by Thats Gold » Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:23 pm
by OKC! » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:58 pm
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:25 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Interesting squad.. P. Carmen comes as a bit of a suprise, as does R. Figallo.
N. Brookes hasn't exactly had an amazing season and B. Jenner with the exception of his back to back 50s has struggled also.
R. Hannun most of his runs against Parafield Gardens, has missed a few games and has struggled a bit apart from that.
A. Seccafien has hardly set the world alight since returning.
What about the two lads from Riverside in Grade 2 - Edge & Kinnear? or Matt Bennetts from Salisbury North & Frankie McConnell from EP?
There were 3 people looking into a possible team with a week and a half notice, no fault of the PDCA, had to wait for the games to be scheduled.
A large chunk of the current in-form players are playing under 21's which is on the same day, had to select enough to cover any unavailabilities.
P.Carman: Not setting the world on fire but his capabilities are known.
Brookesy: As above.
B.J: Has had a reasonable year, keeps aswell.
Raed: Scored an 80 odd against Angle Vale too, form hasn't been great but we know his capabilities, good for all 3 disciplines.
Secca's: Has had some tidy spells.
Edge & Kinnear: Obviously will be thought of aswell, when you have 3 B Grade sides in Grade 2 and Salisbury North who are lacking bowlers makes the standard a bit different to representative cricket.
Bennetts: 18 years old, thought he'd be in the U21's.
McConnell: I don't think he's keen.
Hope that clears a few things up for you mate, had to look at players that we KNOW will want to play and have done so before, not an easy task with limited phone numbers and time, a months notice would've been handy, what about you? You keen?
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:27 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:bagster wrote:Noel Craig, Lightning Mcqueen and lucky for some... im guessing the U21s is at craigmore, its only a guess thou, but coz it says craigmore cc on the post you commented on, im quietly confident its at craigmore...
Think you'll find LM & LFS were being sarcastic
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:34 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:footys the winner wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:footys the winner wrote:
Yes. Also got Picton in there aswell and ozolins that was my best 11 on talent. Not form. And BJ doesn't even keep in his team and he is gonna keep in our association side?
If you have a better suggestion I'm all side rear vision mirrors.
The obvious selection would be parkhouse but he is injured or not available. What about Thomas from cu? Crowhurst?? AV?
Certainly, thought Crowhurst kept extremely well on Saturday, with BJ though, you know you are getting an experienced player who can bat anywhere in the line-up.
As for Thomas, isn't he under 21?
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:50 am
Lucky For Some wrote:footys the winner wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:footys the winner wrote:
Wouldn't think so. He would probably be selected in under 21. Maybe bags could confirm.
Batting stats don't look great, would go for Taylor from Smithfield if it was purely on keeping skills.
Just a thought. You get a look at him first hand this week anyway.
Certainly do, also hoping my mate Frothies can find a way to leave his district game to come and have a look![]()
The thing with Ass. teams is that there are always different views on who should be included and there are always going to be players that are picked on reputation not current form. Nature of the beast unfortunately
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:33 am
Lucky For Some wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:The senior Association team should be represented by the best available XI regardless of their age. I know I preferred playing with the senior blokes instead of the underagers when I was a whipper snapper.
You make a very valid point Oz, why does the U21's team have a lock on the young players?
Surely, the Open team should be the priority and if players from the U21's are deemed to be in the best XI then they should be playing in the open team.
by bagster » Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:51 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Lucky For Some wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:The senior Association team should be represented by the best available XI regardless of their age. I know I preferred playing with the senior blokes instead of the underagers when I was a whipper snapper.
You make a very valid point Oz, why does the U21's team have a lock on the young players?
Surely, the Open team should be the priority and if players from the U21's are deemed to be in the best XI then they should be playing in the open team.
Under 21's comp is redundant anyway IMO, it doesn't have any reflection at all on standards of different comps.
by Lethal Dose » Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:16 am
rockstar wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Association Squad
N.Brookes (R&C)Useless
A.Carman (AV)Good, he's in.
J.Carman (AV)Good as well he's in too
P.Carman (AV) Whats this? Some sort of "special package bonus offer"? Get 2 Carmens the 3rd comes free?
N.Fenwick (CU)Fatwick, but so is his average this season, he's in
R.Figallo (R&C)Pfft token selection, must know the president or something..
J.Hanisch (OTH)Yeah why not, need a spinner who can swing the bat like a wild gladiator
R.Hannun (SM)Superstar, he's in
A.Hewitt (CR)Sure the token divvy 2 player - couple years ago was Hannun and he starred
B.Jenner (R&C)Hasn't the jockey got a race meet on that day? Hmm suppose you DO need a keeper though.. ok he's
D.Jenner (R&C)Good he's in
L.Kent (R&C)hmm.. so much effort in his bowling action for so little.. div 1 hatty, yeah he's in..
A.Leo (VIR)Too old
P.Macsai (PG)Too rubbish
J.McInnes (SW)Gotta have a token left armer.. he's in
S.McIntyre (SW)Captain of the top side, auto selection
J.Morris (SM)Yeah ok he's in too
S.Moss (SM)Na dont like his name
J.Natsias (VIR)Yeah he's in
B.Nixon (OTH)Too slow
A.Seccafien (VIR)Too over rated
T.Scott (OTH)Yep he's in
by Lucky For Some » Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:24 pm
by SmithyOTH » Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:40 pm
by Wizard of Oz » Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:16 pm
by Grahaml » Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:25 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:SW 236
AV 0/5ish
by Lucky For Some » Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:47 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:45 am
bagster wrote:LM, im not familiar with young bennetts ? what club? , as with the seniors, time wasnt on our side for 21s selection , most gr 1 and gr 2 clubs were contacted to submit any available players and his name didnt come up, the players who played away in game 1 have been given 1st choice to be available for the home games 2+3 .
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:49 am
bagster wrote:Ricky Thomas is over 21,he would play if a keeper is required, Jack Thomas 18 is in the 21s
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:50 am
bagster wrote:
too much assoc cricket.... IMO ...
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:33 pm
Lethal Dose wrote:rockstar wrote:S.Moss (SM)Na dont like his nameIs a very talented name mate, havent you seen cricket superstar champ, wouldnt want to say that down at smithfield mate, plenty of Moss named people have come through that club and none were rubbish, unlike your opinion
by catchit » Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:52 pm
Lethal Dose wrote:rockstar wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Association Squad
N.Brookes (R&C)Useless
A.Carman (AV)Good, he's in.
J.Carman (AV)Good as well he's in too
P.Carman (AV) Whats this? Some sort of "special package bonus offer"? Get 2 Carmens the 3rd comes free?
N.Fenwick (CU)Fatwick, but so is his average this season, he's in
R.Figallo (R&C)Pfft token selection, must know the president or something..
J.Hanisch (OTH)Yeah why not, need a spinner who can swing the bat like a wild gladiator
R.Hannun (SM)Superstar, he's in
A.Hewitt (CR)Sure the token divvy 2 player - couple years ago was Hannun and he starred
B.Jenner (R&C)Hasn't the jockey got a race meet on that day? Hmm suppose you DO need a keeper though.. ok he's
D.Jenner (R&C)Good he's in
L.Kent (R&C)hmm.. so much effort in his bowling action for so little.. div 1 hatty, yeah he's in..
A.Leo (VIR)Too old
P.Macsai (PG)Too rubbish
J.McInnes (SW)Gotta have a token left armer.. he's in
S.McIntyre (SW)Captain of the top side, auto selection
J.Morris (SM)Yeah ok he's in too
S.Moss (SM)Na dont like his name
J.Natsias (VIR)Yeah he's in
B.Nixon (OTH)Too slow
A.Seccafien (VIR)Too over rated
T.Scott (OTH)Yep he's in
Is a very talented name mate, havent you seen cricket superstar champ, wouldnt want to say that down at smithfield mate, plenty of Moss named people have come through that club and none were rubbish, unlike your opinion
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:35 am
catchit wrote:
Can't see how any of that makes sense over picking a bloke for assoc cricket....pretty sure he wouldn't play even if his last name was sibbick
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |