Smasha wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:footys the winner wrote:
Extra batsman? How about dropping a bowler. You have 8 med pacers. And then johnny.
We have batsmen that can bowl, better to safeguard ourselves in both disciplines. You previously stated that our bowling will struggle to take wickets and now you are saying we should get rid of a bowler? Wouldn't you think we'd need to have plenty of options if that was the case?
why do people always think you have to be quick to get wickets ?
simple game , bowl good line and length and you will always pick up a wicket.
the slower you bowl the more the batter has to think and move his feet.
medium pacers have always had success in all forms of cricket.
spot on smasha pace is overrated imho not that having good pace doesnt help sometimes but it goes to and over the fence quicker aswell....look at world cricket the 2 greatest wicket takers ever bowl spin.... good luck to everone picked im sure you guys will do well....
but can only take wickets from players who they bowl too.. and he has largely bowled to the back half of sides after the top string bowlers have torn through the top orders of sides, hence the reason I rate Hanisch and Wellington and Anders as better spinners.
