by marbles » Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:38 am
by story of my life » Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:41 am
marbles wrote:Well no way would foxtel hav mitchell park jumper on tv, the henley flinders although is a great day of history and rivalry is only C grade teams, the shoc game will be a shilacking, the modbury north pines could be good but yeah might be right on angle vale ttg game but ttg is a c grade team too.
My vote is sharks vs parks as game of the round
by zedman » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:35 pm
bar20 wrote:Perfect Drug wrote:Pretty sure Pines lost Sansbury and Newchurch*2 as well no? And would that mean Rigney an unlikely starter also?
Not sure about Sansbury but I've heard after months of shopping himself around and not being able to find a club that suits his 'lack of training' ethic along with the money he asked for D.Newchurch has decided to stay at North Pines and may only play B Grade with his brothers.
by Footy Chick » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:24 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by supersonicgun » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:40 pm
zedman wrote:bar20 wrote:Perfect Drug wrote:Pretty sure Pines lost Sansbury and Newchurch*2 as well no? And would that mean Rigney an unlikely starter also?
Not sure about Sansbury but I've heard after months of shopping himself around and not being able to find a club that suits his 'lack of training' ethic along with the money he asked for D.Newchurch has decided to stay at North Pines and may only play B Grade with his brothers.
sansbury at kenilworth..
by Yank Man » Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:45 pm
by moriachi » Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:38 am
by Yank Man » Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:03 am
moriachi wrote:The best players are generally between the ages of 23 & 30. Training twice a week should be no sweat.
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:34 am
I'm 28 and am 1/4 the player I reckon I was at 20-21 (not that I was ever much chopmoriachi wrote:The best players are generally between the ages of 23 & 30. Training twice a week should be no sweat.
by Freo HeaveHo » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:36 am
Yank Man wrote:1 night a week ain't gonna cut the mustard to be in the top three regardless of you fitness base in this Div. That would not have happened at the top 4 clubs in 2011. The good coaches with depth will demand more.
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:14 am
I'm with Freo - training is not as essential nor does it do as much for some, particularly with older guys it isn't going to make much difference. I know personally it wouldn't matter if I trained 3 times a week for 6 months straight, I still wouldn't have the aerobic capacity of others, nor the skill - if anything it would be to the detriment of my football as the wear and tear on the body would mean restriction on Saturdays. It really is dependent on the individual athlete. [/excuses to get out of training]Freo HeaveHo wrote:Yank Man wrote:1 night a week ain't gonna cut the mustard to be in the top three regardless of you fitness base in this Div. That would not have happened at the top 4 clubs in 2011. The good coaches with depth will demand more.
I disagree ... for instance if i a top side in this div had say a handful of their top players unable to train one night of the week it wouldnt affect them at all in my opinion. The difference between the top sides in these lower divisions is depth of players and that is all. Nearly all of the sides last few picked players are never going to be superstars no matter how hard you train.
I grew up playing in a league that only trained once a week , that team was all of the 23-27 age bracket pretty much so everyone was of a decent fitness level. And im no champion player myself but have played in a few sides with some great players but still rate that side as good as any i have been involved with. I guess im of the opinion that from a skills perspective you can only improve so much .
I guess my point it is ........ how long have we been kicking a footy for ?? since we were old enough to pick one up....... If you cant kick one now is training one night more a week going to make that big a difference ???
by story of my life » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:52 am
morell wrote:I'm with Freo - training is not as essential nor does it do as much for some, particularly with older guys it isn't going to make much difference. I know personally it wouldn't matter if I trained 3 times a week for 6 months straight, I still wouldn't have the aerobic capacity of others, nor the skill - if anything it would be to the detriment of my football as the wear and tear on the body would mean restriction on Saturdays. It really is dependent on the individual athlete. [/excuses to get out of training]Freo HeaveHo wrote:Yank Man wrote:1 night a week ain't gonna cut the mustard to be in the top three regardless of you fitness base in this Div. That would not have happened at the top 4 clubs in 2011. The good coaches with depth will demand more.
I disagree ... for instance if i a top side in this div had say a handful of their top players unable to train one night of the week it wouldnt affect them at all in my opinion. The difference between the top sides in these lower divisions is depth of players and that is all. Nearly all of the sides last few picked players are never going to be superstars no matter how hard you train.
I grew up playing in a league that only trained once a week , that team was all of the 23-27 age bracket pretty much so everyone was of a decent fitness level. And im no champion player myself but have played in a few sides with some great players but still rate that side as good as any i have been involved with. I guess im of the opinion that from a skills perspective you can only improve so much .
I guess my point it is ........ how long have we been kicking a footy for ?? since we were old enough to pick one up....... If you cant kick one now is training one night more a week going to make that big a difference ???
The more important thing about training is probably the team bonding/tactics/game plan/methodology aspects.
but I must disagree one one thing Freo - that you're not a champion player.
by zedman » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:12 pm
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:02 pm
One of, if not the biggest myths in football.zedman wrote:..you play the way you train..
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:04 pm
hahah, can only speak from personal experience and observations. Training is massively overrated at our level. All it does for me is increase the likelihood of inflaming a chronic injury.story of my life wrote:Morrell championing the cause for training one night a week... who would have thought. And Freo has more chance of owning a champion grey hound than being a champion player
by zedman » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:45 pm
morell wrote:One of, if not the biggest myths in football.zedman wrote:..you play the way you train..
by Q. » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:19 pm
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:31 pm
I am reading the book Moneyball at the moment after seeing the excellent movie. The idea around it is that sabermetrics (the measuring of events in baseball accurately) was proven to be a much better method for drafting and selecting players than going on old school baseball traditions and beliefs. The concept of picking up players and/or playing them based on their facial bone structure - known has having a "Good Face" - was not uncommon.zedman wrote:morell wrote:One of, if not the biggest myths in football.zedman wrote:..you play the way you train..
pfft..i hope thats sarcasm..one day you should coach a senior team morell and see if you agree then with what you are saying..because you wont..
so they can train once a week and train anyway they want, with perhaps circle work for 1 hour?, with any sort of crap attitude or slackness and you will still win games..lol..yeah, you might beat the scrubbers on talent only but thats it..
by morell » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:40 pm
Yeah but are those blokes you see doing that stuff on Saturday able to do so because of their natural talents and physical attributes or because they trained hard on Tuesday? I know which one I reckon...Quichey wrote:If anything, training is underrated at this level. Most blokes aren't going go out during the week and do their own fitness training to maintain their aerobic capacity they've gained from a pre-season, so from that point of view, one training a week is not enough. From an observational point of view, it's always been obvious that the blokes who consistently train both nights a week at a good intensity are the ones who have a higher endurance and ability to repeat sprint on game day.
Have you been talking to our coach? Biggest load of rubbish I have ever heard of. It's like having sex for virginity. The only thing exercising to run out sore spots does is increase pain thresholds and tolerance. This effect is called exercise-induced analgesia. There is much evidence out there it is actually a dangerous activity and can mask injuries which can lead to more serious and permanent damage.Quichey wrote:Also, the first training of the week is very good for shaking off Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness.
This is agree with.Quichey wrote:Two trainings also give you flexibility. Work on general team rules and structures on one night, while on the second night you can work on more specific areas like clearances and zones etc.
by zedman » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:50 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |