspiracy or bastardry going on.
Can't help but think that you feel embittered concerning the club.
That's all I'm going to add to this.
CUTTERMAN wrote:did go through a process of due diligence in seeking a replacement for Normo, and other people were looked at for the job. The club chose to appoint Seamus.
by csbowes » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:33 pm
by Bunton » Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:14 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:27 pm
by heater31 » Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:34 pm
Bunton wrote:don't be suprised if there is a MONSTER loss soon to be announced by Sturt
by Barto » Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:37 pm
Bunton wrote:don't be suprised if there is a MONSTER loss soon to be announced by Sturt
by CENTURION » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:54 pm
csbowes wrote:You're kidding... there was another loss?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |